Griffith Criterion for Nanoscale Stress Singularity in Brittle Silicon
Source abstract
Abstract
Brittle materials such as silicon fail via the crack nucleation and propagation, which is characterized by the singular stress field formed near the crack tip according to Griffith or fracture mechanics theory. The applicability of these continuum-based theories is, however, uncertain and questionable in a nanoscale system due to its extremely small singular stress field of only a few nanometers. Here, we directly characterize the mechanical behavior of a nanocrack via the development of in situ nanomechanical testing using a transmission electron microscope and demonstrate that Griffith or fracture mechanics theory can be applied to even 4 nm stress singularity despite their continuum-based concept. We show that the fracture toughness in silicon nanocomponents is 0.95 ± 0.07 MPa√m and is independent of the dimension of materials and therefore inherent. Quantum mechanics/atomistic modeling explains and provides insight into these experimental results. This work therefore provides a fundamental understanding of fracture criterion and fracture properties in brittle nanomaterials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Kyoto University, Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0199610.1038/nature01996 ↗
2. 10.1038/nnano.2006.5310.1038/nnano.2006.53 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature0638110.1038/nature06381 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature0645810.1038/nature06458 ↗
5. 10.1557/mrs.2014.510.1557/mrs.2014.5 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature0618110.1038/nature06181 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature0470610.1038/nature04706 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.118238310.1126/science.1182383 ↗
9. 10.1021/nl300957a10.1021/nl300957a ↗
10. 10.1021/nl100062n10.1021/nl100062n ↗
11. 10.1021/nl902132w10.1021/nl902132w ↗
12. 10.1021/nl052223z10.1021/nl052223z ↗
13. 10.1063/1.204254910.1063/1.2042549 ↗
14. 10.1109/84.89676510.1109/84.896765 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.36971110.1063/1.369711 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00112-410.1016/S0022-5096(98)00112-4 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.491954010.1063/1.4919540 ↗
18. 10.1098/rsta.1921.000610.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
19. Lawn B. · 199310.1017/CBO9780511623127 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.256.5063.153710.1126/science.256.5063.1537 ↗
21. 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00251-010.1016/1359-6454(95)00251-0 ↗
22. Michot G. · Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. · 1989 · 104 · 385
23. 10.1038/nature1100210.1038/nature11002 ↗
24. 10.1038/3506551710.1038/35065517 ↗
25. 10.1038/362329a010.1038/362329a0 ↗
26. 10.1038/335424a010.1038/335424a0 ↗
27. 10.1038/nature0729710.1038/nature07297 ↗
28. 10.1126/science.118047610.1126/science.1180476 ↗
29. 10.2320/matertrans.44.68110.2320/matertrans.44.681 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0054796810.1007/BF00547968 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0924-4247(99)00383-010.1016/S0924-4247(99)00383-0 ↗
32. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01186.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01186.x ↗
33. 10.1038/ncomms478210.1038/ncomms4782 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.11550110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.115501 ↗
35. 10.1080/0033757700823502710.1080/00337577008235027 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.166069910.1063/1.1660699 ↗
37. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00238-X10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00238-X ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.13550110.1103/PhysRevLett.115.135501 ↗
39. 10.1021/nl504768610.1021/nl5047686 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2003.12.00410.1016/j.commatsci.2003.12.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.05810.1016/j.msea.2009.01.058 ↗