Single-Molecule Bonds Characterized by Solid-State Nanopore Force Spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Weak molecular interactions drive processes at the core of living systems, such as enzyme-substrate interactions, receptor-ligand binding, and nucleic acid replication. Single-molecule force spectroscopy is a remarkable tool for revealing molecular scale energy landscapes of noncovalent bonds, by exerting a mechanical force directly on an individual molecular complex and tracking its survival as a function of time and applied force. In principle, force spectroscopy methods can also be used for highly specific molecular recognition assays, by directly characterizing the strength of bonds between probe and target molecules. However, complexity and low throughput of conventional force spectroscopy techniques render such biosensing applications impractical. Here we demonstrate a straightforward single-molecule approach, suitable for both biophysical studies and molecular recognition assays, in which a approximately 3 nm silicon nitride nanopore is used to determine the bond lifetime spectrum of the biotin-neutravidin complex. Thousands of individual molecular complexes are captured and dissociated in the solid-state nanopore under constant applied forces, ranging from 400 to 900 mV, allowing us to extract the location of the energy barrier that governs the interaction, mapped at Deltax approximately 0.5 nm. These results highlight the capacity of a solid-state nanopore to detect and characterize intermolecular interactions and demonstrate how this could be applied to rapid, highly specific molecular detection assays.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Mechanical and Optical Resonators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of British Columbia, B.C., Canada
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Evans E. · Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. · 2001 · 30 · 10510.1146/annurev.biophys.30.1.105 ↗
2. Dudko O. K. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2008 · 105 · 1575510.1073/pnas.0806085105 ↗
3. Neuman K. C. · Nat. Methods · 2008 · 5 · 49110.1038/nmeth.1218 ↗
4. Nakane J. · Biophys. J. · 2004 · 87 · 61510.1529/biophysj.104.040212 ↗
5. Tropini C. · Biophys. J. · 2007 · 92 · 163210.1529/biophysj.106.094060 ↗
6. Mathe J. · Biophys. J. · 2004 · 87 · 320510.1529/biophysj.104.047274 ↗
7. Hornblower B. · Nat. Methods · 2007 · 4 · 31510.1038/nmeth1021 ↗
8. Pincet F. · Biophys. J. · 2005 · 89 · 437410.1529/biophysj.105.067769 ↗
9. Green, N. M.; Anfinsen, C. B.; Frederic, J. J. T. E.; Avidin, M. R.Advances in Protein Chemistry;Academic Press:New York, 1975; Vol. 29, pp85−133.10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60411-8 ↗
10. Lee G. U. · Langmuir · 1994 · 10 · 35410.1021/la00014a003 ↗
11. Merkel R. · Nature · 1999 · 397 · 5010.1038/16219 ↗
12. Grubmüller H. · Science · 1996 · 271 · 99710.1126/science.271.5251.997 ↗
13. Walton E. B. · Biophys. J. · 2008 · 94 · 262110.1529/biophysj.107.114454 ↗
14. Vermette P. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2003 · 259 · 1310.1016/S0021-9797(02)00185-6 ↗
15. Biancaniello P. L. · Biophys. J. · 2008 · 94 · 89110.1529/biophysj.107.108449 ↗
16. Wiggin M. · Biophys. J. · 2008 · 95 · 531710.1529/biophysj.108.137760 ↗
17. Berberan-Santos M. N. · Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 315 · 17110.1016/j.chemphys.2005.04.006 ↗
18. Yang H. · Science · 2003 · 302 · 26210.1126/science.1086911 ↗
19. Bell G. · Science · 1978 · 200 · 61810.1126/science.347575 ↗
20. Evans E. · Biophys. J. · 1997 · 72 · 154110.1016/S0006-3495(97)78802-7 ↗
21. Keyser U. F. · Nat. Phys. · 2006 · 2 · 47310.1038/nphys344 ↗
22. Hiller Y. · Biochem. J. · 1987 · 248 · 16710.1042/bj2480167 ↗
23. Wu M.-Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 113106-3
24. Tabard-Cossa V. · Nanotechnology · 2007 · 18 · 30550510.1088/0957-4484/18/30/305505 ↗
25. Hanggi P. · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1990 · 62 · 25110.1103/RevModPhys.62.251 ↗
26. In other FS methods, the bonds are often formed when two functionalized surfaces are brought into contact for very short times (milliseconds to seconds), thus potentially not allowing the system enough time to reach its most stable state and introducing effects from the history of its formation.(8).