Statistical Analysis of Variation in Laboratory Growth of Carbon Nanotube Forests and Recommendations for Improved Consistency
Source abstract
Abstract
While many promising applications have been demonstrated for vertically aligned carbon nanotube (CNT) forests, lack of consistency in results (e.g., CNT quality, height, and density) continues to hinder knowledge transfer and commercialization. For example, it is well known that CNT growth can be influenced by small concentrations of water vapor, carbon deposits on the reactor wall, and experiment-to-experiment variations in pressure within the reaction chamber. However, even when these parameters are controlled during synthesis, we found that variations in ambient lab conditions can overwhelm attempts to perform parametric optimization studies. We established a standard growth procedure, including the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) recipe, while we varied other variables related to the furnace configuration and experimental procedure. Statistical analysis of 280 samples showed that ambient humidity, barometric pressure, and sample position in the CVD furnace contribute significantly to experiment-to-experiment variation. We investigated how these factors lead to CNT growth variation and recommend practices to improve process repeatability. Initial results using this approach reduced run-to-run variation in CNT forest height and density by more than 50%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanosynthesis Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2350 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Roco, M. C.; Mirkin, C. A.; Hersam, M. C.Nanotechnol. Res. Directions Soc. Needs 2020;Springer:Berlin, 2010; pp1–610.
2. Huang H. · Adv. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 165210.1002/adma.200500467 ↗
3. Marconnet A. M. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 481810.1021/nn200847u ↗
4. Tong T. · IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. · 2007 · 30 · 9210.1109/TCAPT.2007.892079 ↗
5. Esconjauregui S. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 743110.1021/nn1025675 ↗
6. Fu W. · Carbon · 2010 · 48 · 187610.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.026 ↗
7. Tawfick S. · Small · 2009 · 5 · 246710.1002/smll.200900741 ↗
8. Plata D. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 718510.1021/nn101842g ↗
9. Stadermann M. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 73810.1021/nl803277g ↗
10. Futaba D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 056104(1)10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.056104 ↗
11. Liu K. · Carbon · 2007 · 45 · 237910.1016/j.carbon.2007.07.008 ↗
12. Terranova M. L. · Chem. Vap. Deposition · 2006 · 12 · 31510.1002/cvde.200600030 ↗
13. Nessim G. D. · Nanoscale · 2010 · 2 · 130610.1039/b9nr00427k ↗
14. Hata K. · Science · 2004 · 306 · 136210.1126/science.1104962 ↗
15. Deepak F. L. · J. Chem. Sci. · 2006 · 118 · 910.1007/BF02708760 ↗
16. Cao A. · J. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 16 · 310710.1557/JMR.2001.0428 ↗
17. Zhang G. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 1614110.1073/pnas.0507064102 ↗
18. Futaba D. N. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 481110.1002/adma.200901257 ↗
19. Plata D. L. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 836710.1021/es901626p ↗
20. Meshot E. R. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 247710.1021/nn900446a ↗
21. Bedewy M. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 897410.1021/nn203144f ↗
22. Hart A. J. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 825010.1021/jp055498b ↗
23. Bedewy M. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 2057610.1021/jp904152v ↗
24. Chakrabarti S. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 45 · L72010.1143/JJAP.45.L720 ↗
25. Nessim G. D. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 358710.1021/nl801437c ↗
26. Raudenbush, S. W.; Liu, W.; Martinez, A.; Spybrook, J.Optimal Design Software for Multi-Level and Longitudinal Research(Version 3.01) [Software], 2011. Available fromwww.wtgrantfoundation.org.
27. Jeon B. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. (PCCP) · 2013 · 15 · 182110.1039/C2CP43490C ↗
28. Stumm W. · Ind. Eng. Chem. · 1961 · 53 · 14310.1021/ie50614a030 ↗
29. Leibbrandt G. W. R. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 194710.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1947 ↗
30. Morita M. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 68 · 127210.1063/1.347181 ↗
31. Nessim G. D. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 400210.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.043 ↗
32. In J. B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 153102(1)
33. In J. B. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 960210.1021/nn2028715 ↗
34. Wang B. N. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 585910.1021/jp068895a ↗
35. Meshot E. R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 113107(1)10.1063/1.2889497 ↗
36. Amama P. B. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 4410.1021/nl801876h ↗
37. Yamada T. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 428810.1021/nl801981m ↗
38. Meshot E. R. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 509110.1021/nn300758f ↗
39. Bedewy M. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 510610.1016/j.carbon.2012.06.051 ↗
40. Magrez A. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 342810.1021/nn200012z ↗
41. Wischert R. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1443010.1021/ja3042383 ↗
42. Li G. · Carbon · 2010 · 48 · 211110.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.054 ↗
43. Zhong G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 1732110.1021/jp905134b ↗
44. Eres G. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 1668410.1021/jp051531i ↗
45. Nessim G. D. · Carbon · 2011 · 49 · 80410.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.018 ↗
46. Richter H. · Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. · 2000 · 26 · 56510.1016/S0360-1285(00)00009-5 ↗
47. Jeong G.-H. · Carbon · 2009 · 47 · 69610.1016/j.carbon.2008.11.003 ↗
48. Oliver, C. R.; Westrick, W.; Koehler, J.; Cruz-Gonzalez, T.; Brieland-Shoultz, A.; Hart, A. J.Robofurnace: Automated CVD for High-Throughput Research and Process Optimization/Discovery(in preparation).
49. Copic D. · J. Visualized Exp. · 2012 · e3980