journal article·2011-09-27

Static Friction between Silicon Nanowires and Elastomeric Substrates

Qingquan Qin, Yong Zhu

ACS Nano· Volume 5· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper reports the first direct measurements of static friction force and interfacial shear strength between silicon (Si) nanowires (NWs) and poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS). A micromanipulator is used to manipulate and deform the NWs under a high-magnification optical microscope in real time. The static friction force is measured based on "the most-bent state" of the NWs. The static friction and interface shear strength are found to depend on the ultraviolet/ozone (UVO) treatment of PDMS. The shear strength starts at 0.30 MPa without UVO treatment, increases rapidly up to 10.57 MPa at 60 min of treatment and decreases for longer treatment. Water contact angle measurements suggest that the UVO-induced hydrophobic-to-hydrophilic conversion of PDMS surface is responsible for the increase in the static friction, while the hydrophobic recovery effect contributes to the decrease. The static friction between NWs and PDMS is of critical relevance to many device applications of NWs including NW-based flexible/stretchable electronics, NW assembly and nanocomposites (e.g., supercapacitors). Our results will enable quantitative interface design and control for such applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, 911 Oval Drive, Campus Box 7910, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Rogers J. A. · Science · 2010 · 327 · 160310.1126/science.1182383 ↗
2. Fan Z. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 373010.1002/adma.200900860 ↗
3. Lu W. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · R38710.1088/0022-3727/39/21/R01 ↗
4. Duan X. · Nature · 2003 · 425 · 27410.1038/nature01996 ↗
5. McAlpine M. C. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 37910.1038/nmat1891 ↗
6. Xu F. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 67210.1021/nn103189z ↗
7. Ryu S. Y. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 321410.1021/nl901450q ↗
8. Fan Z. Y. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 2010.1021/nl071626r ↗
9. Xu F. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 155610.1021/nn103183d ↗
10. Javey A. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 77310.1021/nl063056l ↗
11. Zhu Y. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 393410.1021/nl902132w ↗
12. Hoffmann S. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 62210.1021/nl052223z ↗
13. Li X. D. · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2003 · 163 · 521
14. Carpick R. W. · Chem. Rev. · 1997 · 97 · 116310.1021/cr960068q ↗
15. Szlufarska I. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 41 · 12300110.1088/0022-3727/41/12/123001 ↗
16. Bhaskaran H. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 18110.1038/nnano.2010.3 ↗
17. Falvo M. R. · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2000 · 2 · 23710.1023/A:1010017130136 ↗
18. Strus M. C. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 54410.1021/nl0728118 ↗
19. Ke C. · Small · 2010 · 6 · 43810.1002/smll.200901807 ↗
20. Manoharan M. P. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 09530410.1088/0022-3727/42/9/095304 ↗
21. Sheehan P. E. · Science · 1996 · 272 · 115810.1126/science.272.5265.1158 ↗
22. Bordag M. · Small · 2007 · 3 · 139810.1002/smll.200700052 ↗
23. Conache G. · Small · 2009 · 5 · 20310.1002/smll.200800794 ↗
24. Strus M. C. · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 38570910.1088/0957-4484/20/38/385709 ↗
25. Zhu Y. · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2010 · 5 · 29110.1007/s11671-009-9478-4 ↗
26. Falvo M. R. · Nature · 1997 · 389 · 58210.1038/39282 ↗
27. Duffy D. C. · Anal. Chem. · 1998 · 70 · 497410.1021/ac980656z ↗
28. Tummers, B.DataThief III 2006, http://datathief.org.
29. Wu Y. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 43310.1021/nl035162i ↗
30. Zhu Y. · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 2009 · 46 · 3110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.08.019 ↗
31. Thanawala S. K. · Langmuir · 2000 · 16 · 125610.1021/la9906626 ↗
32. Chaudhury M. K. · J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. · 1993 · 7 · 66910.1163/156856193X00907 ↗
33. Olah A. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 239 · 41010.1016/j.apsusc.2004.06.005 ↗
34. Egitto F. D. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 41 · 636210.1007/s10853-006-0712-5 ↗
35. Graubner V.-M. · Macromolecules · 2004 · 37 · 593610.1021/ma049747q ↗
36. Thangawng A. L. · Small · 2007 · 3 · 13210.1002/smll.200500418 ↗
37. Kim D. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 210810.1002/adma.200902927 ↗
38. Xu D. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2008 · 318 · 50710.1016/j.jcis.2007.09.086 ↗
39. Meyer M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 69 · 177710.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1777 ↗
40. Luthi R. · Science · 1994 · 266 · 197910.1126/science.266.5193.1979 ↗
41. Ye H. · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 186310.1021/la052030r ↗
42. Rinsch C. L. · Langmuir · 1996 · 12 · 299510.1021/la950685u ↗
43. Fu Y.-J. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 439210.1021/la903445x ↗
44. Efimenko K. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2002 · 254 · 30610.1006/jcis.2002.8594 ↗
45. Bhattacharya S. · J. Microelectromech. Syst. · 2005 · 14 · 59010.1109/JMEMS.2005.844746 ↗
46. Millare B. · Langmuir · 2008 · 24 · 1321810.1021/la801965s ↗
47. Kim J. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2000 · 226 · 23110.1006/jcis.2000.6817 ↗
48. Bao L. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 121510.1021/nl104205s ↗
49. Takahashi T. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 210210.1021/ja8099954 ↗
50. Ouyang M. · Chem. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 159110.1021/cm990770d ↗