A New Lower Limit for the Ultimate Breaking Strain of Carbon Nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
We apply immense strain to ultralong, suspended, single-walled carbon nanotubes while monitoring their Raman spectra. We can achieve strains up to 13.7 ± 0.3% without slippage, breakage, or defect formation based on the observation of reversible change in Raman spectra. This is more than twice that of previous observations. The rate of G band downshift with strain is found to span a wide range from -6.2 to -23.6 cm(-1)/% strain. Under these immense strains, the G band is observed to downshift by up to 157 cm(-1) (from 1592 to 1435 cm(-1)). Interestingly, under these significant lattice distortions, we observe no detectable D band Raman intensity. Also, we do not observe any broadening of the G band line width until a threshold downshift of Δω(G) > 75 cm(-1) is achieved at high strains, beyond which the fwhm of the G band increases sharply and reversibly. On the basis of a theoretical nonlinear stress-strain response, we estimate the maximum applied stress of the nanotubes in this study to be 99 GPa with a strength-to-weight ratio of almost 74,000 kN x m/kg, which is 30 times that of Kevlar and 117 times that of steel.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics
Department of Materials Science
Department of Electrical Engineering
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Gupta S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 16542810.1103/PhysRevB.72.165428 ↗
2. Wu Y. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 415810.1021/nl801563q ↗
3. Kumar R. · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 8 · 12210.1166/jnn.2008.N12 ↗
4. Sazonova V. · Nature · 2004 · 431 · 28410.1038/nature02905 ↗
5. Chiu H. Y. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 434210.1021/nl802181c ↗
6. Lucas M. · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 8540510.1103/PhysRevB.69.085405 ↗
7. Zhao Q. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 62 · 14710.1016/S0266-3538(01)00187-7 ↗
8. Yakobson B. I. · Am. Sci. · 1997 · 85 · 324
9. Pugno N. M. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2006 · 18 · S1971
10. Nardelli M. B. · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · R427710.1103/PhysRevB.57.R4277 ↗
11. Yu M. F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 555210.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5552 ↗
12. Walters D. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 74 · 380310.1063/1.124185 ↗
13. Zhao Q. Z. · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 14410510.1103/PhysRevB.65.144105 ↗
14. Lucas M. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2004 · 64 · 229710.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.021 ↗
15. Zhao Q. · Composites, Part A · 2003 · 34 · 121910.1016/j.compositesa.2003.07.005 ↗
16. Zhao Q. · Philos. Trans. R Soc. London, Ser. A · 2004 · 362 · 240710.1098/rsta.2004.1447 ↗
17. Hadjiev V. G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 319310.1063/1.1373405 ↗
18. Cooper C. A. · Composites, Part A · 2001 · 32 · 40110.1016/S1359-835X(00)00107-X ↗
19. Schadler L. S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 384210.1063/1.122911 ↗
20. Cronin S. B. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 16740110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.167401 ↗
21. Cronin S. B. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 3542510.1103/PhysRevB.72.035425 ↗
22. Kumar R. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 15542110.1103/PhysRevB.75.155421 ↗
23. Kumar R. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 16542810.1103/PhysRevB.78.165428 ↗
24. Brintlinger, T. H.Carbon Nanotube Electronics: Growth, Imaging and Electronic Properties. Ph.D Thesis, University of Maryland, 2005.
25. Sfeir M. Y. · Science · 2004 · 306 · 154010.1126/science.1103294 ↗
26. Son H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 25311310.1063/1.2749870 ↗
27. Huang M. Y. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 13680310.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136803 ↗
28. Dresselhaus M. S. · Carbon · 2002 · 40 · 204310.1016/S0008-6223(02)00066-0 ↗
29. Dresselhaus M. S. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2002 · 35 · 107010.1021/ar0101537 ↗
30. Yang W. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 19544010.1103/PhysRevB.77.195440 ↗
31. Wu G. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 11541110.1103/PhysRevB.72.115411 ↗
32. Gao B. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 2012310.1021/jp809374j ↗
33. Souza Filho A. G. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 21740310.1103/PhysRevLett.95.217403 ↗
34. Yang L. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 15410.1103/PhysRevLett.85.154 ↗
35. Tombler T. W. · Nature · 2000 · 405 · 76910.1038/35015519 ↗
36. Minot E. D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 15640110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.156401 ↗
37. Maiti A. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 12680510.1103/PhysRevLett.88.126805 ↗
38. Cao J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 15760110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.157601 ↗
39. Randal J. G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 09310410.1063/1.1872221 ↗
40. Maki H. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 89010.1021/nl062680v ↗
41. Lee C. · Science · 2008 · 321 · 38510.1126/science.1157996 ↗
42. Liu F. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 06412010.1103/PhysRevB.76.064120 ↗
43. Hsu I. K. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 59010.1021/nl802737q ↗