Physically Transient Photonics: Random versus Distributed Feedback Lasing Based on Nanoimprinted DNA
Source abstract
Abstract
Room-temperature nanoimprinted, DNA-based distributed feedback (DFB) laser operation at 605 nm is reported. The laser is made of a pure DNA host matrix doped with gain dyes. At high excitation densities, the emission of the untextured dye-doped DNA films is characterized by a broad emission peak with an overall line width of 12 nm and superimposed narrow peaks, characteristic of random lasing. Moreover, direct patterning of the DNA films is demonstrated with a resolution down to 100 nm, enabling the realization of both surface-emitting and edge-emitting DFB lasers with a typical line width of <0.3 nm. The resulting emission is polarized, with a ratio between the TE- and TM-polarized intensities exceeding 30. In addition, the nanopatterned devices dissolve in water within less than 2 min. These results demonstrate the possibility of realizing various physically transient nanophotonics and laser architectures, including random lasing and nanoimprinted devices, based on natural biopolymers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Random lasers and scattering media · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Nanotechnology Laboratory, CNR-Istituto Nanoscienze, via Arnesano, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
Institute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wyb. Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland
Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica “Ennio De Giorgi”, Università del Salento, via Arnesano, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Steckl A. J. · Nat. Photonics · 2007 · 1 · 310.1038/nphoton.2006.56 ↗
2. Kwon Y.-W. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2009 · 19 · 135310.1039/B808030E ↗
3. Singh B. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 02451410.1063/1.2220488 ↗
4. Hagen J. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 17110910.1063/1.2197973 ↗
5. Wanapun D. · ChemPhysChem · 2009 · 10 · 267410.1002/cphc.200900303 ↗
6. Heckman E. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 18111610.1063/1.2378400 ↗
7. Zhou J. · Opt. Lett. · 2010 · 35 · 151210.1364/OL.35.001512 ↗
8. Yu Z. · Appl. Opt. · 2007 · 46 · 150710.1364/AO.46.001507 ↗
9. Leonetti M. · Opt. Lett. · 2009 · 34 · 376410.1364/OL.34.003764 ↗
10. Sznitko L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 03110710.1063/1.3610566 ↗
11. Gather M. C. · Nat. Photonics · 2011 · 5 · 40610.1038/nphoton.2011.99 ↗
12. Toffanin S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 09111010.1063/1.4748120 ↗
13. Hwang S.-W. · Science · 2012 · 337 · 164010.1126/science.1226325 ↗
14. Heckman E. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 21111510.1063/1.2135205 ↗
15. Rau I. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 17111310.1063/1.4764535 ↗
16. Marmur J. · J. Mol. Biol. · 1962 · 5 · 10910.1016/S0022-2836(62)80066-7 ↗
17. Jones R. A. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 2008 · 26 · 256710.1116/1.2993258 ↗
18. Sun H. · Langmuir · 2009 · 25 · 1046610.1021/la900322d ↗
19. Czaplicki R. · Opt. Express · 2007 · 15 · 1526810.1364/OE.15.015268 ↗
20. Camposeo A. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · OP22110.1002/adma.201201453 ↗
21. Chou Y. · Science · 1996 · 272 · 8510.1126/science.272.5258.85 ↗
22. Sznitko L. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 576 · 3110.1016/j.cplett.2013.05.018 ↗
23. Polson R. C. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 04520510.1103/PhysRevB.71.045205 ↗
24. Samoc A. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2007 · 105 · 23610.1002/app.26082 ↗
25. Turnbull G. A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 12512210.1103/PhysRevB.64.125122 ↗
26. Yariv A. · 1989
27. Schneider D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 469310.1063/1.1760227 ↗
28. McCall J. G. · Nat. Protoc. · 2013 · 8 · 241310.1038/nprot.2013.158 ↗
29. Tanaka K. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 1067910.1021/ja9617855 ↗
30. Kawabe Y. · Adv. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 128110.1002/1521-4095(200009)12:17<1281::AID-ADMA1281>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
31. Del Carro P. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 2011010.1063/1.2387974 ↗