journal article·2010-06-22

Estimating the Raman Cross Sections of Single Carbon Nanotubes

Johanna E. Bohn, Pablo G. Etchegoin, Eric C. Le Ru, Rong Xiang, Shohei Chiashi, Shigeo Maruyama

ACS Nano· Volume 4· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The order of magnitude of Raman differential cross sections of radial breathing modes (RBMs) of individual carbon nanotubes is measured for 633 and 785 nm laser excitations. This is shown by both a calibration applied to previously published data from other authors at 785 nm and our own measurements of individual nanotubes at 633 nm excitation. We find typical values of differential cross sections of RBMs to be on the order of approximately 10(-22) cm(2)/sr for resonant nanotubes on a silicon substrate. This study therefore provides a rigorous quantification of the accepted view that Raman cross sections of carbon nanotubes are "huge".
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

The MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Reich S. · 2004
2. Saito R. · 2004
4. Iijima S. · Nature · 1991 · 354 · 5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
5. Long D. A. · 200210.1002/0470845767 ↗
6. Dresselhaus M. S. · 2000
7. Lefrant S. · 2004
8. Dresselhaus M. S. · Adv. Phys. · 2000 · 49 · 70510.1080/000187300413184 ↗
9. Saito R. · New J. Phys. · 2003 · 5 · 157.110.1088/1367-2630/5/1/157 ↗
10. Filho A. G. S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 115428-1
11. Kneipp K. · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 2004 · 362 · 236110.1098/rsta.2004.1445 ↗
12. Jorio A. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 86 · 111810.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1118 ↗
13. Murakami Y. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 385 · 29810.1016/j.cplett.2003.12.095 ↗
14. Xiang R. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 47 · 197110.1143/JJAP.47.1971 ↗
15. Le Ru E. C. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 125 · 204701-1
16. Le Ru E. C. · 2009
17. Le Ru E. C. · J. Chem. Phys. C · 2007 · 111 · 1379410.1021/jp0687908 ↗
18. Duesberg G. S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 543610.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5436 ↗
19. Le Ru E. C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 194410.1021/jp054732v ↗
20. Yu P. Y. · 2004
21. Etchegoin P. G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1992 · 47 · 1029210.1103/PhysRevB.47.10292 ↗
22. Shim S. · ChemPhysChem · 2008 · 9 · 69710.1002/cphc.200700856 ↗
23. Etchegoin P. G. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 10 · 607910.1039/b809196j ↗