Stretch-Induced Stiffness Enhancement of Graphene Grown by Chemical Vapor Deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical properties of ultrathin membranes have attracted considerable attention recently. Nanoindentation based on atomic force microscopy is commonly employed to study mechanical properties. We find that the data processing procedures in previous studies are nice approximations, but it is difficult for them to illustrate the mechanical properties precisely. Accordingly, we develop a revised numerical method to describe the force curve properly, by which the intrinsic mechanical properties of these membranes can be acquired. Combining the nanoindentation measurements with the revised numerical method, we demonstrate that loading-unloading cycles under large load can lead to a pronounced improvement in stiffness of graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). The Young's moduli of the stretched CVD graphene membranes can be improved to ∼1 TPa, closing to the value of the pristine graphene. Our findings demonstrate a possible way to recover the exceptional elastic properties of CVD graphene from the softened stiffness caused by wrinkles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory for Mesoscopic Physics, Department of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China
Department of Physics, Northwest University, Xi’an 710069, People’s Republic of China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Novoselov K. S. · Science · 2004 · 306 · 66610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
2. Novoselov K. S. · Nature · 2005 · 438 · 19710.1038/nature04233 ↗
3. Zhang H. J. · Nat. Phys. · 2009 · 5 · 43810.1038/nphys1270 ↗
4. Mak K. F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105
5. Novoselov K. S. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2005 · 102 · 1045110.1073/pnas.0502848102 ↗
6. Li X. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 131210.1126/science.1171245 ↗
7. Zhang Y. · Nat. Phys. · 2010 · 6 · 58410.1038/nphys1689 ↗
8. Lee C. · Science · 2008 · 321 · 38510.1126/science.1157996 ↗
9. Ruiz-Vargas C. S. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 225910.1021/nl200429f ↗
10. Suk J. W. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 655710.1021/nn101781v ↗
11. Rafiee M. A. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 388410.1021/nn9010472 ↗
12. Bertolazzi S. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 970310.1021/nn203879f ↗
13. Salvetat J. P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 94410.1103/PhysRevLett.82.944 ↗
14. Salvetat J. P. · Adv. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 16110.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199902)11:2<161::AID-ADMA161>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
15. San Paulo A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87
16. Wu B. · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 52510.1038/nmat1403 ↗
17. Ni H. · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 359110.1088/0957-4484/17/14/039 ↗
18. Liang J. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 162810.1021/nn900294n ↗
19. Tombler T. W. · Nature · 2000 · 405 · 76910.1038/35015519 ↗
20. Petrone N. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 275110.1021/nl204481s ↗
21. Li X. S. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 435910.1021/nl902623y ↗
22. Ferrari A. C. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97
23. Butt H.-J. · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 2005 · 59 · 110.1016/j.surfrep.2005.08.003 ↗
24. Cappella B. · IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. · 1997 · 16 · 5810.1109/51.582177 ↗
25. Wei Y. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 75910.1038/nmat3370 ↗
26. van der Zande A. M. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 486910.1021/nl102713c ↗
27. Song L. · Nanotechnology · 2012 · 23 · 08530110.1088/0957-4484/23/8/085301 ↗
28. Sader J. E. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1999 · 70 · 396710.1063/1.1150021 ↗