journal article·2019-09-24

Crack Propagation and Fracture Toughness of Graphene Probed by Raman Spectroscopy

Zilong Zhang, Xuewei Zhang, Yunlu Wang, Yang Wang, Yang Zhang, Chen Xu, Zhenxing Zou, Zehao Wu, Yang Xia, Pei Zhao, Hong Tao Wang

ACS Nano· Volume 13· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Fracture behaves as one of the most fundamental issues for solid materials. As a one-atom-thick crystal, many aspects in fracture mechanics of graphene are of high significance, such as the crack propagation and its fracture toughness. Here we present a method to study the fracture characteristics of graphene using Raman spectroscopy and designed chemical-vapor-deposited monolayer graphene with preset cracks. The dynamic fracture process of graphene was experimentally observed, and its fracture toughness was obtained using Griffith’s criterion based on the strain distribution derived from the frequency shifts of Raman bands. The fracture toughness of Kc = 6.1 ± 0.6 MPam and Gc = 37.4 ± 6.7 J/m2 are comparable with the previously reported theoretical and experimental values, and we believe that this simple and easy-to-operate approach of characterizing the fracture of graphene using Raman spectroscopy can also be extended to other two-dimensional materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Thermal properties of materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for X-Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310012, P. R. China

Institute of Applied Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310012, P. R. China

Key Laboratory of Soft Machines and Smart Devices of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310012, P. R. China

Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Anderson A. L. · 1991 · 3
2. 10.1038/nmat184910.1038/nmat1849 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10704-015-0039-910.1007/s10704-015-0039-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.eml.2017.01.00810.1016/j.eml.2017.01.008 ↗
5. 10.1098/rsta.1921.000610.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms478210.1038/ncomms4782 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.214810.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2148 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eml.2015.01.00710.1016/j.eml.2015.01.007 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.475411510.1063/1.4754115 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms1054610.1038/ncomms10546 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.12.02310.1016/j.commatsci.2016.12.023 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.eml.2014.12.00710.1016/j.eml.2014.12.007 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.402768110.1115/1.4027681 ↗
14. 10.1021/nl301908b10.1021/nl301908b ↗
15. 10.1166/jnn.2005.41410.1166/jnn.2005.414 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.07541210.1103/PhysRevB.75.075412 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10704-011-9675-x10.1007/s10704-011-9675-x ↗
18. 10.1063/1.486920710.1063/1.4869207 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10704-014-9931-y10.1007/s10704-014-9931-y ↗
20. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.123512610.1126/science.1235126 ↗
22. 10.1021/nl203547z10.1021/nl203547z ↗
23. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0307910.1021/acsnano.5b03079 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.eml.2016.11.00110.1016/j.eml.2016.11.001 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.23550210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.235502 ↗
26. 10.1126/science.117124510.1126/science.1171245 ↗
27. 10.1039/C8RA00770E10.1039/C8RA00770E ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.06910.1016/j.carbon.2018.03.069 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp205671r10.1021/jp205671r ↗
30. 10.1021/nn300726r10.1021/nn300726r ↗
31. 10.1021/nl400542n10.1021/nl400542n ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.081175410610.1073/pnas.0811754106 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.20543310.1103/PhysRevB.79.205433 ↗
34. 10.1038/srep0443910.1038/srep04439 ↗
35. 10.1146/annurev.ms.14.080184.00210510.1146/annurev.ms.14.080184.002105 ↗
36. 10.1166/jctn.2010.136610.1166/jctn.2010.1366 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.05.09010.1016/j.cplett.2010.05.090 ↗