journal article·2015-07-28

Hydrogenated Graphene as a Homoepitaxial Tunnel Barrier for Spin and Charge Transport in Graphene

Adam L. Friedman, Olaf M. J. van ’t Erve, Jeremy T. Robinson, Keith E. Whitener, Berend T. Jonker

ACS Nano· Volume 9· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

We demonstrate that hydrogenated graphene performs as a homoepitaxial tunnel barrier on a graphene charge/spin channel. We examine the tunneling behavior through measuring the IV curves and zero bias resistance. We also fabricate hydrogenated graphene/graphene nonlocal spin valves and measure the spin lifetimes using the Hanle effect, with spintronic nonlocal spin valve operation demonstrated up to room temperature. We show that while hydrogenated graphene indeed allows for spin transport in graphene and has many advantages over oxide tunnel barriers, it does not perform as well as similar fluorinated graphene/graphene devices, possibly due to the presence of magnetic moments in the hydrogenated graphene that act as spin scatterers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Science and Technology Division, ‡Electronics Science and Technology Division, and §Chemistry Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375, United States

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research · U.S. Naval Research Laboratory

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Tombros N. · Nature · 2007 · 448 · 57110.1038/nature06037 ↗
2. Han W. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 79410.1038/nnano.2014.214 ↗
3. Volmer F. · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 161405(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.88.161405 ↗
4. Sosenko E. · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 24543610.1103/PhysRevB.89.245436 ↗
5. Pesin D. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 40910.1038/nmat3305 ↗
6. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, “Emerging Materials”, 2013, www.itrs.net.
7. Dery H. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2011 · 59 · 25910.1109/TED.2011.2173498 ↗
8. Cress C. D. · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2012 · 59 · 304510.1109/TNS.2012.2221479 ↗
9. Kochan D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 112 · 11660210.1103/PhysRevLett.112.116602 ↗
10. Kretinin A. V. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 327910.1021/nl5006542 ↗
11. Li X. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 281610.1021/ja109793s ↗
12. Drogeler M. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 605010.1021/nl501278c ↗
13. Castellanos-Gomez A. · 2D Mater. · 2014 · 1 · 01100210.1088/2053-1583/1/1/011002 ↗
14. Fert A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 18442010.1103/PhysRevB.64.184420 ↗
15. Yamaguchi T. · Appl. Phys. Express · 2013 · 6 · 07300110.7567/APEX.6.073001 ↗
16. Neumann I. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 11240110.1063/1.4820586 ↗
17. Han W. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 16720210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.167202 ↗
18. Dlubak B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 09250210.1063/1.3476339 ↗
19. Cobas E. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 300010.1021/nl3007616 ↗
20. van ’t Erve O. M. J. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 73710.1038/nnano.2012.161 ↗
21. Robinson J. T. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 63710.1021/nn304834p ↗
22. Friedman A. L. · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 416110.1038/ncomms4161 ↗
23. Stine R. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 431110.1021/nl4021039 ↗
24. Matis B. R. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 1710.1021/nn2034555 ↗
25. Whitener K. E. · Carbon · 2014 · 72 · 34810.1016/j.carbon.2014.02.022 ↗
26. Giesbers A. J. M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 16610110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.166101 ↗
27. Dev P. · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 03540410.1103/PhysRevB.89.035404 ↗
28. Faizabadi E. · Eur. Phys. J. B · 2012 · 85 · 19810.1140/epjb/e2012-30073-7 ↗
29. Moodera J. S. · J. Phys.: Cond. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 165202
30. Elias D. C. · Science · 2009 · 323 · 61010.1126/science.1167130 ↗
31. Matis B. R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 10311410.1063/1.4794990 ↗
32. Jonsson-Akerman B. J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 187010.1063/1.1310633 ↗
33. D’yakonov, M. I.; Perel’, V. I.InOptical Orientation, Modern Problems in Condensed Matter Science;Meier, F.; Zakharchenya, B.P., Eds.North-Holland:Amsterdam, 1984; Vol.8, p39.
34. Lou X. · Nat. Phys. · 2007 · 3 · 19710.1038/nphys543 ↗
35. Sze, S. M.Physics of Semiconductor Devices;Wiley-Interscience:New York, 1981; p29.
36. Avsar A. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 236310.1021/nl200714q ↗
37. Zhang P. · New J. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 03301510.1088/1367-2630/14/3/033015 ↗
38. Wang M. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 378610.1039/c3cp00071k ↗
39. Jonker B. T. · 2012 · 329
40. Nair R. R. · Nat. Phys. · 2012 · 8 · 19910.1038/nphys2183 ↗
41. Lee W.-K. · Adv. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 177410.1002/adma.201404144 ↗
42. McCreary K. M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 18660410.1103/PhysRevLett.109.186604 ↗
43. Nair R. R. · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 201010.1038/ncomms3010 ↗
44. Popinciuc M. · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 21442710.1103/PhysRevB.80.214427 ↗
45. Li C. H. · Nat. Commun. · 2011 · 2 · 24510.1038/ncomms1256 ↗