journal article·2015-04-28

Engineering Cortical Neuron Polarity with Nanomagnets on a Chip

Anja Kunze, Peter Tseng, Chanya Godzich, Coleman Murray, Anna Caputo, Felix E. Schweizer, Dino Di Carlo

ACS Nano· Volume 9· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Intra- and extracellular signaling play critical roles in cell polarity, ultimately leading to the development of functional cell-cell connections, tissues, and organs. In the brain, pathologically oriented neurons are often the cause for disordered circuits, severely impacting motor function, perception, and memory. Aside from control through gene expression and signaling pathways, it is known that nervous system development can be manipulated by mechanical stimuli (e.g., outgrowth of axons through externally applied forces). The inverse is true as well: intracellular molecular signals can be converted into forces to yield axonal outgrowth. The complete role played by mechanical signals in mediating single-cell polarity, however, remains currently unclear. Here we employ highly parallelized nanomagnets on a chip to exert local mechanical stimuli on cortical neurons, independently of the amount of superparamagnetic nanoparticles taken up by the cells. The chip-based approach was utilized to quantify the effect of nanoparticle-mediated forces on the intracellular cytoskeleton as visualized by the distribution of the microtubule-associated protein tau. While single cortical neurons prefer to assemble tau proteins following poly-L-lysine surface cues, an optimal force range of 4.5-70 pN by the nanomagnets initiated a tau distribution opposed to the pattern cue. In larger cell clusters (groups comprising six or more cells), nanoparticle-mediated forces induced tau repositioning in an observed range of 190-270 pN, and initiation of magnetic field-directed cell displacement was observed at forces above 300 pN. Our findings lay the groundwork for high-resolution mechanical encoding of neural networks in vitro, mechanically driven cell polarization in brain tissues, and neurotherapeutic approaches using functionalized superparamagnetic nanoparticles to potentially restore disordered neural circuits.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Photoreceptor and optogenetics research · Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Bioengineering, ‡California NanoSystems Institute, and §Department of Neurobiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States

