journal article·2013-07-23Open access

Sorting Inactivated Cells Using Cell-Imprinted Polymer Thin Films

Kangning Ren, Niaz Banaei, Richard N. Zare

ACS Nano· Volume 7· Issue 7

Abstract

Previous work showed that cell imprinting in a poly(dimethylsiloxane) film produced artificial receptors to cells by template-assisted rearrangement of functional groups on the surface of the polymer thin film which facilitated cell capture in the polymer surface indentations by size, shape, and, most importantly, chemical recognition. We report here that inactivation of cells by treatment with formaldehyde (4%), glutaraldehyde (2%), or a combination of the two leads to markedly improved capture selectivity (a factor of 3) when cells to be analyzed are inactivated in the same manner. The enhanced capture efficiency compared to living cells results from two factors: (1) rigidification of the cell surface through cross-linking of amine groups by the aldehyde; and (2) elimination of chemicals excreted from living cells which interfere with the fidelity of the cell-imprinting process. Moreover, cell inactivation has the advantage of removing biohazard risks associated with working with virulent bacteria. These results are demonstrated using different strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications · Biosensors and Analytical Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5080, United States,

Departments of Pathology and Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California 94304, United States

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Aherne A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1996 · 118 · 877110.1021/ja960123c ↗
2. Schirhagl R. · Analyst · 2012 · 137 · 149510.1039/c2an15927a ↗
3. Ren K. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 431410.1021/nn300901z ↗
4. Schirhagl R. · Sci. China Chem. · 2012 · 55 · 110.1007/s11426-012-4544-7 ↗
5. Schirhagl R. · Sens. Actuators, B · 2012 · 173 · 58510.1016/j.snb.2012.07.036 ↗
6. The Top 10 Causes of Death.World Health Organization (2011, Fact sheet No. 310.
7. Gilbert G. L. · Trends Mol. Med. · 2002 · 8 · 28010.1016/S1471-4914(02)02349-3 ↗
8. Lahann J. · Anal. Chem. · 2003 · 75 · 211710.1021/ac020557s ↗
9. Sekine J. · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 478810.1002/adma.201102151 ↗
10. Kretzer J. W. · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 2007 · 73 · 199210.1128/AEM.02402-06 ↗
11. Jenik M. · Biosens. Bioelectron. · 2009 · 25 · 910.1016/j.bios.2009.01.019 ↗
12. Tuberculosis.World Health Organization (2012, Fact sheet No. 104.
13. Chan E. D. · Tuber. Lung Dis. · 2000 · 80 · 13110.1054/tuld.2000.0243 ↗
14. Best M. · J. Clin. Microbiol. · 1990 · 28 · 223410.1128/jcm.28.10.2234-2239.1990 ↗
15. Chang J. C. H. · Appl. Environ. Microbiol. · 1985 · 49 · 136110.1128/aem.49.6.1361-1365.1985 ↗
16. Donaghy J. · Lett. Appl. Microbiol. · 2009 · 49 · 21710.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02644.x ↗
17. Fusillo M. H. · Am. J. Clin. Pathol. · 1968 · 49 · 75310.1093/ajcp/49.5_ts.753 ↗
18. Bintsis T. · J. Sci. Food Agric. · 2000 · 80 · 63710.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(20000501)80:6<637::AID-JSFA603>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
19. Maunsbac A. B. · J. Ultrastruct. Res. · 1966 · 15 · 24210.1016/S0022-5320(66)80109-0 ↗
20. Doughty M. J. · Tissue Cell · 1995 · 27 · 70110.1016/S0040-8166(05)80025-4 ↗
21. Chao Y. · Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. · 2011 · 92 · 38110.1007/s00253-011-3551-5 ↗
22. Doughty M. J. · Tissue Cell · 1997 · 29 · 53310.1016/S0040-8166(97)80054-7 ↗