Efficient Exciton Transport between Strongly Quantum-Confined Silicon Quantum Dots
Source abstract
Abstract
Many-body Green function analysis and first-order perturbation theory are used to quantify the influence of size, surface reconstruction, and surface treatment on exciton transport between small silicon quantum dots. Competing radiative processes are also considered in order to determine how exciton transport efficiency is influenced. The analysis shows that quantum confinement causes small (~1 nm) Si quantum dots to exhibit exciton transport efficiencies far exceeding that of their larger counterparts for the same center-to-center separation. This surprising result offers the prospect of designing assemblies of quantum dots through which excitons can travel for long distances, a game-changing paradigm shift for next-generation solar energy harvesting. We also find that surface reconstruction significantly influences the absorption cross section and leads to a large reduction in both transport rate and efficiency. Further, exciton transport efficiency is higher for hydrogen-passivated dots as compared with those terminated with more electronegative ligands, a result not predicted by Förster theory.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Alivisatos A. P. · Science · 1996 · 271 · 93310.1126/science.271.5251.933 ↗
2. Nozik A. J. · Phys. E (Amsterdam, Neth.) · 2002 · 14 · 11510.1016/S1386-9477(02)00374-0 ↗
3. Jurbergs D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 23311610.1063/1.2210788 ↗
4. Beard M. C. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 250610.1021/nl071486l ↗
5. Timmerman D. · Nat. Photonics · 2008 · 2 · 10510.1038/nphoton.2007.279 ↗
6. Madrid A. B. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 248710.1021/nn900584p ↗
7. Timmerman D. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 71010.1038/nnano.2011.167 ↗
8. Nozik A. J. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 273510.1021/nl102122x ↗
9. Lin Z. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 250310.1021/nn200141f ↗
10. Hyeon-Deuk K. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 123910.1021/nn2038884 ↗
11. Yu G. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 78 · 451010.1063/1.359792 ↗
12. Dittmer J. J. · Adv. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 127010.1002/1521-4095(200009)12:17<1270::AID-ADMA1270>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
13. Lu S. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 344310.1021/nl0719731 ↗
14. Lu S. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 454810.1021/nl903104k ↗
15. Dorn A. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 5 · 902810.1021/nn203227t ↗
16. Lu Z. H. · Nature · 1995 · 378 · 25810.1038/378258a0 ↗
17. Cheng K.-Y. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 115410.1021/nl903212y ↗
18. Puzzo D. P. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 158510.1021/nl1044583 ↗
19. Allan G. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 19531110.1103/PhysRevB.75.195311 ↗
20. Beard M. C. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 301910.1021/nl101490z ↗
21. Kšnig D. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 03533910.1103/PhysRevB.78.035339 ↗
22. Niesar S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 19311210.1063/1.3428359 ↗
23. Förster T. · Ann. Phys. · 1948 · 2 · 5510.1002/andp.19484370105 ↗
24. Dexter D. L. A · J. Chem. Phys. · 1953 · 21 · 83610.1063/1.1699044 ↗
25. Curutchet C. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1333610.1021/jp805682m ↗
26. Schrier J. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1115810.1021/jp800489m ↗
27. Baer R. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 128 · 18471010.1063/1.2913247 ↗
28. Tiago M. L. · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 20533410.1103/PhysRevB.73.205334 ↗
29. Hybertsen M. S. · Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 34 · 539010.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390 ↗
30. Onida G. · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2002 · 74 · 60110.1103/RevModPhys.74.601 ↗
31. Rohlfing M. · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 492710.1103/PhysRevB.62.4927 ↗
32. Delerue C. · 200410.1007/978-3-662-08903-3 ↗
33. Faulkner R. A. · Phys. Rev. · 1969 · 184 · 71310.1103/PhysRev.184.713 ↗
34. Szabo A. · 1996
35. Öğüt S · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 12740110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.127401 ↗
36. Trani F. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 07542310.1103/PhysRevB.72.075423 ↗
37. Ramos L. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2005 · 242 · 305310.1002/pssb.200562229 ↗
38. Hybertsen M. S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 151410.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1514 ↗
39. Kovalev D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 280310.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2803 ↗
40. Sykora M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 06740110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.067401 ↗
41. Zhou Z. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 16310.1021/nl025890q ↗
42. Dexter, D. L.Solid State Physics;Academic,New York, 1958; Vol.6, pp358–361.
43. Califano M. · Nano Lett · 2005 · 5 · 236010.1021/nl051027p ↗
44. Wilson W. L · Science · 1993 · 262 · 124210.1126/science.262.5137.1242 ↗
45. Brus L. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1995 · 117 · 291510.1021/ja00115a025 ↗
46. Chelikowsky J. R. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 124010.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1240 ↗
47. Kronik L. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2006 · 243 · 106310.1002/pssb.200541463 ↗
48. Information regarding PARSEC and RGWBS can be obtained athttp://parsec.ices.utexas.edu/andhttp://users.ices.utexas.edu/mtiago/RGWBS/manual.html, respectively.