Longer-Lasting Electron-Based Microscopy of Single Molecules in Aqueous Medium
Source abstract
Abstract
Use of electron-based microscopy in aqueous media has been held back because aqueous samples tend to suffer from water radiolysis and other chemical degradation caused by the high energy of incident electrons. Here we show that aqueous liquid pockets in graphene liquid cells at room temperature display significantly improved stability when using deuterated water, D2O. Reporting transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments based on common imaging conditions, we conclude that use of D2O outperforms adding radical scavengers to H2O regardless of imaging details; it increases the lifetime of dissolved organic macromolecules by a factor of 2–5, and it delays by even longer the appearance of radiolysis-induced bubbles, by a factor of time up to 10. We quantify statistically the consequences of minimizing the electron voltage and dose and conclude that the D2O environment increases sample longevity without noticeable sacrifice of contrast that is critical for direct imaging of weakly scattering organic macromolecules and biomolecules.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
IBS Center for Soft and Living Matter, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
Department of Chemistry, UNIST, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
Department of Physics, UNIST, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
Funding
Institute for Basic Science
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.117210410.1126/science.1172104 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.121765410.1126/science.1217654 ↗
3. 10.1021/jacs.7b0906010.1021/jacs.7b09060 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20170355510.1002/adma.201703555 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aaa988610.1126/science.aaa9886 ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-11250110.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112501 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20150209010.1002/adfm.201502090 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl402694n10.1021/nl402694n ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0163610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01636 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20160227310.1002/adma.201602273 ↗
11. 10.1021/jp507400n10.1021/jp507400n ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cplett.2016.02.06610.1016/j.cplett.2016.02.066 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl404169a10.1021/nl404169a ↗
14. 10.1063/1.138302010.1063/1.1383020 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.19610210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.196102 ↗
16. 10.1038/nmeth93410.1038/nmeth934 ↗
17. 10.1161/01.STR.13.1.3510.1161/01.STR.13.1.35 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0438310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04383 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.07.01810.1016/j.ultramic.2012.07.018 ↗
20. 10.1529/biophysj.107.11768910.1529/biophysj.107.117689 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.06.04810.1016/j.cplett.2008.06.048 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0378-3812(98)00380-X10.1016/S0378-3812(98)00380-X ↗
23. 10.1021/ja953037610.1021/ja9530376 ↗
24. 10.1021/ma011346c10.1021/ma011346c ↗
25. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2007.04.00210.1016/j.vibspec.2007.04.002 ↗
26. 10.1021/jp963892r10.1021/jp963892r ↗
27. 10.1021/jp993239e10.1021/jp993239e ↗
28. 10.1021/j100892a02410.1021/j100892a024 ↗
29. 10.1039/ft993890119310.1039/ft9938901193 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.55583410.1063/1.555834 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0064898110.1007/BF00648981 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.156481810.1063/1.1564818 ↗
33. 10.1139/v06-01010.1139/v06-010 ↗
34. 10.1021/je60070a01810.1021/je60070a018 ↗
35. 10.1002/smll.20140208110.1002/smll.201402081 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.95.17.973810.1073/pnas.95.17.9738 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.498322610.1063/1.4983226 ↗
38. 10.1016/0920-3796(90)90028-510.1016/0920-3796(90)90028-5 ↗