Discovery of Wall-Selective Carbon Nanotube Growth Conditions via Automated Experimentation
Source abstract
Abstract
Applications of carbon nanotubes continue to advance, with substantial progress in nanotube electronics, conductive wires, and transparent conductors to name a few. However, wider application remains impeded by a lack of control over production of nanotubes with the desired purity, perfection, chirality, and number of walls. This is partly due to the fact that growth experiments are time-consuming, taking about 1 day per run, thus making it challenging to adequately explore the many parameters involved in growth. We endeavored to speed up the research process by automating CVD growth experimentation. The adaptive rapid experimentation and in situ spectroscopy CVD system described in this contribution conducts over 100 experiments in a single day, with automated control and in situ Raman characterization. Linear regression modeling was used to map regions of selectivity toward single-wall and multiwall carbon nanotube growth in the complex parameter space of the water-assisted CVD synthesis. This development of the automated rapid serial experimentation is a significant progress toward an autonomous closed-loop learning system: a Robot Scientist.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Air Force Research Laboratory, Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, RXAS, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, United States
UES Inc., Dayton, Ohio 45432, United States
Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Radushkevich L. V. · Zh. Fiz. Khim. · 1952 · 26 · 88
2. Koyama T. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1972 · 11 · 44510.1143/JJAP.11.445 ↗
3. Baker R. T. K. · J. Catal. · 1972 · 26 · 5110.1016/0021-9517(72)90032-2 ↗
4. Oberlin A. · J. Cryst. Growth · 1976 · 32 · 33510.1016/0022-0248(76)90115-9 ↗
5. Iijima S. · Nature · 1993 · 363 · 60310.1038/363603a0 ↗
6. Bethune D. S. · Nature · 1993 · 363 · 60510.1038/363605a0 ↗
7. Dai H. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 260 · 47110.1016/0009-2614(96)00862-7 ↗
8. Hafner J. H. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 296 · 19510.1016/S0009-2614(98)01024-0 ↗
9. Cheng H. M. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 289 · 60210.1016/S0009-2614(98)00479-5 ↗
10. Satishkumar B. C. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 293 · 4710.1016/S0009-2614(98)00727-1 ↗
11. Nikolaev P. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 313 · 9110.1016/S0009-2614(99)01029-5 ↗
12. Hata K. · Science · 2004 · 306 · 136210.1126/science.1104962 ↗
13. Yasuda S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 143115-110.1063/1.2987480 ↗
14. Chakrabarti S. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 45 · L72010.1143/JJAP.45.L720 ↗
15. Ci L. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 907710.1021/jp072123c ↗
16. Yamada T. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2006 · 1 · 13110.1038/nnano.2006.95 ↗
17. Zhu L. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 264110.1021/nl051906b ↗
18. Patole S. P. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 41 · 155311-110.1088/0022-3727/41/15/155311 ↗
19. Zhao B. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 10810.1021/nn800648a ↗
20. Noda S. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 46 · L39910.1143/JJAP.46.L399 ↗
21. Puretzky A. A. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2005 · 81 · 22310.1007/s00339-005-3256-7 ↗
22. Wood R. F. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 235446-1
23. Wirth C. T. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 356010.1021/nn900613e ↗
24. Rao R. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 21310.1038/nmat3231 ↗
25. Rao R. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 110010.1021/nn304064u ↗
26. Moisala A. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2003 · 15 · S3011
27. Chan E. M. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 187410.1021/nl100669s ↗
28. King R. D. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 8510.1126/science.1165620 ↗
29. Sparkes A. · Autom. Exp. · 2010 · 2 · 1-110.1186/1759-4499-2-1 ↗
30. Bilsland E. · Open Biol. · 2013 · 3 · 120158-110.1098/rsob.120158 ↗
31. Cassell A. M. · Langmuir · 2001 · 17 · 26010.1021/la001273a ↗
32. Ng H. T. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 848410.1021/jp034198w ↗
33. Noda S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 173106-110.1063/1.1920417 ↗
34. Balkanski M. · Phys. Rev. B · 1983 · 28 · 192810.1103/PhysRevB.28.1928 ↗
35. Agresti A. · 2013
36. Amama P. B. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 4410.1021/nl801876h ↗
37. Kim S. M. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 91810.1021/jz9004762 ↗
38. Patole S. P. · Carbon · 2008 · 46 · 198710.1016/j.carbon.2008.08.009 ↗
39. Futaba D. N. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 056104-110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.056104 ↗
40. Cortes C. · Mach. Learn. · 1995 · 20 · 273
41. Breiman L. · Mach. Learn. · 2001 · 45 · 510.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
42. Powell W. B. · 201210.1002/9781118309858 ↗
43. Poleski J. · Nanotech. Conf. Expo 2013 · 2013 · 2 · 642
44. Massarrat S. · Gut · 1988 · 29 · 29110.1136/gut.29.3.291 ↗
45. Cinkotai F. F. · Br. J. Ind. Med. · 1988 · 45 · 782
46. Oliver C. R. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2013 · 84 · 115105-110.1063/1.4826275 ↗