Electric Polarization Properties of Single Bacteria Measured with Electrostatic Force Microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
We quantified the electrical polarization properties of single bacterial cells using electrostatic force microscopy. We found that the effective dielectric constant, ε(r,eff), for the four bacterial types investigated (Salmonella typhimurium, Escherchia coli, Lactobacilus sakei, and Listeria innocua) is around 3-5 under dry air conditions. Under ambient humidity, it increases to ε(r,eff) ∼ 6-7 for the Gram-negative bacterial types (S. typhimurium and E. coli) and to ε(r,eff) ∼ 15-20 for the Gram-positive ones (L. sakei and L. innocua). We show that the measured effective dielectric constants can be consistently interpreted in terms of the electric polarization properties of the biochemical components of the bacterial cell compartments and of their hydration state. These results demonstrate the potential of electrical studies of single bacterial cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya (IBEC), C/Baldiri i Reixac 11-15, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Departament d’Electronica, Universitat de Barcelona, C/Marti i Franqués, 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Departament de Microbiologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Funding
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Asami K. · Biophys. J. · 1980 · 31 · 21510.1016/S0006-3495(80)85052-1 ↗
2. Hölzel R. · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 1999 · 1450 · 5310.1016/S0167-4889(99)00036-1 ↗
3. Sanchis A. · Bioelectromagnetics · 2007 · 28 · 39310.1002/bem.20317 ↗
4. Fricke H. · Nature · 1956 · 187 · 13410.1038/177134a0 ↗
5. Mannoor M. S. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2010 · 107 · 1920710.1073/pnas.1008768107 ↗
6. Yang L. · Biotechnol. Adv. · 2008 · 26 · 13510.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.10.003 ↗
7. Bernabini C. · Lab Chip · 2011 · 11 · 40710.1039/C0LC00099J ↗
8. David F. · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2012 · 109 · 48310.1002/bit.23345 ↗
9. Castellarnau M. · Biophys. J. · 2006 · 91 · 393710.1529/biophysj.106.088534 ↗
10. Park S. · Anal. Chem. · 2009 · 81 · 230310.1021/ac802471g ↗
11. Fumagalli L. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 80810.1038/nmat3369 ↗
12. Fumagalli L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 18310710.1063/1.3427362 ↗
13. Giordano S. · Materials · 2009 · 2 · 141810.3390/ma2041417 ↗
14. Pethig R. · Phys. Med. Biol. · 1987 · 32 · 93310.1088/0031-9155/32/8/001 ↗
15. Simonson T. · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2003 · 66 · 73710.1088/0034-4885/66/5/202 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.140570211110.1073/pnas.1405702111 ↗
17. Benga G. · Life · 2009 · 61 · 112
18. Bai W. · Biophys. Chem. · 2006 · 122 · 13610.1016/j.bpc.2006.03.004 ↗