Two-Dimensional Short-Range Disordered Crystalline Networks from Flexible Molecular Modules
Source abstract
Abstract
Studies of complex condensed matter systems have led to the discovery of materials of unexpected spatial organization as glasses, glassy crystals, quasicrystals, and protein and virus crystals. Here, we present two-dimensional (2D) short-range disordered molecular crystalline networks, which, regarding spatial organization, can be considered as surface analogues of 3D glassy crystals. In particular, the deposition of a flexible molecular module on Cu(111) gives rise to distinct phases whose characteristics have been examined in real space by scanning tunneling microscopy: a 2D short-range distortional disordered crystalline network and a 2D short-range orientational disordered crystalline network, respectively. Both phases exhibit a random arrangement of nanopores that are stabilized by the simultaneous presence of metal-organic and pyridyl-pyridyl interactions. The 2D short-range distortional disordered crystalline network displayed intriguing flexibility, as probed by the STM tip that modifies the pore shape, a prerequisite for adaptive behavior in host-guest processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Chemistry and Catalysis · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Physik Department E20, Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany
Department of Chemistry, University of Namur, Rue de Bruxelles 61, B-5000, Namur, Belgium
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazzale Europa 1, I-34127, Trieste, Italy
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Angell C. A. · Science · 1995 · 267 · 192410.1126/science.267.5206.1924 ↗
2. Debenedetti P. G. · Nature · 2001 · 410 · 25910.1038/35065704 ↗
3. Chandler D. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2009 · 106 · 1511110.1073/pnas.0908029106 ↗
4. Shechtman D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1984 · 53 · 195110.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1951 ↗
5. Ilari A. · Methods Mol. Biol. · 2008 · 452 · 6310.1007/978-1-60327-159-2_3 ↗
6. Fry E. E. · Mol. Biotechnol. · 1999 · 12 · 1310.1385/MB:12:1:13 ↗
7. Steurer W. · Acta Crystallogr. · 2007 · 64 · 110.1107/S0108767307038627 ↗
8. Zallen R. · 2004
9. Adachi K. · Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. · 1968 · 41 · 107310.1246/bcsj.41.1073 ↗
10. Foulon M. · J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. · 1983 · 16 · L26510.1088/0022-3719/16/10/002 ↗
11. Pathmanathan K. · J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. · 1985 · 18 · 653510.1088/0022-3719/18/35/018 ↗
12. Lefebvre J. · J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. · 1985 · 18 · 24110.1088/0022-3719/18/2/005 ↗
13. Descamps M. · Phys. A · 1993 · 201 · 34610.1016/0378-4371(93)90432-4 ↗
14. Willart J. F. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1996 · 104 · 250810.1063/1.470999 ↗
15. Delcourt O. · Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 215 · 5110.1016/S0301-0104(96)00331-X ↗
16. Kuchta B. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1998 · 109 · 675310.1063/1.477321 ↗
17. Brand R. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 116 · 1038610.1063/1.1477186 ↗
18. Barth J. V. · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2007 · 58 · 37510.1146/annurev.physchem.56.092503.141259 ↗
19. Otero R. · Surf. Sci. · 2008 · 319 · 312
20. Marschall M. · Nat. Chem. · 2010 · 2 · 13110.1038/nchem.503 ↗
21. Blunt M. O. · Science · 2008 · 322 · 107710.1126/science.1163338 ↗
22. Pivetta M. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2008 · 47 · 107610.1002/anie.200704479 ↗
23. Whitesides G. M. · Science · 1991 · 254 · 131210.1126/science.1962191 ↗
24. Kriwacki R. W. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 1996 · 93 · 1150410.1073/pnas.93.21.11504 ↗
25. Mittag T. · J. Mol. Recognit. · 2010 · 23 · 10510.1002/jmr.961 ↗
26. Horike S. · Nat. Chem. · 2009 · 1 · 69510.1038/nchem.444 ↗
27. Tait S. L. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1098210.1021/jp071100v ↗
28. Eichberger M. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 460810.1021/nl802995u ↗
29. Heim D. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 10 · 12210.1021/nl9029994 ↗
30. Heim D. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 678310.1021/ja1010527 ↗
31. Shi Z. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 615010.1021/ja2010434 ↗
32. Écija D. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 493610.1021/nn1013337 ↗
33. Piot L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1286410.1021/ja902621t ↗
34. According toEliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H.InStereochemistry of Organic Compounds; 1994; pp19–20, “the most fundamental distinction one can make between configuration and conformation, is to say that configurational differences imply differences in bond angles, whereas conformational differences involve differences in torsion angles (including in both case, differences, that are exclusively in sign).” On the basis of this distinction, molecules of identical constitution but differing in bond angles (cf.Figure1h) can be thus considered configurational isomers.
35. Zhang X. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 568510.1021/nn101727u ↗
36. Perry C. C. · Surf. Sci. · 1998 · 409 · 51210.1016/S0039-6028(98)00294-5 ↗
37. Lin N. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2002 · 41 · 477910.1002/anie.200290046 ↗
38. Classen T. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2005 · 44 · 614210.1002/anie.200502007 ↗
39. Schlickum U. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 381310.1021/nl072466m ↗
40. Klappenberger F. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 129 · 21470210.1063/1.3021291 ↗
41. Palma C.-A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 1306210.1021/ja9032428 ↗
42. 2004
43. Soubatch S. · Langmuir · 2006 · 22 · 957210.1021/la061440s ↗
44. Liu J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 1876010.1021/ja2056193 ↗
45. Lin N. · Top. Curr. Chem. · 2009 · 287 · 1
46. Barth J. V. · Surf. Sci. · 2009 · 603 · 153310.1016/j.susc.2008.09.049 ↗
47. Auwärter W. · Int. J. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 5 · 117110.1504/IJNT.2008.019836 ↗