journal article·2013-01-22

Very Stable Electron Field Emission from Strontium Titanate Coated Carbon Nanotube Matrices with Low Emission Thresholds

Archana Pandey, Abhishek Prasad, Jason P. Moscatello, Mark Engelhard, Chongmin Wang, Yoke Khin Yap

ACS Nano· Volume 7· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Novel PMMA-STO-CNT matrices were created by opened-tip vertically aligned multiwalled carbon nanotubes (VA-MWCNTs) with conformal coatings of strontium titanate (STO) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Emission threshold of 0.8 V/μm was demonstrated, about 5-fold lower than that of the as-grown VA-MWCNTs. This was obtained after considering the related band structures under the perspective of work functions and tunneling width as a function of the STO thickness. We showed that there is an optimum thickness of STO coatings to effectively reduce the work function of CNTs and yet minimize the tunneling width for electron emissions. Furthermore, simulation and modeling suggest that PMMA-STO-CNT matrices have suppressed screening effects and Coulombs' repulsion forces between electrons in adjacent CNTs, leading to low emission threshold, high emission density, and prolonged emission stability. These findings are important for practical application of VA-MWCNTs in field emission devices, X-ray generation, and wave amplification.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, 118 Fisher Hall, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, Michigan 49931, United States

Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. de Heer W. A. · Science · 1995 · 270 · 117910.1126/science.270.5239.1179 ↗
2. Collins P. G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 196910.1063/1.117638 ↗
3. Choi W. B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 75 · 312910.1063/1.125253 ↗
4. Nilsson L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 207110.1063/1.126258 ↗
5. Han I. T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 207010.1063/1.1506408 ↗
6. Bonard J. M. · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 115406 (1–10)
7. Dean K. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 187310.1063/1.1402157 ↗
8. Kayastha V. K. · Nanotechnology · 2007 · 18 · 035206-4A10.1088/0957-4484/18/3/035206 ↗
9. Pandey A. · Carbon · 2010 · 48 · 28710.1016/j.carbon.2009.09.031 ↗
10. Shiraishi M. · Carbon · 2001 · 39 · 191310.1016/S0008-6223(00)00322-5 ↗
11. Maus-Friedrichs W. · Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 515 · 49910.1016/S0039-6028(02)01968-4 ↗
12. Pontes F. M. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 35 · 478310.1023/A:1004816611050 ↗
13. Yi W. · Adv. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 146410.1002/1521-4095(20021016)14:20<1464::AID-ADMA1464>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
14. Lee J. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 2008 · 26 · 189210.1116/1.3006020 ↗
15. Zhang J. · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 25710.1088/0957-4484/17/1/043 ↗
16. Jin F. · Carbon · 2007 · 45 · 58710.1016/j.carbon.2006.10.014 ↗
17. Menda J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 173106-310.1063/1.2115068 ↗
18. Chakrabarti S. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 46 · 436410.1143/JJAP.46.4364 ↗
19. Schlesser R. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 82 · 576310.1063/1.366442 ↗
20. van Benthem K. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 615610.1063/1.1415766 ↗
21. Givargizov E. I. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1995 · 87 · 2410.1016/0169-4332(94)00532-X ↗
22. Fowler R. H. · Proc. R. Soc. A · 1928 · 119 · 173
23. Tanaka H. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 43 · 86410.1143/JJAP.43.864 ↗
24. Pandey A. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 676010.1021/nn100925g ↗
25. Futaba D. N. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 279610.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.043 ↗
26. Lee J. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 388910.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.033 ↗
27. Perea-López N. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 507210.1021/nn201149y ↗
28. Kim W. J. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 42910.1021/nn101956w ↗