journal article·2016-06-28

Dynamic Contact Angle at the Nanoscale: A Unified View

Alex V. Lukyanov, Alexei E. Likhtman

ACS Nano· Volume 10· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Generation of a dynamic contact angle in the course of wetting is a fundamental phenomenon of nature. Dynamic wetting processes have a direct impact on flows at the nanoscale, and therefore, understanding them is exceptionally important to emerging technologies. Here, we reveal the microscopic mechanism of dynamic contact angle generation. It has been demonstrated using large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of bead-spring model fluids that the main cause of local contact angle variations is the distribution of microscopic force acting at the contact line region. We were able to retrieve this elusive force with high accuracy. It has been directly established that the force distribution can be solely predicted on the basis of a general friction law for liquid flow at solid surfaces by Thompson and Troian. The relationship with the friction law provides both an explanation of the phenomenon of dynamic contact angle and a methodology for future predictions. The mechanism is intrinsically microscopic, universal, and irreducible and is applicable to a wide range of problems associated with wetting phenomena.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AX, United Kingdom

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.57.82710.1103/RevModPhys.57.827 ↗
2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.97710.1103/RevModPhys.77.977 ↗
3. 10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.12212410.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122124 ↗
4. 10.1038/282489a010.1038/282489a0 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0101296310.1007/BF01012963 ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev.fl.11.010179.00210310.1146/annurev.fl.11.010179.002103 ↗
7. 10.1016/0021-9797(69)90411-110.1016/0021-9797(69)90411-1 ↗
8. 10.1017/S002211208600033210.1017/S0022112086000332 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.128210.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1282 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.76610.1103/PhysRevLett.63.766 ↗
11. 10.1038/352418a010.1038/352418a0 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.277810.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2778 ↗
13. 10.1017/S002211209600480610.1017/S0022112096004806 ↗
14. 10.1021/la980476k10.1021/la980476k ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.05110.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.051 ↗
16. Shikhmurzaev Y. D. · 200710.1201/9781584887492 ↗
17. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.13023110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130231 ↗
18. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.73910.1103/RevModPhys.81.739 ↗
19. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.13033910.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130339 ↗
20. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/46/46412410.1088/0953-8984/21/46/464124 ↗
21. 10.1021/la401791710.1021/la4017917 ↗
22. 10.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-14073410.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-140734 ↗
23. 10.1017/S002211209900687410.1017/S0022112099006874 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.04670810.1103/PhysRevE.75.046708 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.03160210.1103/PhysRevE.69.031602 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.03301010.1103/PhysRevE.88.033010 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.23450310.1103/PhysRevLett.110.234503 ↗
28. 10.1021/nn504648610.1021/nn5046486 ↗
29. 10.1021/la403421b10.1021/la403421b ↗
30. 10.1126/science.109711610.1126/science.1097116 ↗
31. 10.1038/3868610.1038/38686 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.05160310.1103/PhysRevE.82.051603 ↗
33. 10.1039/a809733j10.1039/a809733j ↗
34. 10.1039/b616490k10.1039/b616490k ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.01830210.1103/PhysRevLett.92.018302 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.178657910.1063/1.1786579 ↗
37. 10.1021/ma070843b10.1021/ma070843b ↗
38. Glasstone S. · 1941
39. 10.1063/1.45854110.1063/1.458541 ↗
40. 10.1039/c3sm50861g10.1039/c3sm50861g ↗
41. 10.1063/1.477469010.1063/1.4774690 ↗