Funding

NIH Office of the Director · Schweizerische Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Shelly M. · Neuron · 2011 · 71 · 43310.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.041 ↗
2. Halder G. · Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. · 2012 · 13 · 59110.1038/nrm3416 ↗
3. Mammoto T. · Development · 2010 · 137 · 140710.1242/dev.024166 ↗
4. Hilgetag C. C. · Anat. Embryol. · 2005 · 210 · 41110.1007/s00429-005-0041-5 ↗
5. Howard J. · Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. · 2011 · 12 · 39210.1038/nrm3120 ↗
6. Franze K. · Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. · 2013 · 15 · 22710.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150045 ↗
7. Stiess M. · Dev. Neurobiol. · 2011 · 71 · 43010.1002/dneu.20849 ↗
8. Bradke F. · Neuron · 1997 · 19 · 117510.1016/S0896-6273(00)80410-9 ↗
9. Vaccarino F. M. · Biol. Psychiatry · 2009 · 66 · 31310.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.013 ↗
10. Bullmore E. · Nat. Rev. Neurosci. · 2009 · 10 · 18610.1038/nrn2575 ↗
11. Alivisatos A. P. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 185010.1021/nn4012847 ↗
12. Roy J. · Lab Chip · 2013 · 13 · 49810.1039/c2lc41002h ↗
13. Millet L. J. · Trends Neurosci. · 2013 · 35 · 75210.1016/j.tins.2012.09.001 ↗
14. Sun Y. · Biointerphases · 2012 · 7 · 110.1007/s13758-011-0001-y ↗
15. Millet L. J. · Lab Chip · 2010 · 10 · 152510.1039/c001552k ↗
16. Bhattacharjee N. · Integr. Biol. · 2011 · 2 · 66910.1039/c0ib00038h ↗
17. Esch T. · J. Neurosci. · 1999 · 19 · 641710.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-15-06417.1999 ↗
18. Jee J. M. · J. Neural Eng. · 2012 · 9 · 1
19. Fricke R. · Biomaterials · 2012 · 32 · 207010.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.11.036 ↗
20. Scott M. A. · Lab Chip · 2012 · 12 · 226510.1039/c2lc21105j ↗
21. Hilgetag C. C. · PLoS Comput. Biol. · 2006 · 2 · 14610.1371/journal.pcbi.0020022 ↗
22. Bok S. T. · 1959 · 1
23. Tyler W. J. · Nat. Rev. Neurosci. · 2012 · 13 · 86710.1038/nrn3383 ↗
24. Fuhs T. · Cytoskeleton · 2013 · 70 · 4410.1002/cm.21080 ↗
25. Fass J. N. · Biophys. J. · 2003 · 85 · 62310.1016/S0006-3495(03)74506-8 ↗
26. Pfister B. J. · J. Neurosci. · 2004 · 24 · 797810.1523/JNEUROSCI.1974-04.2004 ↗
27. Lamoureux P. · J. Vis. Exp. · 2011 · e2509
28. Bernick K. B. · Acta Biomater. · 2011 · 7 · 121010.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.018 ↗
29. Nguyen T. D. · Lab Chip · 2013 · 13 · 373510.1039/c3lc50681a ↗
30. Lamoureux P. · J. Cell Biol. · 2002 · 159 · 49910.1083/jcb.200207174 ↗
31. Bray D. · Dev. Biol. · 1984 · 102 · 37910.1016/0012-1606(84)90202-1 ↗
32. de Vries A. H. B. · Biophys. J. · 2005 · 88 · 213710.1529/biophysj.104.052035 ↗
33. Tseng P. · Nat. Methods · 2012 · 9 · 111310.1038/nmeth.2210 ↗
34. Wang E. C. · Integr. Biol. · 2014 · 6 · 910.1039/c3ib40165k ↗
35. Etoc F. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 19310.1038/nnano.2013.23 ↗
36. Steketee M. B. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2011 · 108 · 1904210.1073/pnas.1019624108 ↗
37. Pinkernelle J. · BMC Neurosci. · 2012 · 13 · 3210.1186/1471-2202-13-32 ↗
38. Riggio C. · Int. J. Nanomed. · 2012 · 7 · 3155
39. Yue Z.-G. · Biomacromolecules · 2011 · 12 · 244010.1021/bm101482r ↗
40. Riggio C. · Nanomedicine: NBM · 2014 · 10 · 154910.1016/j.nano.2013.12.008 ↗
41. Pai J.-H. · Anal. Chem. · 2007 · 79 · 877410.1021/ac071528q ↗
42. Cheng Q. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2010 · 96 · 507
43. Detrait E. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 1999 · 45 · 40410.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990615)45:4<404::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
44. Mahmud G. · Nat. Phys. · 2009 · 5 · 60610.1038/nphys1306 ↗
45. Arimura N. · Nat. Rev. Neurosci. · 2007 · 8 · 19410.1038/nrn2056 ↗
46. Roth S. · PLoS One · 2012 · 7 · e3362310.1371/journal.pone.0033623 ↗
47. Konzack S. · J. Neurosci. · 2007 · 27 · 991610.1523/JNEUROSCI.0927-07.2007 ↗
48. Frandemiche M. L. · J. Neurosci. · 2014 · 34 · 608410.1523/JNEUROSCI.4261-13.2014 ↗
49. Gomez N. · J. R. Soc., Interface · 2007 · 4 · 22310.1098/rsif.2006.0171 ↗
50. Shelly M. · Science · 2010 · 327 · 54710.1126/science.1179735 ↗
51. Sapir T. · Hum. Mol. Genet. · 2012 · 21 · 168110.1093/hmg/ddr603 ↗
52. Sakakibara A. · Open Biol. · 2013 · 3 · 110.1098/rsob.130061 ↗
53. Hatch G. P. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2001 · 225 · 26210.1016/S0304-8853(00)01250-6 ↗
54. Spedden E. · Biophys. J. · 2012 · 103 · 86810.1016/j.bpj.2012.08.005 ↗
55. Blaire G. · Eur. Phys. J. B · 2013 · 86 · 110.1140/epjb/e2013-30679-1 ↗
56. Shevkoplyas S. S. · Lab Chip · 2007 · 7 · 129410.1039/b705045c ↗
57. Meijering E. · 2012 · 504 · 183
58. Schaeffer E. · Langmuir · 2007 · 23 · 365410.1021/la0622368 ↗
59. Cheng Q. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2011 · 96 · 50710.1002/jbm.a.32992 ↗
60. Nakai J. · Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. · 1959 · 51 · 10810.1007/BF00345083 ↗