journal article·2005-10

Alternative etching gases to SF6 for plasma enhanced chamber cleaning in silicon deposition systems

T. Rößler, M. Albert, R. Terasa, J.W. Bartha

Surface and Coatings Technology· Volume 200· Issue 1-4
Publisher page

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reduce the amount of harmful substances in the effluent gas in the plasma cleaning process of vacuum chambers by substituting the greenhouse gas SF 6 . We present comparative studies for the optimised cleaning rates which are based on C 4 F 8 / O 2 and NF 3 diluted with He, Ar and N 2 in comparison to SF 6 /O 2 . Since the deposition of amorphous silicon (a-Si) requires a temperature of 200-250 °C in the vacuum chamber, the cleaning process has to match with these conditions, creating especially limitations on the maximum plasma power that can be used. The results for C4F 8 /O 2 turn out to be unsatisfactory. NF 3 however appears to be more promising. We find that the utilisation of NF 3 as etching gas in the vacuum chamber approaches up to 90% and the dilution can be up to 80%. This high dilution and utilisation demonstrates also that cleaning with NF 3 can be cheaper than cleaning with SF 6 even though NF 3 is much more expensive than SF 6 .
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasma Diagnostics and Applications · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Global Warming Potentials of ODS Substitutes, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002
2. Air Liquide u.a. (Hrsg.) (2001): EG-Sicherheitsdatenblatt Fluor; 23.5.2001
3. Siegele · Future Fab Int. · 2002 · 13. · 107
4. Uchida · Thin Solid Films · 2001 · 395 · 7510.1016/S0040-6090(01)01211-1 ↗
5. Masuda · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2002 · 74 · 37310.1016/S0927-0248(02)00130-7 ↗
6. Masuda · Vacuum · 2002 · 66 · 29310.1016/S0042-207X(02)00133-1 ↗
7. Pruette · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A, Vac. Surf. Films · 1998 · 16 · 157710.1116/1.581190 ↗
8. Saito · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 1991 · 9 · 250310.1116/1.585682 ↗
9. Taylor · Semicond. Int. · 1999 · 22 · 201
10. Misra · Mater. Lett. · 1998 · 34 · 41510.1016/S0167-577X(97)00209-7 ↗
11. Bruno · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A, Vac. Surf. Films · 1994 · 12 · 69010.1116/1.578854 ↗
12. Remote NF3 chember clean virtually eliminates PFC emissions from CVD chambers and improves system productivity
13. Raoux · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 1999 · 17 · 47710.1116/1.590580 ↗
14. Perrin · Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. · 1990 · 10 · 57110.1007/BF01447265 ↗
15. Evaluation of c-C4F8 versus Other Chamber Cleaning Processes in an Applied Materials P-5000 Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) Tool, SEMATECH DOC ID #: 01024083ATR.
16. New end-user studies of c-C4F8, an optimum flurocarbon gas for CVD chamber cleaning, C.C. Allgood, “A Partnership for PFC emission reduction”, Semicon Southwest, 2000.