journal article·2014-03-25

Synthetic Antiferromagnetic Nanoparticles as Potential Contrast Agents in MRI

Ruben Van Roosbroeck, Willem Van Roy, Tim Stakenborg, Jesse Trekker, Antoine D’Hollander, Tom Dresselaers, Uwe Himmelreich, Jeroen Lammertyn, Liesbet Lagae

ACS Nano· Volume 8· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

We present the top-down synthesis of a novel type of MRI T2 contrast agent with great control over size and shape using a colloidal lithography technique. The resulting synthetic antiferromagnetic nanoparticles (SAF-NPs) yield improved relaxivities compared to superparamagnetic iron oxide alternatives (SPIONs). For T2 weighted imaging, the outer sphere relaxation theory has shown that the sensitivity of a T2 contrast agent is dependent on the particle size with an optimal size that exceeds the superparamagnetic limit of SPIONs. With the use of the interlayer exchange coupling effect, the SAF-NPs presented here do not suffer from this limit. Adjusting the outer sphere relaxation theory for spherical particles to SAF-NPs, we show both theoretically and experimentally that the SAF-NP size can be optimized to reach the r2 maximum. With measured r2 values up to 355 s(-1) mM(-1), our SAF-NPs show better performance than commercial alternatives and are competitive with the state-of-the-art. This performance is confirmed in an in vitro MRI study on SKOV3 cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · MRI in cancer diagnosis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

IMEC, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium

Department of Biosystems, Division of Mechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium

Department of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical MRI/Mosaic, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium

Department of Physics, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Cole A. J. · Trends Biotechnol. · 2011 · 29 · 32310.1016/j.tibtech.2011.03.001 ↗
2. Parveen S. · Nanomedicine · 2012 · 8 · 14710.1016/j.nano.2011.05.016 ↗
3. Tran N. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 876010.1039/c0jm00994f ↗
4. Laurent S. · Chem. Rev. · 2008 · 108 · 206410.1021/cr068445e ↗
5. Hilger I. · Nanomedicine · 2012 · 7 · 144310.2217/nnm.12.112 ↗
6. Shokrollahi H. · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2013 · 33 · 448510.1016/j.msec.2013.07.012 ↗
7. Lu A.-H. · Angew. Chem. · 2007 · 46 · 122210.1002/anie.200602866 ↗
8. Vuong Q. L. · J. Magn. Reson. · 2011 · 212 · 13910.1016/j.jmr.2011.06.024 ↗
9. Kueny-Stotz M. · Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. · 2012 · 2012 · 198710.1002/ejic.201101163 ↗
10. Bárcena C. · Chem. Commun. · 2008 · 19 · 222410.1039/b801041b ↗
11. Lee S. J. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 37560310.1088/0957-4484/22/37/375603 ↗
12. Pöselt E. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 161910.1021/nn204591r ↗
13. Qi Y. · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2012 · 1 · 184610.1039/c3tb00037k ↗
14. Soenen S. J. · Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. · 2011 · 3 · 197
15. Paquet C. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 310410.1021/nn2002272 ↗
16. Bruno P. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1999 · 11 · 9403
17. Parkin S. S. P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1990 · 64 · 230410.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2304 ↗
18. Mauri D. · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 44 · 713110.1103/PhysRevB.44.7131 ↗
19. Unguris J. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 75 · 643710.1063/1.356954 ↗
20. Huang X. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 240710.1021/nl071083l ↗
21. Xu C. · Polym. Int. · 2007 · 56 · 82110.1002/pi.2251 ↗
22. Bowen P. · J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 23 · 63110.1081/DIS-120015368 ↗
23. Jans H. · Anal. Chem. · 2009 · 81 · 942510.1021/ac901822w ↗
24. Elmen G. W. · Bell Syst. Tech. J. · 1936 · 15 · 11310.1002/j.1538-7305.1936.tb00721.x ↗
25. Vuong Q. L. · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2012 · 1 · 50210.1002/adhm.201200078 ↗
26. Hu W. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 147910.1002/adma.200703077 ↗
27. Fu A. · Angew. Chem. · 2009 · 48 · 162010.1002/anie.200803994 ↗
28. Koh A. L. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 9B52210.1063/1.3358067 ↗
29. Joisten H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 25311210.1063/1.3518702 ↗
30. Courcier T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 09310710.1063/1.3633121 ↗
31. Zhou T. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 47010.1039/C1JM13692E ↗
32. Narayanan S. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 25110.1021/am201311c ↗
33. Righetti P. G. · J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods · 1981 · 4 · 34710.1016/0165-022X(81)90075-0 ↗
34. Gossuin Y. · Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. · 2009 · 1 · 299
35. Bulte J. W. M. · J. Magn. Reson. Imaging · 1993 · 3 · 64110.1002/jmri.1880030414 ↗
36. Klug G. · Magn. Reson. Med. · 2010 · 64 · 160710.1002/mrm.22557 ↗
37. Liong M. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 516810.1002/adma.201002219 ↗
38. Seo W. S. · Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 97110.1038/nmat1775 ↗
39. Colombo M. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2012 · 41 · 430610.1039/c2cs15337h ↗
40. Trekker J. · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 162710.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.006 ↗