journal article·2022-07

Bio-waste composites for cost-effective self-powered breathing patterns monitoring: An insight into energy harvesting and storage properties

Manisha Sahu, Sugato Hajra, Sagar Jadhav, Basanta Kumar Panigrahi, Deepak Dubal, Hoe Joon Kim

Publisher page

Abstract

The disposal of agricultural residues and solid biowaste from fruits and vegetables are detrimental to the environment as their decomposition creates toxic greenhouse gases. Herein, we demonstrate both energy harvesting and storage devices such as piezoelectric nanogenerator (PNG) and piezo-supercapacitor (PSC) by enforcing coconut husk (CH) as a filler into the polymer separator. To begin with, the CH powder was immobilized into the polyvinyl difluoride (PVDF) matrix to improve its piezoelectric performance. Remarkably, the poled PNG with a 7 wt% of CH powder/ PVDF composition delivers an output of voltage of 14 V, a current of 50 nA, and a power density of 0.35 μW/cm2 at 100 MΩ. This output performance is significant enough not only to charge commercial capacitors but also to power electronic devices. Further, the PVDF/CH piezoelectric separator was sandwiched between graphene electrodes to develop a supercapacitor. The device achieved a maximum power density of 1.316 mW/cm2 and an energy density of 76.33 mJ/cm2, which is significantly higher than other graphene/PVDF-based devices. The practical feasibility of PNG is demonstrated as a breathing pattern monitor, which is an effective way to tackle the SARS-CoV-2 virus health conditions. Thus, the presented investigation paves the way towards a circular economy and sustainability. © 2022 Elsevier B.V. ; FALSE ; scie ; scopus
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Taer · 2020 · 012164
2. Thinkohkaew · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2020 · 9 · 660210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.051 ↗
3. Singh · ACS Appl. Bio. Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 316410.1021/acsabm.9b00348 ↗
4. Q.M. Saqib, M.U. Khan, H. Song, M.Y. Chougale, R.A. Shaukat, J. Kim, J. Bae, M.J. Choi, S.C. Kim, O. Kwon, A. Bermak, Adv. Sustain. Syst., n/a 2100066.
5. Shaukat · Energy Rep. · 2021 · 7 · 72410.1016/j.egyr.2021.01.036 ↗
6. Azwar · Int. J. Hydrog. Energy · 2018 · 43 · 2081110.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.111 ↗
7. Wang · npj Flex. Electron. · 2017 · 1 · 1010.1038/s41528-017-0007-8 ↗
8. Zhao · Joule · 2021 · 5 · 139110.1016/j.joule.2021.03.013 ↗
9. Sahu · Nano Energy · 2021 · 8810.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106255 ↗
10. Sahu · Mater. Today Energy · 2021 · 20
11. Hajra · Nano Energy · 2021 · 8510.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105964 ↗
12. Barik · J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. · 2021 · 32 · 462910.1007/s10854-020-05201-w ↗
13. Siao · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2020 · 217 · 190071610.1002/pssa.201900716 ↗
14. Hajra · J. Polym. Res. · 2018 · 26 · 1410.1007/s10965-018-1673-5 ↗
15. Das · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2018 · 428 · 35610.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.077 ↗
16. Vivekananthan · Mater. Lett. · 2019 · 249 · 7310.1016/j.matlet.2019.02.134 ↗
17. Karan · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 200444610.1002/adfm.202004446 ↗
18. Sharma · Proc. Appl. Ceramics · 2017 · 11 · 17110.2298/PAC1703171S ↗
19. Ghosh · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109
20. Karan · Nano Energy · 2019 · 59 · 16910.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.031 ↗
21. Maiti · Nano Energy · 2017 · 42 · 28210.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.041 ↗
22. Pu · Chem. Sci. · 2021 · 12 · 3410.1039/D0SC05145D ↗
23. Chodankar · Nano Energy · 2021 · 9010.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106607 ↗
24. Song · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2015 · 3 · 1496310.1039/C5TA03349G ↗
25. Krishnamoorthy · Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 235110.1038/s41467-020-15808-6 ↗
26. Nayak · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 11710.1063/5.0010569 ↗
27. Cai · RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 1538210.1039/C7RA01267E ↗
28. Saïdi · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2014 · 19 · 13010.1016/j.mssp.2013.12.002 ↗
29. Singh · Polymer · 2006 · 47 · 591910.1016/j.polymer.2006.06.023 ↗
30. Dash · J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 715 · 2910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.310 ↗
31. Prabhakar · Fibers Polym. · 2015 · 16 · 111910.1007/s12221-015-1119-1 ↗
32. Auromun · Appl. Phys. A · 2019 · 125 · 4910.1007/s00339-018-2342-6 ↗
33. Brandrup · 1999
34. Shafee · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 132 · 74010.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.12.005 ↗
35. Rivas · J. Agric. Food Chem. · 2008 · 56 · 238010.1021/jf073388r ↗
36. Shereen · J. Adv. Res. · 2020 · 24 · 9110.1016/j.jare.2020.03.005 ↗
37. Xu · Electrochim. Acta · 2015 · 166 · 14210.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.101 ↗
38. Kil · RSC Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 2210210.1039/D0RA03985C ↗
39. Dubal · ChemSusChem · 2017 · 10 · 274210.1002/cssc.201700792 ↗
40. Johra · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2015 · 375 · 191110.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.128 ↗
41. Ramadoss · ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 433710.1021/acsnano.5b00759 ↗
42. Parida · J. Power Sources · 2017 · 342 · 7010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.083 ↗
43. Maitra · Nano Energy · 2017 · 40 · 63310.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.057 ↗