journal article·2014-10-28

Electric Polarization Properties of Single Bacteria Measured with Electrostatic Force Microscopy

Daniel Esteban-Ferrer, Martin A. Edwards, Laura Fumagalli, Antonio Juárez, Gabriel Gomila

ACS Nano· Volume 8· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

We quantified the electrical polarization properties of single bacterial cells using electrostatic force microscopy. We found that the effective dielectric constant, ε(r,eff), for the four bacterial types investigated (Salmonella typhimurium, Escherchia coli, Lactobacilus sakei, and Listeria innocua) is around 3-5 under dry air conditions. Under ambient humidity, it increases to ε(r,eff) ∼ 6-7 for the Gram-negative bacterial types (S. typhimurium and E. coli) and to ε(r,eff) ∼ 15-20 for the Gram-positive ones (L. sakei and L. innocua). We show that the measured effective dielectric constants can be consistently interpreted in terms of the electric polarization properties of the biochemical components of the bacterial cell compartments and of their hydration state. These results demonstrate the potential of electrical studies of single bacterial cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya (IBEC), C/Baldiri i Reixac 11-15, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

Departament d’Electronica, Universitat de Barcelona, C/Marti i Franqués, 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

Departament de Microbiologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Asami K. · Biophys. J. · 1980 · 31 · 21510.1016/S0006-3495(80)85052-1 ↗
2. Hölzel R. · Biochim. Biophys. Acta · 1999 · 1450 · 5310.1016/S0167-4889(99)00036-1 ↗
3. Sanchis A. · Bioelectromagnetics · 2007 · 28 · 39310.1002/bem.20317 ↗
4. Fricke H. · Nature · 1956 · 187 · 13410.1038/177134a0 ↗
5. Mannoor M. S. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2010 · 107 · 1920710.1073/pnas.1008768107 ↗
6. Yang L. · Biotechnol. Adv. · 2008 · 26 · 13510.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.10.003 ↗
7. Bernabini C. · Lab Chip · 2011 · 11 · 40710.1039/C0LC00099J ↗
8. David F. · Biotechnol. Bioeng. · 2012 · 109 · 48310.1002/bit.23345 ↗
9. Castellarnau M. · Biophys. J. · 2006 · 91 · 393710.1529/biophysj.106.088534 ↗
10. Park S. · Anal. Chem. · 2009 · 81 · 230310.1021/ac802471g ↗
11. Fumagalli L. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 80810.1038/nmat3369 ↗
12. Fumagalli L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 18310710.1063/1.3427362 ↗
13. Giordano S. · Materials · 2009 · 2 · 141810.3390/ma2041417 ↗
14. Pethig R. · Phys. Med. Biol. · 1987 · 32 · 93310.1088/0031-9155/32/8/001 ↗
15. Simonson T. · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2003 · 66 · 73710.1088/0034-4885/66/5/202 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.140570211110.1073/pnas.1405702111 ↗
17. Benga G. · Life · 2009 · 61 · 112
18. Bai W. · Biophys. Chem. · 2006 · 122 · 13610.1016/j.bpc.2006.03.004 ↗