journal article·2009-10-27

Atomic Force Microscope Nanomanipulation with Simultaneous Visual Guidance

Suenne Kim, Daniel C. Ratchford, Xiaoqin Li

ACS Nano· Volume 3· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to assemble prototype nanostructures consisting of colloidal nanoparticles. In the standard manipulation protocol, the AFM is used either as a manipulation tool or an imaging tool, but not both at the same time. We developed a new nanomanipulation protocol in which simultaneous visual guidance is obtained during manipulation. As an example, Au nanoparticles were manipulated on a substrate in two steps. First, a nanoparticle is kicked with the z feedback off. This kicking event reduces the static friction. Second, the nanoparticle is dribbled to a target position in tapping mode, and visual guidance is provided by a ghost trace of the nanoparticle. The new manipulation protocol greatly improves efficiency of manipulating small nanoparticles (15 nm in diameter or smaller). Our work highlights the importance and challenges of understanding friction at the nanoscale.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Center for Nano- and Molecular Science and Technology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Stroscio J. A. · Science · 1991 · 254 · 131910.1126/science.254.5036.1319 ↗
2. Eigler D. M. · Nature · 1990 · 344 · 52410.1038/344524a0 ↗
3. Manoharan H. C. · Nature · 2000 · 403 · 51210.1038/35000508 ↗
4. Sugimoto Y. · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 15610.1038/nmat1297 ↗
5. Sugimoto Y. · Science · 2008 · 322 · 41310.1126/science.1160601 ↗
6. Oyabu N. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 17610210.1103/PhysRevLett.90.176102 ↗
7. Urzhumov Y. A. · Opt. Express · 2007 · 15 · 1412910.1364/OE.15.014129 ↗
8. Requicha A. A. G. · 2008 · 239
9. Ramachandran T. R. · Nanotechnology · 1998 · 9 · 23710.1088/0957-4484/9/3/015 ↗
10. Kim Y. · Science · 1992 · 257 · 37510.1126/science.257.5068.375 ↗
11. Luthi R. · Science · 1994 · 266 · 197910.1126/science.266.5193.1979 ↗
12. Schaefer D. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 66 · 101210.1063/1.113589 ↗
13. Hertel T. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1998 · 102 · 91010.1021/jp9734686 ↗
14. Decossas S. · Nanotechnology · 2003 · 14 · 127210.1088/0957-4484/14/12/008 ↗
15. Hsieh S. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 23110.1021/jp012747x ↗
16. Chen H. · ASE, IEEE Trans. · 2006 · 3 · 208
17. Junno T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 66 · 362710.1063/1.113809 ↗
18. Baur C. · Nanotechnology · 1998 · 9 · 36010.1088/0957-4484/9/4/011 ↗
19. Miyazaki H. · Adv Robotics · 1997 · 11 · 16910.1163/156855397X00308 ↗
20. Yu M. · Nanotechnology · 1999 · 10 · 24410.1088/0957-4484/10/3/304 ↗
21. Fukuda T. · Proc. IEEE · 2003 · 91 · 180310.1109/JPROC.2003.818334 ↗
22. Ritter C. · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 779810.1021/la011318n ↗
23. Dieterich J. H. · Pure Appl. Geophys. · 1978 · 116 · 79010.1007/BF00876539 ↗
24. The particular value of threshold scanning rate in the first example does not apply generally. The control parameters for nanomanipulation such as scanning speed, set value, gain of the AFM, and the surface contact time, are correlated with each other to some extent and critically depend on the surface roughness and termination conditions. For example, the threshold scanning rate can be lowered as the surface contact time is reduced, and the set value needs to be increased as the contact time is prolonged.
25. The first and third NPs were assembled using the new methods, the eighth NP was assembled using a combination of the two methods, and the other five NPs were assembled using the standard method. In data presented in this report, the fast axis is typically parallel to the cantilever arm connected to the AFM tip.
26. Corwin A. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 245110.1063/1.1691198 ↗
27. Mate C. M. · 2008
28. Green P. F. · 200510.1201/9781420027143 ↗
29. Bocquet L. · Nature · 1998 · 396 · 73510.1038/25492 ↗
30. Estrin Y. · Pure Appl. Geophys. · 1996 · 147 · 74510.1007/BF01089700 ↗
31. Tabor D. · Proc. R. Soc. A · 1959 · 251 · 378
32. Riedo E. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 18550510.1103/PhysRevLett.88.185505 ↗
33. Carpick R. W. · Chem. Rev. · 1997 · 97 · 116310.1021/cr960068q ↗
34. Johnson K. L. · Proc. R. Soc. A · 1971 · 324 · 301
35. Maugis D. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1992 · 150 · 24310.1016/0021-9797(92)90285-T ↗
36. Tabor D. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1977 · 58 · 210.1016/0021-9797(77)90366-6 ↗
37. Timoshenko S. P. · 1987
38. Cottrell A. H. · 1953
39. While there have been reports that NPs may move during an image acquisition, no previous study has taken advantage of the time-dependent static friction for controllable manipulation.
40. Liu Z. · Microsc. Res. Tech. · 2006 · 69 · 99810.1002/jemt.20379 ↗
41. Dirk D. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 08430610.1063/1.2798628 ↗
42. Requicha A. A. G. · Proc. IEEE · 2003 · 91 · 192210.1109/JPROC.2003.818333 ↗