Protein–DNA Chimeras for Nano Assembly
Source abstract
Abstract
In synthetic biology, "understanding by building" requires exquisite control of the molecular constituents and their spatial organization. Site-specific coupling of DNA to proteins allows arrangement of different protein functionalities with emergent properties by self-assembly on origami-like DNA scaffolds or by direct assembly via Single-Molecule Cut & Paste (SMC&P). Here, we employed the ybbR-tag/Sfp system to covalently attach Coenzyme A-modified DNA to GFP and, as a proof of principle, arranged the chimera in different patterns by SMC&P. Fluorescence recordings of individual molecules proved that the proteins remained folded and fully functional throughout the assembly process. The high coupling efficiency and specificity as well as the negligible size (11 amino acids) of the ybbR-tag represent a mild, yet versatile, general and robust way of adding a freely programmable and highly selective attachment site to virtually any protein of interest.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Bacteriophages and microbial interactions · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Nanoscience and Department of Physics, University of Munich, Amalienstraße 54, 80799 Munich, Germany
Center for Integrated Protein Science, 81377 Munich, Germany
Funding
European Research Council · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Kufer S. K. · Science · 2008 · 319 · 59410.1126/science.1151424 ↗
2. Puchner E. M. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 369210.1021/nl8018627 ↗
3. Rief M. · Nat. Struct. Biol. · 1999 · 6 · 34610.1038/7582 ↗
4. Morfill J. · Biophys. J. · 2007 · 93 · 240010.1529/biophysj.107.106112 ↗
5. Morfill J. · Biophys. J. · 2007 · 93 · 358310.1529/biophysj.107.112532 ↗
6. Dudko O. K. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 10810110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.108101 ↗
7. Strackharn M. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 242510.1021/nl300422y ↗
8. Strackharn M. · ChemPhysChem · 2012 · 13 · 91410.1002/cphc.201100765 ↗
9. Strackharn M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1519310.1021/ja305689r ↗
10. Akter F. · Anal. Chem. · 2012 · 84 · 504010.1021/ac300708r ↗
11. Burbulis I. · Nat. Methods · 2005 · 2 · 3110.1038/nmeth729 ↗
12. Cecconi C. · Eur. Biophys. J. · 2008 · 37 · 72910.1007/s00249-007-0247-y ↗
13. Rothemund P. W. · Nature · 2006 · 440 · 29710.1038/nature04586 ↗
14. Kolb H. C. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2001 · 40 · 200410.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2004::AID-ANIE2004>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
15. van Dongen S. F. · Bioconjugate Chem. · 2009 · 20 · 2010.1021/bc8004304 ↗
16. Wang L. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2004 · 44 · 3410.1002/anie.200460627 ↗
17. Wang L. · Science · 2001 · 292 · 49810.1126/science.1060077 ↗
18. Cellitti S. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 926810.1021/ja801602q ↗
19. Lallana E. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 879410.1002/anie.201101019 ↗
20. Los G. V. · ACS Chem. Biol. · 2008 · 3 · 37310.1021/cb800025k ↗
21. Popa I. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2013 · 135 · 1276210.1021/ja4056382 ↗
22. Keppler A. · Methods · 2004 · 32 · 43710.1016/j.ymeth.2003.10.007 ↗
23. Yin J. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 1581510.1073/pnas.0507705102 ↗
24. Maillard R. A. · Cell · 2011 · 145 · 45910.1016/j.cell.2011.04.010 ↗
25. Yin J. · Nat. Protoc. · 2006 · 1 · 28010.1038/nprot.2006.43 ↗
26. Wong L. S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 1245610.1021/ja8030278 ↗
27. Wong L. S. · Nanoscale · 2012 · 4 · 65910.1039/C1NR11443C ↗
28. Limmer K. · PLoS One · 2014 · 9 · e8962610.1371/journal.pone.0089626 ↗
29. Kufer S. K. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 4510.1038/nnano.2008.333 ↗
30. Kinkhabwala A. A. · Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 406 · 310.1016/j.chemphys.2012.04.011 ↗
31. Heucke S. F. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 39110.1021/nl401517a ↗
32. Heucke S. F. · Int. J. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 10 · 60710.1504/IJNT.2013.053529 ↗