Optically Induced Tunable Magnetization Dynamics in Nanoscale Co Antidot Lattices
Source abstract
Abstract
We report the time-domain measurements of optically induced precessional dynamics in a series of Co antidot lattices with fixed antidot diameter of 100 nm and with varying lattice constants (S) between 200 and 500 nm. For the sparsest lattice, we observe two bands of precessional modes with a band gap, which increases substantially with the decrease in S down to 300 nm. At S = 200 nm, four distinct bands with significant band gaps appear. The numerically calculated mode profiles show various localized and extended modes with the propagation direction perpendicular to the bias magnetic field. We numerically demonstrate some composite antidot structures with very rich magnonic spectra spreading between 3 and 27 GHz based upon the above experimental observation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Condensed Matter Physics and Material Sciences, S. N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences, Block JD, Sector III, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700 098, India
Advanced Science Institute, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
Frontier Research Academy for Young Researchers, Kyushu Institute of Technology, lizuka, Fukuoka, 820-8502, Japan
Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8581, Japan
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Kern K. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1991 · 66 · 161810.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1618 ↗
2. Diwekar M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 311210.1063/1.1712027 ↗
3. Ctistis G. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 110.1021/nl801811t ↗
4. Torres L. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 564510.1063/1.372476 ↗
5. Wang C. C. · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 162910.1088/0957-4484/17/6/015 ↗
6. Neusser S. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 292710.1002/adma.200900809 ↗
7. Kruglyak V. V. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 26400110.1088/0022-3727/43/26/264001 ↗
8. Chumak A. V. · Nat. Commun. · 2010 · 1 · 14110.1038/ncomms1142 ↗
9. Ma F. S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 15310710.1063/1.3579531 ↗
10. Duerr G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 20250210.1063/1.3662841 ↗
11. Yu M. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 09F50110.1063/1.2709501 ↗
12. Yu C. T. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 632210.1063/1.372693 ↗
13. Toporov A. Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 306310.1063/1.1323737 ↗
14. Tacchi S. · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2010 · 46 · 17210.1109/TMAG.2009.2033206 ↗
15. Tacchi S. · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2010 · 46 · 144010.1109/TMAG.2009.2039775 ↗
16. Neusser S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 09445410.1103/PhysRevB.84.094454 ↗
17. Neusser S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 06720810.1103/PhysRevLett.105.067208 ↗
18. Neusser S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 12250110.1063/1.2988290 ↗
19. McPhail S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 09441410.1103/PhysRevB.72.094414 ↗
20. Martyanov O. N. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 17442910.1103/PhysRevB.75.174429 ↗
21. Kostylev M. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 07C50710.1063/1.2831792 ↗
22. Grimes C. A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 81 · 472010.1063/1.365539 ↗
23. Ding J. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07D30410.1063/1.3535425 ↗
24. Ulrichs H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 09250610.1063/1.3483136 ↗
25. Neusser S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 05440610.1103/PhysRevB.78.054406 ↗
26. Barman A. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 19500210.1088/0022-3727/43/19/195002 ↗
27. Rana B. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 955910.1021/nn202791g ↗
28. Donahue, M.; Porter, D. G.OOMMF User’s guide, version 1.0, Interagency Report NISTIR 6376, National Institute of Standard and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1999; http://math.nist.gov/oommf.10.6028/NIST.IR.6376 ↗
29. Kumar D. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 45 · 01500110.1088/0022-3727/45/1/015001 ↗