journal article·2013-10-22

Electrical Modulation of the Local Conduction at Oxide Tubular Interfaces

Ying-Hui Hsieh, Evgheni Strelcov, Jia-Ming Liou, Chia-Ying Shen, Yi-Chun Chen, Sergei V. Kalinin, Ying-Hao Chu

ACS Nano· Volume 7· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Heterointerfaces between complex oxides have sparked considerable interest due to their fascinating physical properties and their offering of new possibilities for next-generation electronic devices. The key to realize practical applications is the control through external stimuli. In this study, we take the self-assembled BiFeO3-CoFe2O4 tubular interface as a model system to demonstrate the nonvolatile electric control of the local conduction at the complex oxide tubular interface. The fundamental mechanism behind this modulation was explored based on static and dynamic conductive atomic force microscopies. We found the movement of oxygen vacancies in the BiFeO3-CoFe2O4 heterostructure is the key to drive this intriguing behavior. This study delivers a possibility in developing next-generation electronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

Department of Physics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Hwang H. Y. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 10310.1038/nmat3223 ↗
2. Takagi H. · Science · 2010 · 327 · 160110.1126/science.1182541 ↗
3. Hsieh Y. H. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 456410.1002/adma.201201929 ↗
4. Ohtomo A. · Nature · 2004 · 427 · 42310.1038/nature02308 ↗
5. Chu Y. H. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 172610.1021/nl900723j ↗
6. Seidel J. · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 22910.1038/nmat2373 ↗
7. Guyonnet J. · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 537710.1002/adma.201102254 ↗
8. Wu W. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 07720310.1103/PhysRevLett.108.077203 ↗
9. Meier D. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 28410.1038/nmat3249 ↗
10. Maksymovych P. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 190610.1021/nl104363x ↗
11. Thiel S. · Science · 2006 · 313 · 194210.1126/science.1131091 ↗
12. Liao S. C. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 411810.1021/nn200880t ↗
13. Zheng H. M. · Adv. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 274710.1002/adma.200601215 ↗
14. Zhan Q. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 17290210.1063/1.2364692 ↗
15. Balke N. · Nat. Phys. · 2012 · 8 · 8110.1038/nphys2132 ↗
16. Seidel J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 19760310.1103/PhysRevLett.105.197603 ↗
17. Strelcov E. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 345510.1021/nl400780d ↗
18. Yang C. H. · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 48510.1038/nmat2432 ↗
19. Chen Y. C. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 05201710.1063/1.4746077 ↗