Investigating the Diameter-Dependent Stability of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
We investigate the long-standing question of whether electrons accelerated at 80 kV are below the knock-on damage threshold for single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs). Aberration-corrected high-resolution transmission electron microscopy is used to directly image the atomic structure of the SWNTs and provides in situ monitoring of the structural modification induced by electron beam irradiation at 80 kV. We find that SWNTs with small diameters of 1 nm are damaged by the electron beam, and defects are produced in the side walls that can lead to their destruction. SWNTs with diameters of 1.3 nm and larger are more stable against degradation, and stability increases with diameter. The effect of diameter, defects, and exterior contamination on the inherent stability of SWNTs under electron beam irradiation is investigated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, United Kingdom
IFW Dresden, P.O. Box 270116, D-01171 Dresden, Germany
Department of Engineering, The University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FA, United Kingdom
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Hashimoto A. · Nature · 2004 · 430 · 87010.1038/nature02817 ↗
2. Suenaga K. · Nature · 2007 · 2 · 358
3. Egerton R. F. · Micron · 2004 · 35 · 39910.1016/j.micron.2004.02.003 ↗
4. Krasheninnikov A. V. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 72310.1038/nmat1996 ↗
5. Warner J. H. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 10210.1021/nl8025949 ↗
6. Sato Y. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 315110.1021/nl801364g ↗
7. Guan L. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 45910.1021/nl072396j ↗
8. Sato Y. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 370410.1021/nl0720152 ↗
9. Warner J. H. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 232810.1021/nl801149z ↗
10. Crespi V. H. · Phys. Rev. B. · 1996 · 54 · 592710.1103/PhysRevB.54.5927 ↗
11. Smith B. W. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 350910.1063/1.1383020 ↗
12. Zobelli A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 24540210.1103/PhysRevB.75.245402 ↗
13. Yasuda M. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 20540610.1103/PhysRevB.75.205406 ↗
14. Lu A. J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 10550410.1103/PhysRevLett.92.105504 ↗
15. Krasheninnikov A. V. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 12542810.1103/PhysRevB.72.125428 ↗
16. Ajayan P. M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 143710.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1437 ↗
17. Banhart F. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 241408(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.71.241408 ↗
18. Zhong G. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 190710.1021/jp067776s ↗
19. Yuzvinsky T. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 05310910.1063/1.1857081 ↗
20. Niyogi S. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2002 · 35 · 110510.1021/ar010155r ↗
21. Melchor S. · J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. · 2004 · 44 · 163910.1021/ci049857w ↗