journal article·2024-02-01Open access

Comparison of CdS nano films deposited by thermal evaporation and spray pyrolysis techniques

Physics Department, Faculty of Science, New Valley University, Egypt, A. N. Abouelkhir, E. R. Shaaban, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Madinah, Almadinah Al-Munawarah 42351, Saudi Arabia, M. Tag El-Dine, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, New Valley University, Egypt, K. I. Hussain, Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia, I. S. Yahia, Laboratory for environmental and biomedical applications (NLEBA), Semiconductor Lab., Physics Department, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Roxy, Cairo

Chalcogenide Letters· Volume 21· Issue 2

Abstract

Cadmium sulfide was prepared by first turning it into a powder, which was then used to evaporate heat to create thin films. Additionally, the spray pyrolysis method was used to produce films of cadmium sulfide. A structural comparison using the crystallize size and lattice parameters. Furthermore for the prepared samples, an analysis of their optical characteristics was conducted through measurements of absorbance, transmission, and reflection, resulting in the determination of the energy gap.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (11)

Show source-provided references
1. [1] R. Bhattacharya, S. Saha, Journal of Physics, 71, 187 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-008-0152-710.1007/s12043-008-0152-7 ↗
2. [2] A. Dumbrava, C. Badea, G. Prodan, V. Ciupina, Chalcogenide Letters, 7, 111 (2010).
3. [3] J. Travas-Sejdic, H. Peng, R. Cooney, G. Bowmaker, M. Cannell, C. Soeller, Current Applied Physics, 6, 562 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2005.11.06110.1016/j.cap.2005.11.061 ↗
4. [4] T. Elango, S. Subermanian, K.R. Maurli, Surf. Coat. Technol., 123(1), 8 (2003).
5. [5] K. Sharma, A.S. Al-Kabbi, G.S.S. Saini, S.K. Tripathi, Current Applied Physics, 13, 964 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2013.01.03710.1016/j.cap.2013.01.037 ↗
6. [6] V. Swaminathan, V. Subramanian, K.R. Murali, Thin Solid Films, 359, 113 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00692-610.1016/S0040-6090(99)00692-6 ↗
7. [7] R. Banerjee, R. Jayakrishnan, P. Ayyub, J. Phys., Condens. Matter, 12, 10647 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/12/50/32510.1088/0953-8984/12/50/325 ↗
8. [8] Al. L. Efros, M. Rosen, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 30, 475 (2000); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.47510.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.475 ↗
9. [9] S. Rahman, K. Nadeem, M.A. Rehman, M. Mumtaz, S. Naeem, I.L. Papst, Ceram. Int., 39, 5235 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.12.02310.1016/j.ceramint.2012.12.023 ↗
10. [10] S.A. Wolf, et al., Science, 294(5546), 1488 (2001); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.106538910.1126/science.1065389 ↗
11. [11] E.D.T. Atkins, Comprehensive Polymer Science and Supplements, 1, 613-650 (1989); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096701-1.00028-810.1016/B978-0-08-096701-1.00028-8 ↗