journal article·2013-10-22

Extraction and Quantification of Carbon Nanotubes in Biological Matrices with Application to Rat Lung Tissue

Kyle Doudrick, Nancy Corson, Günter Oberdörster, Alison C. Eder, Pierre Herckes, Rolf U. Halden, Paul Westerhoff

ACS Nano· Volume 7· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Extraction of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) from biological matrices such as rat lung tissue is integral to developing a quantification method for evaluating the environmental and human health exposure and toxicity of CNTs. The ability of various chemical treatment methods, including Solvable (2.5% sodium hydroxide/surfactant mixture), ammonium hydroxide, nitric acid, sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, hydrogen peroxide, and proteinase K, to extract CNTs from rat lung tissue was evaluated. CNTs were quantified using programmed thermal analysis (PTA). Two CNTs were used to represent the lower (500 °C) and upper (800 °C) PTA limit of CNT thermal stability. The recovery efficiency of each of the eight chemical reagents evaluated was found to depend on the ability to (1) minimize oxidation of CNTs, (2) remove interfering background carbon from the rat lung tissue, and (3) separate the solid-phase CNTs from the liquid-phase dissolved tissue via centrifugation. A two-step extraction method using Solvable and proteinase K emerged as the optimal approach, enabling a recovery of 98 ± 15% of a 2.9 ± 0.19 μg CNT loading that was spiked into whole rat lungs. Due to its high yield and applicability to low organ burdens of nanomaterials, this extraction method is particularly well suited for in vivo studies to quantify clearance rates and retained CNTs in lungs and other organs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanotechnology research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5306, United States

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642, United States

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1604, United States

Biodesign Institute, Security and Defense Systems Initiative, Center for Environmental Security, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5904, United States

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Endo M. · Carbon Nanotubes · 2008 · 111 · 1310.1007/978-3-540-72865-8_2 ↗
2. Maynard A. D. · J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part A · 2004 · 67 · 8710.1080/15287390490253688 ↗
3. Aschberger K. · Crit. Rev. Toxicol · 2010 · 40 · 75910.3109/10408444.2010.506638 ↗
4. Han J. H. · Inhalation Toxicol. · 2008 · 20 · 74110.1080/08958370801942238 ↗
5. Kuhlbusch T. A. J. · Part. Fibre Toxicol. · 2011 · 8 · 1810.1186/1743-8977-8-18 ↗
6. Donaldson K. · Toxicol. Sci. · 2006 · 92 · 510.1093/toxsci/kfj130 ↗
7. Ma-Hock L. · Toxicol. Sci. · 2009 · 112 · 46810.1093/toxsci/kfp146 ↗
8. Poland C. A. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 42310.1038/nnano.2008.111 ↗
9. Shvedova A. A. · Am. J. Physiol. · 2008 · 295 · L552
10. Pauluhn J. · Toxicol. Sci. · 2010 · 113 · 22610.1093/toxsci/kfp247 ↗
11. Ryman-Rasmussen J. P. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 74710.1038/nnano.2009.305 ↗
12. Petersen E. J. · Environ. Toxicol. Chem. · 2012 · 31 · 6010.1002/etc.710 ↗
13. Doudrick K. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 1224610.1021/es300804f ↗
14. NIOSH · 1998
15. Osswald S. · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 2007 · 38 · 72810.1002/jrs.1686 ↗
16. USEPA. SW-846 EPA Method 3050B, Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges and Soils: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,3rd ed.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:Washington DC, 1995.
17. USEPA. SW-846 EPA Method 3052, Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Siliceous and Organically Based Matrices;U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:Washington DC, 1996.
18. Griffis L. C. · Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. · 1983 · 3 · 9910.1016/S0272-0590(83)80063-3 ↗
19. Searl A. · Ann. Occup. Hyg. · 1997 · 41 · 72110.1016/S0003-4878(97)00023-9 ↗
20. Peng Y. · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2006 · 45 · 648310.1021/ie0604627 ↗
21. Rosca I. D. · Carbon · 2005 · 43 · 312410.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.019 ↗
22. Tchoul M. N. · Chem. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 576510.1021/cm071758l ↗
23. Porter D. · Nanotoxicology · 2008 · 2 · 14410.1080/17435390802318349 ↗
24. Xia T. · Environ. Health Perspect. · 2013 · 121 · 68310.1289/ehp.1306561 ↗
25. Bonner J. C. · Environ. Health Perspect. · 2013 · 121 · 67610.1289/ehp.1205693 ↗
26. Behler K. · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2006 · 8 · 61510.1007/s11051-006-9113-6 ↗
27. Bhalerao G. M. · Phys. E (Amsterdam, Neth.) · 2008 · 41 · 5410.1016/j.physe.2008.06.006 ↗
28. Chen J. · Carbon · 2007 · 45 · 27410.1016/j.carbon.2006.09.028 ↗
29. Kim Y. A. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 380 · 31910.1016/j.cplett.2003.09.027 ↗
30. Singh D. K. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 10
31. Tran M. Q. · Carbon · 2007 · 45 · 234110.1016/j.carbon.2007.07.012 ↗
32. Asgharian B. · Toxicol. Sci. · 1998 · 44 · 8010.1093/toxsci/44.1.80 ↗
33. Dresselhaus M. S. · Phys. Rep. · 2005 · 409 · 4710.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.006 ↗
34. Schonfelder R. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2012 · 106 · 84310.1007/s00339-012-6787-8 ↗