Understanding the Role of Solvation Forces on the Preferential Attachment of Nanoparticles in Liquid
Source abstract
Abstract
Optimization of colloidal nanoparticle synthesis techniques requires an understanding of underlying particle growth mechanisms. Nonclassical growth mechanisms are particularly important as they affect nanoparticle size and shape distributions, which in turn influence functional properties. For example, preferential attachment of nanoparticles is known to lead to the formation of mesocrystals, although the formation mechanism is currently not well-understood. Here we employ in situ liquid cell scanning transmission electron microscopy and steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations to demonstrate that the experimentally observed preference for end-to-end attachment of silver nanorods is a result of weaker solvation forces occurring at rod ends. SMD reveals that when the side of a nanorod approaches another rod, perturbation in the surface-bound water at the nanorod surface creates significant energy barriers to attachment. Additionally, rod morphology (i.e., facet shape) effects can explain the majority of the side attachment effects that are observed experimentally.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, United States
Funding
Biological and Environmental Research · Laboratory Directed Research and Development · U.S. Department of Energy
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0021-8502(97)10032-510.1016/S0021-8502(97)10032-5 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr100275d10.1021/cr100275d ↗
3. 10.3390/s12020165710.3390/s120201657 ↗
4. 10.1039/c0dt01404d10.1039/c0dt01404d ↗
5. 10.1021/jp051684610.1021/jp0516846 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1381-1169(99)00098-910.1016/S1381-1169(99)00098-9 ↗
7. 10.1039/B915383G10.1039/B915383G ↗
8. 10.1016/j.nantod.2013.03.00110.1016/j.nantod.2013.03.001 ↗
9. 10.1002/chem.20120333210.1002/chem.201203332 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20100202410.1002/anie.201002024 ↗
11. 10.1039/c3nr04717b10.1039/c3nr04717b ↗
12. 10.1016/j.physe.2011.01.01610.1016/j.physe.2011.01.016 ↗
13. 10.1021/nn303371y10.1021/nn303371y ↗
14. 10.1126/science.121918510.1126/science.1219185 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.121765410.1126/science.1217654 ↗
16. 10.1021/nn203837m10.1021/nn203837m ↗
17. 10.1021/nn300671g10.1021/nn300671g ↗
18. 10.1021/ja312620e10.1021/ja312620e ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.06140510.1103/PhysRevE.83.061405 ↗
20. 10.1021/nl201166k10.1021/nl201166k ↗
21. 10.1021/la204848610.1021/la2048486 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.03.01210.1016/j.ultramic.2012.03.012 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja412111f10.1021/ja412111f ↗
24. 10.1126/science.121964310.1126/science.1219643 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.117210410.1126/science.1172104 ↗
26. 10.1021/nl500766j10.1021/nl500766j ↗
27. 10.1016/j.micron.2004.02.00310.1016/j.micron.2004.02.003 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.07.01810.1016/j.ultramic.2012.07.018 ↗
29. 10.1039/c3cc48479c10.1039/c3cc48479c ↗
30. 10.1021/jp507400n10.1021/jp507400n ↗
31. 10.1002/anie.20100046310.1002/anie.201000463 ↗
32. 10.1039/b703897f10.1039/b703897f ↗
33. 10.1021/nl404533k10.1021/nl404533k ↗
34. 10.1021/nl403067p10.1021/nl403067p ↗
35. 10.1021/jp204630710.1021/jp2046307 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.161549310.1063/1.1615493 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.04.03110.1016/j.cplett.2013.04.031 ↗
38. 10.1006/jcis.1998.587010.1006/jcis.1998.5870 ↗
39. Chun, J.; Mundy, C. J.; Schenter, G. K.Personal communication, 2015.
40. 10.1038/nnano.2011.16110.1038/nnano.2011.161 ↗
41. 10.1021/nl404332810.1021/nl4043328 ↗
42. Izrailev S. · 1998 · 39
43. Kimura Y. · 1998
44. 10.1002/cphc.20140215010.1002/cphc.201402150 ↗
45. 10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.2710.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.27 ↗
46. 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.234620210.1109/TPAMI.2014.2346202 ↗