journal article·2013-08-27

The Influence of Chemical Bonding Configuration on Atomic Identification by Force Spectroscopy

Joachim Welker, Alfred John Weymouth, Franz J. Giessibl

ACS Nano· Volume 7· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

The force between two atoms depends not only on their chemical species and distance, but also on the configuration of their chemical bonds to other atoms. This strongly affects atomic force spectroscopy, in which the force between the tip of an atomic force microscope and a sample is measured as a function of distance. We show that the short-range forces between tip and sample atoms depend strongly on the configuration of the tip, to the point of preventing atom identification with a poorly defined tip. Our solution is to control the tip apex before using it for spectroscopy. We demonstrate a method by which a CO molecule on Cu can be used to characterize the tip. In combination with gentle pokes, this can be used to engineer a specific tip apex. This CO Front atom Identification (COFI) method allows us to use a well-defined tip to conduct force spectroscopy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Experimental and Applied Physics, Experimental Nanoscience, University of Regensburg, Universitaetsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Barth C. · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 47710.1002/adma.201002270 ↗
2. Lantz M. A. · Science · 2001 · 291 · 258010.1126/science.1057824 ↗
3. Sugimoto Y. · Nature · 2007 · 446 · 6410.1038/nature05530 ↗
4. Stillinger F. H. · Phys. Rev. B · 1985 · 31 · 526210.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262 ↗
5. Giessibl F. J. · Science · 1995 · 267 · 6810.1126/science.267.5194.68 ↗
6. Erlandsson R. · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · R830910.1103/PhysRevB.54.R8309 ↗
7. Nakagiri N. · Surf. Sci. · 1997 · 373 · L32910.1016/S0039-6028(96)01276-9 ↗
8. Uchihashi T. · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 56 · 983410.1103/PhysRevB.56.9834 ↗
9. Pérez R. · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 1083510.1103/PhysRevB.58.10835 ↗
10. Lantz M. · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 03532410.1103/PhysRevB.68.035324 ↗
11. Giessibl F. J. · Science · 2000 · 289 · 42210.1126/science.289.5478.422 ↗
12. Huang M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 25610110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.256101 ↗
13. Welker J. · Science · 2012 · 336 · 44410.1126/science.1219850 ↗
14. Wright C. A. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 502610.1021/nl2030773 ↗
15. Mattheiss L. · Phys. Rev. B · 1984 · 29 · 537210.1103/PhysRevB.29.5372 ↗
16. Posternak M. · Phys. Rev. B · 1980 · 21 · 560110.1103/PhysRevB.21.5601 ↗
17. Gross L. · Science · 2012 · 337 · 132610.1126/science.1225621 ↗
18. Chiutu C. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 26830210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.268302 ↗
19. Jelínek P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 17610110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.176101 ↗
20. Huang H. · Phys. Lett. A · 1988 · 130 · 16610.1016/0375-9601(88)90422-7 ↗
21. Ke S. H. · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 1531910.1103/PhysRevB.62.15319 ↗
22. Giessibl F. J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 147010.1063/1.126067 ↗
23. Weymouth A. J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 22680110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.226801 ↗
24. Wutscher T. · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 19542610.1103/PhysRevB.85.195426 ↗
25. Albers B. J. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 26400210.1088/0957-4484/20/26/264002 ↗
26. Giessibl F. J. A · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 12310.1063/1.1335546 ↗
27. Welker J. · Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 3 · 23810.3762/bjnano.3.27 ↗
28. Brommer K. D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 135510.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1355 ↗