Engineered Magnetic Shape Anisotropy in BiFeO3–CoFe2O4 Self-Assembled Thin Films
Source abstract
Abstract
We report growth of various phase architectures of self-assembled BiFeO3-CoFe2O4 (BFO-CFO) thin films on differently oriented SrTiO3 (STO) substrates. CFO forms segregated square, stripe, and triangular nanopillars embedded in a coherent BFO matrix on (001)-, (110)-, and (111)-oriented STO substrates, respectively. Nanostructures with an aspect ratio of up to 5:1 with a prominent magnetic anisotropy were obtained on both (001) and (110) STO along out-of-plane and in-plane directions. Magnetic easy axis rotation from in-plane to out-of-plane directions was realized through aspect ratio control. An intractable in-plane anisotropy was fixed in CFO on (111) STO due to the triangular shape of the ferromagnetic phase nanopillars. These studies established a detailed relationship of magnetic anisotropy with specific shape and dimensions of ordered magnetic arrays. The results suggest a way to effectively control the magnetic anisotropy in patterned ferromagnetic oxide arrays with tunable shape, aspect ratio, and elastic strain conditions of the nanostructures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Magnetic properties of thin films · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Ramesh R. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 2110.1038/nmat1805 ↗
2. Eerenstein W. · Nature · 2000 · 442 · 75910.1038/nature05023 ↗
3. Gao X. S. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 345010.1002/adfm.200900422 ↗
4. Zheng H. · Science · 2004 · 303 · 66110.1126/science.1094207 ↗
5. Zheng H. M. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 140110.1021/nl060401y ↗
6. Eerenstein W. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 34810.1038/nmat1886 ↗
7. Zavaliche F. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 179310.1021/nl051406i ↗
8. Liao S. C. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 411810.1021/nn200880t ↗
9. Fannin P. C. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 27 · 18510.1088/0022-3727/27/2/001 ↗
10. Leslie-Pelecky D. L. · Chem. Mater. · 1996 · 8 · 177010.1021/cm960077f ↗
11. Cowburn R. P. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 33 · R110.1088/0022-3727/33/1/201 ↗
12. Gubin S. P. · Russ. Chem. Rev. · 2005 · 74 · 48910.1070/RC2005v074n06ABEH000897 ↗
13. Srikala D. · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 10 · 808810.1166/jnn.2010.3011 ↗
14. Takamura Y. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 128710.1021/nl060615f ↗
15. Yan L. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2009 · 44 · 508010.1007/s10853-009-3679-1 ↗
16. Bozorth R. M. · Phys. Rev. · 1955 · 99 · 178810.1103/PhysRev.99.1788 ↗
17. Dix N. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 495510.1021/nn101546r ↗
18. Comes R. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 07D91410.1063/1.3676413 ↗
19. Wang Z. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 04311010.1063/1.3619836 ↗
20. Zheng H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 11311310.1063/1.2713131 ↗
21. Cullity B. D. · 2009
22. Jun Y. W. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 573210.1021/ja0422155 ↗
23. Park J. I. · Chem. Phys. Chem. · 2002 · 6 · 54310.1002/1439-7641(20020617)3:6<543::AID-CPHC543>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
24. Fischer R. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 153 · 3510.1016/0304-8853(95)00494-7 ↗
25. Yan L. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2009 · 91 · 1710.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02825.x ↗
26. Herzer G. · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1990 · 26 · 139710.1109/20.104389 ↗
27. Grössinger R. · Physica B · 1998 · 246 · 21310.1016/S0921-4526(98)00011-8 ↗
28. Kronmüller H. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 29 · 227410.1088/0022-3727/29/9/008 ↗
29. White R. L. · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1997 · 33 · 99010.1109/20.560144 ↗
30. Berkowitz A. E. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1959 · S13410.1063/1.2185853 ↗
31. Wang Z. · Phys. Status Solidi (RRL) · 2012 · 2 · 9210.1002/pssr.201105498 ↗