Synthetic Antiferromagnetic Nanoparticles as Potential Contrast Agents in MRI
Source abstract
Abstract
We present the top-down synthesis of a novel type of MRI T2 contrast agent with great control over size and shape using a colloidal lithography technique. The resulting synthetic antiferromagnetic nanoparticles (SAF-NPs) yield improved relaxivities compared to superparamagnetic iron oxide alternatives (SPIONs). For T2 weighted imaging, the outer sphere relaxation theory has shown that the sensitivity of a T2 contrast agent is dependent on the particle size with an optimal size that exceeds the superparamagnetic limit of SPIONs. With the use of the interlayer exchange coupling effect, the SAF-NPs presented here do not suffer from this limit. Adjusting the outer sphere relaxation theory for spherical particles to SAF-NPs, we show both theoretically and experimentally that the SAF-NP size can be optimized to reach the r2 maximum. With measured r2 values up to 355 s(-1) mM(-1), our SAF-NPs show better performance than commercial alternatives and are competitive with the state-of-the-art. This performance is confirmed in an in vitro MRI study on SKOV3 cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · MRI in cancer diagnosis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
IMEC, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
Department of Biosystems, Division of Mechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
Department of Imaging and Pathology, Biomedical MRI/Mosaic, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
Department of Physics, KU Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Cole A. J. · Trends Biotechnol. · 2011 · 29 · 32310.1016/j.tibtech.2011.03.001 ↗
2. Parveen S. · Nanomedicine · 2012 · 8 · 14710.1016/j.nano.2011.05.016 ↗
3. Tran N. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 876010.1039/c0jm00994f ↗
4. Laurent S. · Chem. Rev. · 2008 · 108 · 206410.1021/cr068445e ↗
5. Hilger I. · Nanomedicine · 2012 · 7 · 144310.2217/nnm.12.112 ↗
6. Shokrollahi H. · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2013 · 33 · 448510.1016/j.msec.2013.07.012 ↗
7. Lu A.-H. · Angew. Chem. · 2007 · 46 · 122210.1002/anie.200602866 ↗
8. Vuong Q. L. · J. Magn. Reson. · 2011 · 212 · 13910.1016/j.jmr.2011.06.024 ↗
9. Kueny-Stotz M. · Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. · 2012 · 2012 · 198710.1002/ejic.201101163 ↗
10. Bárcena C. · Chem. Commun. · 2008 · 19 · 222410.1039/b801041b ↗
11. Lee S. J. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 37560310.1088/0957-4484/22/37/375603 ↗
12. Pöselt E. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 161910.1021/nn204591r ↗
13. Qi Y. · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2012 · 1 · 184610.1039/c3tb00037k ↗
14. Soenen S. J. · Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. · 2011 · 3 · 197
15. Paquet C. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 310410.1021/nn2002272 ↗
16. Bruno P. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1999 · 11 · 9403
17. Parkin S. S. P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1990 · 64 · 230410.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2304 ↗
18. Mauri D. · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 44 · 713110.1103/PhysRevB.44.7131 ↗
19. Unguris J. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 75 · 643710.1063/1.356954 ↗
20. Huang X. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 240710.1021/nl071083l ↗
21. Xu C. · Polym. Int. · 2007 · 56 · 82110.1002/pi.2251 ↗
22. Bowen P. · J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 23 · 63110.1081/DIS-120015368 ↗
23. Jans H. · Anal. Chem. · 2009 · 81 · 942510.1021/ac901822w ↗
24. Elmen G. W. · Bell Syst. Tech. J. · 1936 · 15 · 11310.1002/j.1538-7305.1936.tb00721.x ↗
25. Vuong Q. L. · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2012 · 1 · 50210.1002/adhm.201200078 ↗
26. Hu W. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 147910.1002/adma.200703077 ↗
27. Fu A. · Angew. Chem. · 2009 · 48 · 162010.1002/anie.200803994 ↗
28. Koh A. L. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 9B52210.1063/1.3358067 ↗
29. Joisten H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 25311210.1063/1.3518702 ↗
30. Courcier T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 09310710.1063/1.3633121 ↗
31. Zhou T. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 47010.1039/C1JM13692E ↗
32. Narayanan S. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 25110.1021/am201311c ↗
33. Righetti P. G. · J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods · 1981 · 4 · 34710.1016/0165-022X(81)90075-0 ↗
34. Gossuin Y. · Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. · 2009 · 1 · 299
35. Bulte J. W. M. · J. Magn. Reson. Imaging · 1993 · 3 · 64110.1002/jmri.1880030414 ↗
36. Klug G. · Magn. Reson. Med. · 2010 · 64 · 160710.1002/mrm.22557 ↗
37. Liong M. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 516810.1002/adma.201002219 ↗
38. Seo W. S. · Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 97110.1038/nmat1775 ↗
39. Colombo M. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2012 · 41 · 430610.1039/c2cs15337h ↗
40. Trekker J. · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 162710.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.006 ↗