journal article·2013-04-23Open access

Design Principles for Clinical Efficacy of Cancer Nanomedicine: A Look into the Basics

Shiladitya Sengupta, Ashish Kulkarni

ACS Nano· Volume 7· Issue 4

Abstract

With recent advances in cancer nanomedicine, there is an increasing expectation for clinical translation. However, what are the parameters of a nanomedicine that will define clinical success, which will be measured by increased efficacy and not just ease of delivery or reduction in toxicity? In this Perspective, we build on a fundamental study by Stefanick et al. on the significance of the design principles in the engineering of a nanomedicine, such as peptide-PEG-linker length and ligand density in cellular uptake of liposomal nanoparticles. We address additional design parameters that can potentially facilitate clinical translation as well as how emerging insights into tumor biology will inspire next-generation cancer nanomedicines.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Nanomedicine, Division of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Science Technology, Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Center, 65 Landsdowne Street, Room 317, Boston, Massachusetts 02139, United States

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Juliano R. · Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery · 2013 · 12 · 17110.1038/nrd3958 ↗
2. Venditto V. J. · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2013 · 65 · 8010.1016/j.addr.2012.09.038 ↗
3. Duncan R. · Mol. Pharmaceutics · 2011 · 8 · 210110.1021/mp200394t ↗
4. Teicher B. A. · Clin. Cancer Res. · 2011 · 17 · 638910.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1417 ↗
5. Lasic D. D. · Science · 1995 · 267 · 127510.1126/science.7871422 ↗
6. Hawkins M. J. · Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2008 · 60 · 87610.1016/j.addr.2007.08.044 ↗
7. 10.1021/nn305663e10.1021/nn305663e ↗
8. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-456110.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4561 ↗
9. Gref R. · Colloids Surf., B · 2000 · 18 · 30110.1016/S0927-7765(99)00156-3 ↗
10. Perry J. L. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 530410.1021/nl302638g ↗
11. Seetharamu N. · Anticancer Res. · 2010 · 30 · 541
12. Ng S. S. · Clin. Cancer Res. · 2006 · 12 · 433110.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2762 ↗
13. Sugahara K. N. · Cancer Cell. · 2009 · 16 · 51010.1016/j.ccr.2009.10.013 ↗
14. Demers M. · Oncoimmunology · 2012 · 1 · 10010.4161/onci.1.1.17962 ↗
15. Wang J. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 574510.1021/nn3028997 ↗
16. Beck A. · Discovery Med. · 2010 · 10 · 329
17. Cheng J. · Mol. Pharmaceutics · 2004 · 1 · 18310.1021/mp049966y ↗
18. Sengupta P. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2012 · 109 · 1129410.1073/pnas.1203129109 ↗
19. Marusyk A. · Science · 2013 · 339 · 52810.1126/science.1234415 ↗
20. Lee M. J. · Cell · 2012 · 149 · 78010.1016/j.cell.2012.03.031 ↗