journal article·2013-11-26Open access

Manipulating Chiral Transmission by Gate Geometry: Switching in Graphene with Transmission Gaps

Redwan N. Sajjad, Avik W. Ghosh

ACS Nano· Volume 7· Issue 11

Abstract

We explore the chiral transmission of electrons across graphene heterojunctions for electronic switching using gate geometry alone. A sequence of gates is used to collimate and orthogonalize the chiral transmission lobes across multiple junctions, resulting in negligible overall current. The resistance of the device is enhanced by several orders of magnitude by biasing the gates into the bipolar npn doping regime, even as the ON state in the homogeneous nnn regime remains highly conductive. The mobility is preserved because the switching involves the suppression of transmission over a range of energy (transmission gap) instead of a structural band gap that would reduce the number of available channels of conduction. Under a different biasing scheme (npn to npp), this transmission gap can be made highly gate tunable, allowing a subthermal turn-on that beats the Landauer bound on switching energy, limiting present-day digital electronics.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Castro Neto A. H. · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
2. Novoselov K. S. · Nature · 2005 · 438 · 19710.1038/nature04233 ↗
3. Zhang Y. · Nature · 2005 · 438 · 20110.1038/nature04235 ↗
4. Beenakker C. W. J. · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2008 · 80 · 133710.1103/RevModPhys.80.1337 ↗
5. Lin Y.-M. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 42210.1021/nl803316h ↗
6. Balandin A. A. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 90210.1021/nl0731872 ↗
7. Bunch J. S. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 245810.1021/nl801457b ↗
8. Lee C. · Science · 2008 · 321 · 38510.1126/science.1157996 ↗
9. Zhou S. Y. · Nature · 2006 · 2 · 595
10. Cheianov V. V. · Science · 2007 · 315 · 125210.1126/science.1138020 ↗
11. Cserti J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 24680110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.246801 ↗
12. Péterfalvi C. · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 07541610.1103/PhysRevB.80.075416 ↗
13. Bolotin K. · Solid State Commun. · 2008 · 146 · 35110.1016/j.ssc.2008.02.024 ↗
14. Morozov S. V. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 01660210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.016602 ↗
15. Mecklenburg M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 11680310.1103/PhysRevLett.106.116803 ↗
16. Unluer D. · IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 10 · 93110.1109/TNANO.2010.2060348 ↗
17. Schwierz F. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 48710.1038/nnano.2010.89 ↗
18. Tseng, F.; Ghosh, A. W.From Low-Bias Mobility to High-Bias Current Saturation: Fundamental Trade-offs in Graphene Based Transistors.arXiv1003.4551 2010.
19. Novoselov K. S. · Nat. Phys. · 2006 · 2 · 17710.1038/nphys245 ↗
20. Sajjad R. N. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 12310110.1063/1.3640224 ↗
21. Katsnelson M. I. · Nat. Phys. · 2006 · 2 · 62010.1038/nphys384 ↗
22. Young A. F. · Nat. Phys. · 2009 · 5 · 22210.1038/nphys1198 ↗
23. Sutar S. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 446010.1021/nl3011897 ↗
24. Sajjad R. N. · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 15541210.1103/PhysRevB.86.155412 ↗
25. Cheianov V. V. · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 04140310.1103/PhysRevB.74.041403 ↗
26. Sajjad R. N. · J. Comput. Electron. · 2013 · 12 · 23210.1007/s10825-013-0459-6 ↗
27. Low T. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2009 · 56 · 129210.1109/TED.2009.2017646 ↗
28. Datta S. · 1997
29. Alam K. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 06430710.1063/1.2060962 ↗
30. Svizhenko A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 234310.1063/1.1432117 ↗