journal article·2015-02-24

Understanding the Transformation, Speciation, and Hazard Potential of Copper Particles in a Model Septic Tank System Using Zebrafish to Monitor the Effluent

Sijie Lin, Alicia A. Taylor, Zhaoxia Ji, Chong Hyun Chang, Nichola M. Kinsinger, William Ueng, Sharon L. Walker, André E. Nel

ACS Nano· Volume 9· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Although copper-containing nanoparticles are used in commercial products such as fungicides and bactericides, we presently do not understand the environmental impact on other organisms that may be inadvertently exposed. In this study, we used the zebrafish embryo as a screening tool to study the potential impact of two nano Cu-based materials, CuPRO and Kocide, in comparison to nanosized and micron-sized Cu and CuO particles in their pristine form (0-10 ppm) as well as following their transformation in an experimental wastewater treatment system. This was accomplished by construction of a modeled domestic septic tank system from which effluents could be retrieved at different stages following particle introduction (10 ppm). The Cu speciation in the effluent was identified as nondissolvable inorganic Cu(H2PO2)2 and nondiffusible organic Cu by X-ray diffraction, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT), and Visual MINTEQ software. While the nanoscale materials, including the commercial particles, were clearly more potent (showing 50% hatching interference above 0.5 ppm) than the micron-scale particulates with no effect on hatching up to 10 ppm, the Cu released from the particles in the septic tank underwent transformation into nonbioavailable species that failed to interfere with the function of the zebrafish embryo hatching enzyme. Moreover, we demonstrate that the addition of humic acid, as an organic carbon component, could lead to a dose-dependent decrease in Cu toxicity in our high content zebrafish embryo screening assay. Thus, the use of zebrafish embryo screening, in combination with the effluents obtained from a modeled exposure environment, enables a bioassay approach to follow the change in the speciation and hazard potential of Cu particles instead of difficult-to-perform direct particle tracking.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology, California NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States

Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California 92521, United States

