journal article·2011-10-25

Electroosmotic Flow in Microchannels with Nanostructures

Takao Yasui, Noritada Kaji, Mohamad Reza Mohamadi, Yukihiro Okamoto, Manabu Tokeshi, Yasuhiro Horiike, Yoshinobu Baba

ACS Nano· Volume 5· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Here we report that nanopillar array structures have an intrinsic ability to suppress electroosmotic flow (EOF). Currently using glass chips for electrophoresis requires laborious surface coating to control EOF, which works as a counterflow to the electrophoresis mobility of negatively charged samples such as DNA and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) denatured proteins. Due to the intrinsic ability of the nanopillar array to suppress the EOF, we carried out electrophoresis of SDS-protein complexes in nanopillar chips without adding any reagent to suppress protein adsorption and the EOF. We also show that the EOF profile inside a nanopillar region was deformed to an inverse parabolic flow. We used a combination of EOF measurements and fluorescence observations to compare EOF in microchannel, nanochannel, and nanopillar array chips. Our results of EOF measurements in micro- and nanochannel chips were in complete agreement with the conventional equation of the EOF mobility (μ(EOF-channel) = αC(i)(-0.5), where C(i) is the bulk concentration of the i-ions and α differs in micro- and nanochannels), whereas EOF in the nanopillar chips did not follow this equation. Therefore we developed a new modified form of the conventional EOF equation, μ(EOF-nanopillar) ≈ β[C(i) - (C(i)(2)/N(i))], where N(i) is the number of sites available to i-ions and β differs for each nanopillar chip because of different spacings or patterns, etc. The modified equation of the EOF mobility that we proposed here was in good agreement with our experimental results. In this equation, we showed that the charge density of the nanopillar region, that is, the total number of nanopillars inside the microchannel, affected the suppression of EOF, and the arrangement of nanopillars into a tilted or square array had no effect on it.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

FIRST Research Center for Innovative Nanobiodevices, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

Physical Chemistry Unit, Laboratory of Macromolecules and Microsystems in Biology and Medicine (MMBM), Curie Institute/CNRS UMR 168/Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France

National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan

Health Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Takamatsu 761-0395, Japan.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Rickwood D. · 1990
2. Watson J. D. · 2004
3. Landers J. P. · 2008
4. Viovy J. L. · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2000 · 72 · 81310.1103/RevModPhys.72.813 ↗
5. Volkmuth W. D. · Nature · 1992 · 358 · 60010.1038/358600a0 ↗
6. Huang L. R. · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2002 · 20 · 104810.1038/nbt733 ↗
7. Kaji N. · Anal. Chem. · 2004 · 76 · 1510.1021/ac030303m ↗
8. Yasui T. · Micro Total Anal. Syst. 2007 · 2007 · 2 · 1207
9. Han J. · Science · 2000 · 288 · 102610.1126/science.288.5468.1026 ↗
10. Fu J. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2007 · 2 · 12110.1038/nnano.2006.206 ↗
11. Mao P. · Lab Chip · 2009 · 9 · 58610.1039/B809370A ↗
12. Fu J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 01810310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.018103 ↗
13. Li W. L. · Nanotechnology · 2003 · 14 · 57810.1088/0957-4484/14/6/302 ↗
14. Cross J. D. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 02470110.1063/1.2757202 ↗
15. Pennathur S. · Anal. Chem. · 2007 · 79 · 831610.1021/ac0710580 ↗
16. Doyle P. S. · Science · 2002 · 295 · 223710.1126/science.1068420 ↗
17. Tabuchi M. · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2004 · 22 · 33710.1038/nbt939 ↗
18. Zeng Y. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 638810.1002/anie.200800816 ↗
19. Zeng Y. · Anal. Chem. · 2007 · 79 · 228910.1021/ac061931h ↗
20. Nazemifard N. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2010 · 49 · 332610.1002/anie.200906343 ↗
21. Slater G. W. · Methods Mol. Biol. · 2010 · 583 · 12110.1007/978-1-60327-106-6_5 ↗
22. Pu Q. S. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 109910.1021/nl0494811 ↗
23. Stein D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 03590110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.035901 ↗
24. Kim S. J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 04450110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.044501 ↗
25. Kaji N. · Anal. Bioanal. Chem. · 2006 · 386 · 75910.1007/s00216-006-0469-3 ↗
26. Tsukahara T. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2007 · 46 · 118010.1002/anie.200604502 ↗
27. Sakakibara J. · Exp. Fluids · 1999 · 26 · 710.1007/s003480050260 ↗
28. Chen Y. Y. · Bioelectromagnetics · 2009 · 30 · 58310.1002/bem.20514 ↗
29. Ross D. · Anal. Chem. · 2001 · 73 · 411710.1021/ac010370l ↗
30. Paul P. H. · Anal. Chem. · 1998 · 70 · 245910.1021/ac9709662 ↗
31. Nagata H. · Electrophoresis · 2005 · 26 · 224710.1002/elps.200410395 ↗
32. Huang X. H. · Anal. Chem. · 1988 · 60 · 183710.1021/ac00168a040 ↗