Chemical Vapor Deposition of Graphene on a “Peeled-Off” Epitaxial Cu(111) Foil: A Simple Approach to Improved Properties
Source abstract
Abstract
We present a simple approach to improving the quality of CVD grown graphene, exploiting a Cu(111) foil catalyst. The catalyst is epitaxially grown by evaporation on a single crystal sapphire substrate, thickened by electroplating, and peeled off. The exposed surface is atomically flat, easily reduced, and exclusively of (111) orientation. Graphene grown on this catalyst under atmospheric CVD conditions and without wet chemical prereduction produces single crystal domain sizes of several hundred micrometers in samples that are many centimeters in size. The graphene produced in this way can easily be transferred to other substrates using well-established techniques. We report mobilities extracted using field-effect (as high as 29 000 cm(2) V(-1) s(-1)) and Hall bar measurement (up to 10 100 cm(2) V(-1) s(-1)).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Physical Chemistry, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Division of Advanced Materials Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), 790-784 Pohang, Korea
IV. Physical Institute, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Li X. S. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 131210.1126/science.1171245 ↗
2. Bae S. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 57410.1038/nnano.2010.132 ↗
3. Novoselov K. S. · Nature · 2012 · 490 · 19210.1038/nature11458 ↗
4. Kim K. S. · Nature · 2009 · 457 · 70610.1038/nature07719 ↗
5. Geim A. K. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 153010.1126/science.1158877 ↗
6. Wood J. D. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 454710.1021/nl201566c ↗
7. Hu B. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 5710.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.002 ↗
8. Gao L. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 351210.1021/nl1016706 ↗
9. Han G. H. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 414410.1021/nl201980p ↗
10. Song H. S. · Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 2 · 33710.1038/srep00337 ↗
11. Ni G.-X. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 115810.1021/nn203775x ↗
12. Reddy K. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 11311710.1063/1.3569143 ↗
13. Orofeo C. M. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 218910.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.030 ↗
14. Miller D. L. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 06431710.1063/1.4754013 ↗
15. Khattak C. P. · 2003 · 5078 · 4710.1117/12.487633 ↗
16. Khattak C. P. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2001 · 225 · 57210.1016/S0022-0248(01)00955-1 ↗
17. Schmid F. · Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. · 1994 · 73 · 39
18. Oh S. H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 14191210.1063/1.2794025 ↗
19. Yu H. K. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 882810.1021/nn202985q ↗
20. Yu H. K. · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2011 · 11 · 243810.1021/cg200203s ↗
21. Chavez K. L. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2001 · 148 · G64010.1149/1.1409400 ↗
22. Biesinger M. C. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 257 · 88710.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.086 ↗
23. Levendorf M. P. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 447910.1021/nl902790r ↗
24. Zhang B. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 247110.1021/nn204827h ↗
25. Luo Z. · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 144110.1021/cm1028854 ↗
26. Kim D. W. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 2910.1038/nnano.2011.198 ↗
27. Hao Y. F. · Science · 2013 · 342 · 72010.1126/science.1243879 ↗
28. Malard L. M. · Phys. Rep. · 2009 · 473 · 5110.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003 ↗
29. Chen F. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 990810.1021/ja9041862 ↗
30. Kim S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 06210710.1063/1.3077021 ↗
31. Bolotin K. I. · Solid State Commun. · 2008 · 146 · 35110.1016/j.ssc.2008.02.024 ↗
32. Chen J.-H. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 20610.1038/nnano.2008.58 ↗