Funding

National Science Foundation · Environmental Protection Agency

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Adeleye A. S. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 48 · 1256110.1021/es5033426 ↗
2. Thomas K. · Appl. Organomet. Chem. · 1999 · 13 · 45310.1002/(SICI)1099-0739(199906)13:6<453::AID-AOC864>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
3. Ribolzi O. · Environ. Pollut. · 2002 · 117 · 26110.1016/S0269-7491(01)00274-3 ↗
4. Giesy J. P. · Sci. Total Environ. · 1983 · 28 · 2310.1016/S0048-9697(83)80005-9 ↗
5. Arias M. · Soil Sci. · 2004 · 169 · 79610.1097/01.ss.0000148739.82992.59 ↗
6. Ren G. · Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents · 2009 · 33 · 58710.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.12.004 ↗
7. Cioffi N. · Chem. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 525510.1021/cm0505244 ↗
8. Lin S. · Small · 2013 · 9 · 160810.1002/smll.201202115 ↗
9. Fako V. E. · Adv. Drug. Delivery Rev. · 2009 · 61 · 47810.1016/j.addr.2009.03.008 ↗
10. Lowry G. V. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 46 · 689310.1021/es300839e ↗
11. Klaine S. J. · Environ. Toxicol. Chem. · 2008 · 27 · 182510.1897/08-090.1 ↗
12. Mueller N. C. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 42 · 444710.1021/es7029637 ↗
13. Nowack B. · Nano Today · 2009 · 4 · 1110.1016/j.nantod.2008.10.001 ↗
14. Beaudrie C. E. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 47 · 552410.1021/es303591x ↗
15. Keller A. A. · Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. · 2014 · 1 · 6510.1021/ez400106t ↗
16. EPA. Decentralized Systems Technology Fact Sheet Septic Tank - Soil Absorption Systems; Washington DC, 1999.
17. EPA. Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems: Memorandum of Understanding; Washington DC, 2011.
18. Benn T. M. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 42 · 413310.1021/es7032718 ↗
19. Choi O. · Water Res. · 2008 · 42 · 306610.1016/j.watres.2008.02.021 ↗
20. García A. · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2012 · 199 · 6410.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.057 ↗
21. Jarvie H. P. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 862210.1021/es901399q ↗
22. Kaegi R. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 390210.1021/es1041892 ↗
23. Kiser M. A. · Water Res. · 2010 · 44 · 410510.1016/j.watres.2010.05.036 ↗
24. Kiser M. A. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 675710.1021/es901102n ↗
25. Limbach L. K. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 42 · 582810.1021/es800091f ↗
26. Mu H. · Bioresour. Technol. · 2011 · 102 · 1030510.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.100 ↗
27. Sheng Z. · Water Res. · 2011 · 45 · 603910.1016/j.watres.2011.08.065 ↗
28. Zheng X. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 282610.1021/es2000744 ↗
29. Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972. In Pubic Law 92-500, Ed. 1972.
30. EPA. Manual for Evaluating Public Drinking Water Supplies; Washington, D.C. 1971.
31. EPA. National Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Washington, D.C. 1976.
32. EPA. NPDES Permit Writers’ Manual. EPA-833-B-96-003; Washington, D.C. 1996.
33. EPA. Centralized Waste Treatment Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Pretreatment Standards (40 CFR 437); Washington, D.C. 2001.
34. EPA. Protecting the Nation’s Waters Through Effective NPDES Permits A Strategic Plan FY 2001 and Beyond; Washington, D.C. 2001.
35. EPA. Alternative Waste Management Techniques for Best Practicable Waste Treatment; Washington, D.C, 1976; Vol.43, pp6190–6191.
36. EPA. The Report to Congress: Waste Disposal Practices and Their Effects on Ground Water EPA 570/9-77-001; Washington, D.C, June 1977.
37. Canter L. W. · 1985
38. Lin S. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 728410.1021/nn202116p ↗
39. Lin S. · Small · 2013 · 9 · 177610.1002/smll.201202128 ↗
40. Xia T. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 122310.1021/nn1028482 ↗
41. Wang X. · Small · 2014 · 10 · 38510.1002/smll.201301597 ↗
42. Liu R. · PLoS One · 2012 · 7 · e3501410.1371/journal.pone.0035014 ↗
43. Amato E. D. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 48 · 448510.1021/es404850f ↗
44. Luider C. D. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2004 · 38 · 286510.1021/es030566y ↗
45. Cuppett J. D. · Chem. Senses · 2006 · 31 · 68910.1093/chemse/bjl010 ↗
46. Pagenkopf G. K. · J. Fish. Res. Board Can. · 1974 · 31 · 46210.1139/f74-077 ↗
47. Stauber J. L. · Mar. Biol. · 1987 · 94 · 51110.1007/BF00431397 ↗
48. Flemming C. A. · Water Air Soil Pullut. · 1989 · 44 · 14310.1007/BF00228784 ↗
49. McIntyre J. K. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 42 · 135210.1021/es071603e ↗
50. Breault R. F. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 1996 · 30 · 347710.1021/es9601301 ↗
51. Linbo T. L. · Environ. Toxicol. Chem. · 2009 · 28 · 145510.1897/08-283.1 ↗
52. Hoffman S. R. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2007 · 41 · 699610.1021/es070958v ↗
53. Gaetke L. · Toxicology · 2003 · 189 · 14710.1016/S0300-483X(03)00159-8 ↗
54. Cooper C. A. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 48 · 121310.1021/es402186w ↗
55. Kiaune L. · Rev. Envrion. Contam. Toxicol. · 2011 · 213 · 1
56. Marcus I. M. · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 2013 · 79 · 255210.1128/AEM.03461-12 ↗
57. Keller A. · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2013 · 15 · 110.1007/s11051-013-1692-4 ↗
58. Lazareva A. · ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. · 2014 · 2 · 165610.1021/sc500121w ↗
59. Gustafsson, J. P.Visual MINTEQ, ver. 3.0, 2010.http://www2.lwr.kth.se/English/OurSoftware/vminteq/.