Coherent Exciton Dynamics in Supramolecular Light-Harvesting Nanotubes Revealed by Ultrafast Quantum Process Tomography
Source abstract
Abstract
Long-lived exciton coherences have been recently observed in photosynthetic complexes via ultrafast spectroscopy, opening exciting possibilities for the study and design of coherent exciton transport. Yet, ambiguity in the spectroscopic signals has led to arguments against interpreting them in terms of exciton dynamics, demanding more stringent tests. We propose a novel strategy, quantum process tomography (QPT), for ultrafast spectroscopy and apply it to reconstruct the evolving quantum state of excitons in double-walled supramolecular light-harvesting nanotubes at room temperature from eight narrowband transient grating experiments. Our analysis reveals the absence of nonsecular processes, unidirectional energy transfer from the outer to the inner wall exciton states, and coherence between those states lasting about 150 fs, indicating weak electronic coupling between the walls. Our work constitutes the first experimental QPT in a "warm" and complex system and provides an elegant scheme to maximize information from ultrafast spectroscopy experiments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Spectroscopy and Laser Applications · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Excitonics, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Funding
Office of Basic Energy Sciences
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Engel G. S. · Nature · 2007 · 446 · 78210.1038/nature05678 ↗
2. Collini E. · Nature · 2010 · 463 · 64410.1038/nature08811 ↗
3. Panitchayangkoon G. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2010 · 107 · 1276610.1073/pnas.1005484107 ↗
4. Mohseni M. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 129 · 17410610.1063/1.3002335 ↗
5. Plenio M. B. · New J. Phys. · 2008 · 10 · 11301910.1088/1367-2630/10/11/113019 ↗
6. Brumer P. · Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. · 2012 · 109 · 1957510.1073/pnas.1211209109 ↗
7. Kassal I. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 36210.1021/jz301872b ↗
8. Biggs J. D. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 131 · 22410110.1063/1.3257596 ↗
9. Yuen-Zhou J. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 136 · 23450110.1063/1.4725498 ↗
10. Milota F. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2013 · 117 · 600710.1021/jp3119605 ↗
11. Lee H. · Science · 2007 · 316 · 146210.1126/science.1142188 ↗
12. Richards G. H. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2014 · 5 · 4310.1021/jz402217j ↗
13. Eisele D. M. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 65810.1038/nnano.2009.227 ↗
14. Eisele D. M. · Nat. Chem. · 2012 · 65510.1038/nchem.1380 ↗
15. Rebentrost P. · Procedia Chem. · 2011 · 3 · 33210.1016/j.proche.2011.08.041 ↗
16. Yuen-Zhou J. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 134 · 13450510.1063/1.3569694 ↗
17. Yuen-Zhou J. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2011 · 108 · 1761510.1073/pnas.1110642108 ↗
18. Yuen-Zhou J. · 201410.1088/978-0-750-31062-8 ↗
19. Nielsen M. A. · 2000
20. Mukamel S. · 1995
21. Mukamel S. · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2000 · 51 · 69110.1146/annurev.physchem.51.1.691 ↗
22. Cho M. · 200910.1201/9781420084306 ↗
23. Riebe M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 22040710.1103/PhysRevLett.97.220407 ↗
24. Childs A. M. · Phys. Rev. A · 2001 · 64 · 01231410.1103/PhysRevA.64.012314 ↗
25. Weinstein Y. S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 121 · 611710.1063/1.1785151 ↗
26. Bialczak R. C. · Nat. Phys. · 2010 · 6 · 40910.1038/nphys1639 ↗
27. Myrskog S. H. · Phys. Rev. A · 2005 · 72 · 01361510.1103/PhysRevA.72.013615 ↗
28. Howard M. · New J. Phys. · 2006 · 8 · 3310.1088/1367-2630/8/3/033 ↗
29. Branderhorst M. P. A. · New J. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 11501010.1088/1367-2630/11/11/115010 ↗
30. Humble T. S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 06040210.1103/PhysRevLett.93.060402 ↗
31. Avisar D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 17040510.1103/PhysRevLett.106.170405 ↗
32. Hoyer S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 138 · 16410210.1063/1.4800800 ↗
33. de Castro R. R. · New J. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 02503210.1088/1367-2630/15/2/025032 ↗
34. De Rossi U. · J. Prak. Chem.-Chem. Ztg. · 1995 · 337 · 20310.1002/prac.19953370144 ↗
35. von Berlepsch H. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 170110.1021/jp065826n ↗
36. Eisele D. M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 210410.1021/ja907373h ↗
37. Scholes G. D. · Nat. Chem. · 2011 · 76310.1038/nchem.1145 ↗
38. Didraga C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 1147410.1021/jp026217s ↗
39. Didraga C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 1497610.1021/jp048288s ↗
40. Turner D. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2011 · 82 · 08130110.1063/1.3624752 ↗
41. Grant M. · 2008 · 9510.1007/978-1-84800-155-8_7 ↗
42. Grant, M.; Boyd, S.CVX: Matlab Software for Disciplined Convex Programming, Version 1.21; 2011.
43. Panitchayangkoon G. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2011 · 108 · 2090810.1073/pnas.1105234108 ↗
44. Moll J. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1995 · 102 · 636210.1063/1.1703017 ↗
45. Augulis R. · Phys. Status Solidi C · 2006 · 3 · 340010.1002/pssc.200672105 ↗
46. Sperling J. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2010 · 114 · 817910.1021/jp102173n ↗
47. Milota F. · Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 357 · 4510.1016/j.chemphys.2008.10.015 ↗
48. Womick J. M. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2009 · 113 · 658710.1021/jp811064z ↗
49. Womick J. M. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 663010.1021/jp810291d ↗
50. Stone K. W. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 116910.1126/science.1170274 ↗
51. Ruetzel S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 14830510.1103/PhysRevLett.110.148305 ↗
52. Shabani A. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 10040110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.100401 ↗
53. Sanders J. N. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 3 · 269710.1021/jz300988p ↗
54. Cerullo G. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2003 · 74 · 110.1063/1.1523642 ↗