Plasmonic Nanoclusters with Rotational Symmetry: Polarization-Invariant Far-Field Response vs Changing Near-Field Distribution
Source abstract
Abstract
Flexible control over the near- and far-field properties of plasmonic nanostructures is important for many potential applications, such as surface-enhanced Raman scattering and biosensing. Generally, any change in the polarization of the incident light leads to a change in the nanoparticle's near-field distribution and, consequently, in its far-field properties as well. Therefore, producing polarization-invariant optical responses in the far field from a changing near field remains a challenging issue. In this paper, we probe experimentally the optical properties of cruciform pentamer structures--as an example of plasmonic oligomers--and demonstrate that they exhibit such behavior due to their symmetric geometrical arrangement. We demonstrate direct control over hot spot positions in sub-20 nm gaps, between disks of 145 nm diameter at a wavelength of 850 nm, by means of scattering scanning near-field optical microscopy. In addition, we employ the coupled dipole approximation method to define a qualitative model revealing the relationship between the near and far field in such structures. The near-field profiles depend on particular mode superpositions excited by the incident field and, thus, are expected to vary with the polarization. Consequently, we prove analytically that the far-field optical properties of pentamers have to be polarization-independent due to their rotational symmetry.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.
Nonlinear Physics Centre, Research School of Physics and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, 4 Engineering Drive 3, Singapore 117576
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Maier S. A. · 200710.1007/0-387-37825-1 ↗
2. Halas N. J. · Chem. Rev. · 2011 · 111 · 391310.1021/cr200061k ↗
3. Giannini V. · Chem. Rev. · 2011 · 111 · 388810.1021/cr1002672 ↗
4. Stockman M. I. · Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 2202910.1364/OE.19.022029 ↗
5. Ye J. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 166010.1021/nl3000453 ↗
6. Lal S. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2008 · 37 · 89810.1039/b705969h ↗
7. Le F. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 70710.1021/nn800047e ↗
8. Luk’yanchuk B. · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 70710.1038/nmat2810 ↗
9. Miroshnichenko A. E. · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2010 · 82 · 225710.1103/RevModPhys.82.2257 ↗
10. Rahmani M. · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2012 · 7 · 32910.1002/lpor.201200021 ↗
11. Prodan E. · Science · 2003 · 302 · 41910.1126/science.1089171 ↗
12. Sonnefraud Y. · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2012 · 6 · 27710.1002/lpor.201100027 ↗
13. 10.1002/smll.20130141910.1002/smll.201301419 ↗
14. Sonnefraud Y. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 166410.1021/nn901580r ↗
15. Mukherjee S. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 269410.1021/nl1016392 ↗
16. Verellen N. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 166310.1021/nl9001876 ↗
17. Aydin K. · Nat. Commun. · 2011 · 2 · 51710.1038/ncomms1528 ↗
18. Rahmani, M.; Lukiyanchuk, B.; Liew, T.; Hong, M.InPlanar Isotropic Rotor-Shaped Nanostructures: An Alternative to Develop Oligomers; Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), 2012 Conference;IEEE, 2012; pp1–2.10.1364/QELS.2012.QTh4F.2 ↗
19. Liu W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 02110610.1063/1.3458694 ↗
20. Giannini V. · Plasmonics · 2010 · 5 · 9910.1007/s11468-009-9121-3 ↗
21. Hopkins B. · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 639510.1039/c3nr01291c ↗
22. Rahmani M. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 210110.1021/nl3003683 ↗
23. Hentschel M. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 272110.1021/nl101938p ↗
24. Fan J. A. · Science · 2010 · 328 · 113510.1126/science.1187949 ↗
25. Alonso-Gonzalez P. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 392210.1021/nl2021366 ↗
26. Hentschel M. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 204210.1021/nn103172t ↗
27. Zhang Y. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2013 · 110 · 921510.1073/pnas.1220304110 ↗
28. Lassiter J. B. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 318410.1021/nl102108u ↗
29. Wen F. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 502010.1021/nl302799h ↗
30. Chang W.-S. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 497710.1021/nl302610v ↗
31. Yang J. · Opt. Mater. Express · 2012 · 2 · 140710.1364/OME.2.001407 ↗
32. Bao K. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2010 · 100 · 33310.1007/s00339-010-5861-3 ↗
33. Sheikholeslami S. N. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 392710.1021/nl202143j ↗
34. Jäger S. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 356610.1021/nl401173g ↗
35. Weber D. · Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 1504710.1364/OE.19.015047 ↗
36. Alonso-González P. · Nat. Commun. · 2012 · 3 · 68410.1038/ncomms1674 ↗
37. Van de Hulst H. · Physica · 1949 · 15 · 74010.1016/0031-8914(49)90079-8 ↗
38. Hopkins, B.; Poddubny, A. N.; Miroshnichenko, A.; Kivshar, Y.Revisiting the Physics of Fano Resonances in Nanoparticle Oligomers.arXiv:1310.2983v1 , 2013.10.1103/PhysRevA.88.053819 ↗
39. McWeeny R. · 2002
40. McIsaac P. · IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. · 1975 · 23 · 42110.1109/TMTT.1975.1128584 ↗
41. Wang M. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 1171310.1021/jp4004054 ↗
42. Rahmani M. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2012 · 107 · 2310.1007/s00339-011-6732-2 ↗
43. Rahmani M. · Opt. Express · 2011 · 19 · 494910.1364/OE.19.004949 ↗
44. Rahmani M. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 24520410.1088/0957-4484/22/24/245204 ↗
45. Keilmann F. · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 2004 · 362 · 78710.1098/rsta.2003.1347 ↗
46. Jones A. C. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 255310.1021/nl900638p ↗
47. Dorfmuller J. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 237210.1021/nl900900r ↗
48. Vogelgesang R. · Analyst · 2010 · 135 · 117510.1039/c000887g ↗
49. Johnson P. B. · Phys. Rev. B · 1972 · 6 · 437010.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370 ↗