journal article·2011-04-26

Nonlinear Conductivity of Fullerenol Aqueous Solutions

Roberto B. Sardenberg, Carlos E. Teixeira, Mauricio Pinheiro, José M. A. Figueiredo

ACS Nano· Volume 5· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Fullerenols have been a subject of intense research in many fields with the claim of possible applications in biomedicine such as free-radical sponges, antioxidants, and photosensitizers. However, its transport characteristics, important in determining the feasibility of many applications, have not been studied yet. In this work, electrochemical impedance of aqueous solutions of two types of fullerenols (C(60)(OH)(22-26) and C(60)(OH)(18-22)(OK)(4)) was measured. Sample conductivity was extracted from impedance data, and a nonlinear concentration-dependent conductivity was found for one of two types (C(60)(OH)(18-22)(OK)(4)). A concentration-dependent mobility that accounts electrophoretic and relaxation effects could explain experimental data. As a result, we obtained some fullerenol parameters, relevant to transport phenomena: its hydrodynamic radius, the number of attached hydroxides, and the number of counterions solvated into solution. In addition, an important result for pharmaceutical applications has been discussed, which is the change of pH in water induced by the different concentrations of fullerenol, indicating it behaves as a weak acid.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Caixa Postal 702, Belo Horizonte, MG-30.123-970, Brazil

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Kroto H. W. · Nature · 1985 · 318 · 16210.1038/318162a0 ↗
2. Krätschmer W. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1990 · 170 · 16710.1016/0009-2614(90)87109-5 ↗
3. Reyes-Reyes M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 110.1063/1.2006986 ↗
4. Park J. W. · Thin Solid Films · 2003 · 438 · 45710.1016/S0040-6090(03)00805-8 ↗
5. Harneit W. · Phys. Rev. A · 2002 · 65 · 110.1103/PhysRevA.65.032322 ↗
6. Bosi S. · Eur. J. Med. Chem. · 2003 · 38 · 91310.1016/j.ejmech.2003.09.005 ↗
7. Nakamura E. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2003 · 36 · 80710.1021/ar030027y ↗
8. Li J. · J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. · 1993 · 23 · 178410.1039/c39930001784 ↗
9. Li T. · J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. (Engl. Ed.) · 1999 · 6 · 3510.1007/s11771-999-0028-0 ↗
10. Gonzalez K. A. · Bioorg. Med. Chem. · 2002 · 10 · 199110.1016/S0968-0896(02)00049-4 ↗
11. Husebo L. O. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 1205510.1021/ja047593o ↗
12. Zhang J.-M. · Chin. J. Chem. · 2004 · 22 · 100810.1002/cjoc.20040220926 ↗
13. Alves G. C. · J. Braz. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 17 · 118610.1590/S0103-50532006000600017 ↗
14. Mirkov S. M. · Nitric Oxide · 2004 · 11 · 20110.1016/j.niox.2004.08.003 ↗
15. Djordjevic A. · Free Radical Res. · 2003 · 37 · 63
16. Yin J.-J. · Biomaterials · 2009 · 30 · 61110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.061 ↗
17. Dugan L. L. · Neurobiol. Dis. · 1996 · 3 · 12910.1006/nbdi.1996.0013 ↗
18. Lai H. S. · Transplant. Proc. · 2000 · 32 · 127210.1016/S0041-1345(00)01220-3 ↗
19. Dragojevic-Simic V. · Toxicol. Lett. · 2008 · 180 · S22110.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.092 ↗
20. Bogdanovic V. · J. Radiat. Res. · 2008 · 49 · 32110.1269/jrr.07092 ↗
21. Sardenberg R. · Electrochim. Acta · 2010 · 55 · 472210.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.044 ↗
22. Jamnik J. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 3 · 166810.1039/b100180i ↗
23. Hinokuma K. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 341 · 44210.1016/S0009-2614(01)00549-8 ↗
24. Hinokuma K. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2003 · 150 · A11210.1149/1.1527051 ↗
25. Oldham K. B. · 1994
26. Debye P. · Z. Phys. Chem. · 1923 · 24 · 185
27. Onsager L. · Z. Phys. Chem. · 1926 · 27 · 388
28. Onsager L. · Z. Phys. Chem. · 1927 · 28 · 277
29. Onsager L. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1932 · 36 · 268910.1021/j150341a001 ↗