Catalyst Poisoning by Amorphous Carbon during Carbon Nanotube Growth: Fact or Fiction?
Source abstract
Abstract
The influence of amorphous carbon on FePt catalyst particles under chemical vapor deposition conditions typically applied for CNT growth is examined through two routes. In the first, FePt catalyst particles supported on alumina are exposed to a well-established cyclohexane thermal CVD reaction at various temperatures. At higher temperatures where self-pyrolysis leads to copious amorphous carbon and carbon tar formation, carbon nanotubes are still able to form. In the second route, an amorphous carbon film is first deposited over the catalyst particles prior to the CVD reaction. Even for reactions where further amorphous carbon is deposited due to self-pyrolysis, graphitization is still demonstrated. Our findings reveal that the presence of amorphous carbon does not prevent catalytic hydrocarbon decomposition and graphitization processes. We also show an additional catalytic reaction to be present, catalytic hydrogenation, a process in which carbon in contact with the catalyst surface reacts with H(2) to form CH(4).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
IFW Dresden, P.O. Box 270116, D-01171 Dresden, Germany
Technische Universität Dresden, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PH, United Kingdom
University of Dayton, Dayton, Ohio 45469, United States
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Tans S. J. · Nature · 1998 · 393 · 4910.1038/29954 ↗
2. Kuzumaki T. · J. Mater. Res. · 1998 · 13 · 244510.1557/JMR.1998.0340 ↗
3. Iijima S. · Nature · 1991 · 354 · 5610.1038/354056a0 ↗
4. Guo T. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 243 · 4910.1016/0009-2614(95)00825-O ↗
5. Rümmeli M. H. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 120910.1021/nl050692v ↗
6. Li W. Z. · Science · 1996 · 274 · 170110.1126/science.274.5293.1701 ↗
7. Lee C. J. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 327 · 27710.1016/S0009-2614(00)00877-0 ↗
8. Baker R. T. K. · J. Catal. · 1972 · 26 · 5110.1016/0021-9517(72)90032-2 ↗
9. Hofmann S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 036101/1
10. Reilly P. T. A. · Carbon · 2006 · 44 · 165310.1016/j.carbon.2006.01.018 ↗
11. Hata K. · Science · 2004 · 306 · 136210.1126/science.1104962 ↗
12. Zhang G. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 1614110.1073/pnas.0507064102 ↗
13. Yoshihara N. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1157710.1021/jp072887s ↗
14. Derbyshire F. J. · Carbon · 1975 · 13 · 11110.1016/0008-6223(75)90267-5 ↗
15. Zheng M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 063110/1
16. Liu N. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 29710.1021/nl103962a ↗
17. Orofeo C. M. · Nano Res. · 2011 · 4 · 53110.1007/s12274-011-0109-x ↗
18. Berndt M. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 063503/110.1063/1.3559302 ↗
19. Grodetskii A. E. · Fizika Tverdogo Tela · 1976 · 18 · 619
20. Krivoruchko O. P. · Mendeleev Commun. · 1998 · 3 · 9710.1070/MC1998v008n03ABEH000944 ↗
21. Schäffel F. · Chem. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 500610.1021/cm070950k ↗
22. Franklin N. R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 4571/110.1063/1.1429294 ↗
23. Rümmeli M. H. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 1577210.1021/ja0779405 ↗
24. Rümmeli M. H. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 114610.1021/nn9016108 ↗
25. Kingston C. T. · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2006 · 6 · 122510.1166/jnn.2006.310 ↗
26. Rümmeli M. H. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 823410.1021/jp072556f ↗
27. Ayala P. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 454 · 33210.1016/j.cplett.2008.02.041 ↗
28. Borowiak-Palen E. · Physica E · 2008 · 40 · 222710.1016/j.physe.2007.10.105 ↗
29. Costa S. · Mater. Sci. Poland · 2008 · 26 · 433
30. Datta S. S. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 191210.1021/nl080583r ↗
31. Schäffel F. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 197510.1021/nn103035y ↗
32. Schäffel F. · Nano Res. · 2009 · 2 · 69510.1007/s12274-009-9073-0 ↗