journal article·2014-05-27

Improved Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy Using Micromachined Cantilevers

Matthew S. Bull, Ruby May A. Sullan, Hongbin Li, Thomas T. Perkins

ACS Nano· Volume 8· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Enhancing the short-term force precision of atomic force microscopy (AFM) while maintaining excellent long-term force stability would result in improved performance across multiple AFM modalities, including single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS). SMFS is a powerful method to probe the nanometer-scale dynamics and energetics of biomolecules (DNA, RNA, and proteins). The folding and unfolding rates of such macromolecules are sensitive to sub-pN changes in force. Recently, we demonstrated sub-pN stability over a broad bandwidth (Δf = 0.01-16 Hz) by removing the gold coating from a 100 μm long cantilever. However, this stability came at the cost of increased short-term force noise, decreased temporal response, and poor sensitivity. Here, we avoided these compromises while retaining excellent force stability by modifying a short (L = 40 μm) cantilever with a focused ion beam. Our process led to a ∼10-fold reduction in both a cantilever's stiffness and its hydrodynamic drag near a surface. We also preserved the benefits of a highly reflective cantilever while mitigating gold-coating induced long-term drift. As a result, we extended AFM's sub-pN bandwidth by a factor of ∼50 to span five decades of bandwidth (Δf ≈ 0.01-1000 Hz). Measurements of mechanically stretching individual proteins showed improved force precision coupled with state-of-the-art force stability and no significant loss in temporal resolution compared to the stiffer, unmodified cantilever. Finally, these cantilevers were robust and were reused for SFMS over multiple days. Hence, we expect these responsive, yet stable, cantilevers to broadly benefit diverse AFM-based studies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

JILA, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States

Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States

Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1, Canada

Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States

Funding

National Institute of Standards and Technology · National Science Foundation

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Binnig G. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1986 · 56 · 93010.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930 ↗
2. Engel A. · Annu. Rev. Biochem. · 2008 · 77 · 12710.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.154450 ↗
3. Rief M. · Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. · 2000 · 481 · 12910.1007/978-1-4615-4267-4_8 ↗
4. Muller D. J. · Nat. Chem. Biol. · 2009 · 5 · 38310.1038/nchembio.181 ↗
5. Muller D. J. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 26110.1038/nnano.2008.100 ↗
6. Muller D. J. · Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. · 2006 · 16 · 48910.1016/j.sbi.2006.06.001 ↗
7. Scheuring S. · Science · 2005 · 309 · 48410.1126/science.1110879 ↗
8. Ando T. · Nanotechnology · 2012 · 23 · 06200110.1088/0957-4484/23/6/062001 ↗
9. Fernandez J. M. · Science · 2004 · 303 · 167410.1126/science.1092497 ↗
10. Rief M. · Science · 1997 · 276 · 110910.1126/science.276.5315.1109 ↗
11. Muller D. J. · Biophys. J. · 1995 · 68 · 168110.1016/S0006-3495(95)80345-0 ↗
12. Schabert F. A. · Science · 1995 · 268 · 9210.1126/science.7701347 ↗
13. Muller D. J. · Biophys. J. · 1999 · 76 · 110110.1016/S0006-3495(99)77275-9 ↗
14. Muller D. J. · J. Struct. Biol. · 1997 · 119 · 14910.1006/jsbi.1997.3878 ↗
15. Junker J. P. · Science · 2009 · 323 · 63310.1126/science.1166191 ↗
16. Rief M. · Nat. Struct. Biol. · 1999 · 6 · 34610.1038/7582 ↗
17. Rief M. · Science · 1997 · 275 · 129510.1126/science.275.5304.1295 ↗
18. Muller D. J. · Trends Cell Biol. · 2011 · 21 · 46110.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.008 ↗
19. Dufrene Y. F. · Nat. Methods · 2011 · 8 · 12310.1038/nmeth0211-123 ↗
20. Casuso I. · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 03510410.1088/0957-4484/21/3/035104 ↗
21. Sullan R. M. · Methods · 2013 · 60 · 13110.1016/j.ymeth.2013.03.029 ↗
22. Liphardt J. · Science · 2001 · 292 · 73310.1126/science.1058498 ↗
23. Viani M. B. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 86 · 225810.1063/1.371039 ↗
24. Churnside A. B. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 355710.1021/nl301166w ↗
25. King G. M. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 145110.1021/nl803298q ↗
26. Zocher M. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 96110.1021/nn204624p ↗
27. Sapra K. T. · J. Mol. Biol. · 2006 · 355 · 64010.1016/j.jmb.2005.10.080 ↗
28. Maali A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 02490610.1063/1.2163996 ↗
29. Hodges A. R. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2001 · 72 · 388010.1063/1.1405799 ↗
30. Noy A. · Chem. Biol. · 1997 · 4 · 51910.1016/S1074-5521(97)90324-0 ↗
31. Denis F. A. · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 81910.1021/la011011o ↗
32. Piner R. D. · Science · 1999 · 283 · 66110.1126/science.283.5402.661 ↗
33. Liu M. Z. · Nano Lett. · 2002 · 2 · 86310.1021/nl025626x ↗
34. Labuda A. · Nanotechnology · 2012 · 23 · 02550310.1088/0957-4484/23/2/025503 ↗
35. Svoboda K. · Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. · 1994 · 23 · 24710.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.001335 ↗
36. Kawakami M. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 100210.1021/la902472h ↗
37. Yu H. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2012 · 109 · 528310.1073/pnas.1107736109 ↗
38. Stigler J. · Science · 2011 · 334 · 51210.1126/science.1207598 ↗
39. Sullivan D. B. · 1990
40. Czerwinski F. · Opt. Express · 2009 · 17 · 1325510.1364/OE.17.013255 ↗
41. Howard J. · 2001
42. Nauli S. · Nat. Struct. Biol. · 2001 · 8 · 60210.1038/89638 ↗
43. Janovjak H. · Eur. Biophys. J. · 2005 · 34 · 9110.1007/s00249-004-0430-3 ↗
44. Liu R. C. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2010 · 81 · 06370310.1063/1.3436646 ↗
45. Rico F. · Science · 2013 · 342 · 74110.1126/science.1239764 ↗
46. Dufrene Y. F. · Nat. Methods · 2013 · 10 · 84710.1038/nmeth.2602 ↗
47. Alsteens D. · Langmuir · 2012 · 28 · 1673810.1021/la303891j ↗
48. Medalsy I. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2011 · 50 · 1210310.1002/anie.201103991 ↗
49. Rico F. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 398310.1021/nl202351t ↗
50. Cecconi C. · Science · 2005 · 309 · 205710.1126/science.1116702 ↗
51. Stokes D. J. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · 87410.1088/0022-3727/40/3/028 ↗
52. van Dorp W. F. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 08130110.1063/1.2977587 ↗
53. Giannuzzi L. A. · 200510.1007/b101190 ↗
54. Hopman W. C. L. · Nanotechnology · 2007 · 18 · 19530510.1088/0957-4484/18/19/195305 ↗
55. Proksch R. · Nanotechnology · 2004 · 15 · 134410.1088/0957-4484/15/9/039 ↗
56. Cao Y. · Biophys. J. · 2008 · 95 · 78210.1529/biophysj.107.128298 ↗
57. Zimmermann J. L. · Nat. Protoc. · 2010 · 5 · 97510.1038/nprot.2010.49 ↗
58. Ha T. · Nature · 2002 · 419 · 63810.1038/nature01083 ↗
59. Cao Y. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 104 · 1567710.1073/pnas.0705367104 ↗