journal article·2019-08-27

Janus Segregation at the Carbon Nanotube–Catalyst Interface

Ksenia V. Bets, Evgeni S. Penev, Boris I. Yakobson

ACS Nano· Volume 13· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

The contact between a carbon nanotube (CNT) edge and a catalyst is a curvilinear interface of fundamental and practical importance. Here, the first-principles evidence shows that on a rigid/solid catalyst the faceted CNT edge is significantly lower in energy compared to the minimal-length circle, with the interface energy difference decreasing on more compliant surfaces. This universal trend, found for typical monometallic (Ni, Co), bimetallic (Co7W6), and metal carbide (WC) catalysts, results in a peculiar edge segregation into one-dimensional Janus (armchair–zigzag) interface. Its lowered energy greatly enhances the nucleation probability of chiral tubes, dramatically affecting their growth kinetics. This offers a richer basis for understanding, modeling, and control of catalytic CNT synthesis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Radioactive element chemistry and processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research · Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1795410.1103/PhysRevB.54.17954 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms589210.1038/ncomms5892 ↗
3. 10.1557/mrs.2017.23610.1557/mrs.2017.236 ↗
4. 10.1073/pnas.120751910910.1073/pnas.1207519109 ↗
5. 10.1039/C0NR00600A10.1039/C0NR00600A ↗
6. 10.1021/nl062482410.1021/nl0624824 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.09.17410.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.09.174 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.090096010610.1073/pnas.0900960106 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.18550110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.185501 ↗
10. 10.1038/srep0146010.1038/srep01460 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl501977b10.1021/nl501977b ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0228310.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02283 ↗
13. 10.1166/jnn.2006.30310.1166/jnn.2006.303 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.09.06410.1016/j.carbon.2009.09.064 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp308115f10.1021/jp308115f ↗
16. 10.1038/nature2105110.1038/nature21051 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.19550310.1103/PhysRevLett.108.195503 ↗
18. 10.1021/nn800190610.1021/nn8001906 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0745110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07451 ↗
20. 10.1002/pssb.20100030010.1002/pssb.201000300 ↗
21. 10.1007/s00220-007-0281-810.1007/s00220-007-0281-8 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.23550210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.235502 ↗
23. Tsao J. Y. · 2012
24. Nozières, P. In Solids Far from Equilibrium; Godrèche, C., Ed.; Collection Aléa-Saclay: Monographs and Texts in Statistical Physics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992; Vol. 56; pp 1–154.
25. 10.1126/science.251.4992.39310.1126/science.251.4992.393 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.498694910.1063/1.4986949 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.18550310.1103/PhysRevLett.107.185503 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.01810.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.018 ↗
29. 10.1038/nature1343410.1038/nature13434 ↗
30. 10.1126/science.aat622810.1126/science.aat6228 ↗
31. 10.1021/nn406462e10.1021/nn406462e ↗
32. 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01111-210.1016/S0009-2614(99)01111-2 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.081194610610.1073/pnas.0811946106 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
36. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