Real versus Measured Surface Potentials in Scanning Kelvin Probe Microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Noncontact potentiometry or scanning Kelvin probe microscopy (SKPM) is a widely used technique to study charge injection and transport in (in)organic devices by measuring a laterally resolved local potential. This technique suffers from the significant drawback that experimentally obtained curves do not generally reflect the true potential profile in the device due to nonlocal coupling between the probing tip and the device. In this work, we quantitatively explain the experimental SKPM response and by doing so directly link theoretical device models to real observables. In particular, the model quantitatively explains the effects of the tip-sample distance and the dependence on the orientation of the probing tip with respect to the device.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Mechanical and Optical Resonators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands,
COBRA Research Institute, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Palermo S. · Adv. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 14510.1002/adma.200501394 ↗
2. Bürgi L. · Synth. Met. · 2004 · 146 · 29710.1016/j.synthmet.2004.08.009 ↗
3. Coffey D. C. · Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 73510.1038/nmat1712 ↗
4. Weng Z. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2004 · 22 · 94810.1116/1.1691080 ↗
5. Sacha G. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 261010.1063/1.1797539 ↗
6. Koley G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 54510.1063/1.1384004 ↗
7. Gil A. · Nanotechnology · 2003 · 14 · 33210.1088/0957-4484/14/2/345 ↗
8. Takahashi T. · Ultramicroscopy · 2004 · 100 · 28710.1016/j.ultramic.2004.01.017 ↗
9. Belaidi S. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 81 · 102310.1063/1.363884 ↗
10. Vatel O. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 77 · 235810.1063/1.358758 ↗
11. Shikler R. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2000 · 157 · 1104110.1016/S0169-4332(99)00536-X ↗
12. Hudlet S. · Eur. Phys. J. B · 1998 · 2 · 510.1007/s100510050219 ↗
13. Foster A. S. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 2001 · 72 · 5910.1007/s003390100628 ↗
14. Bonaccurso E. · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 085413/1–810.1103/PhysRevB.74.085413 ↗
15. Sacha G. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 123101/1–310.1063/1.1884764 ↗
16. Argento C. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 80 · 608110.1063/1.363680 ↗
17. Tevaarwerk E. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2005 · 76 · 053707/1–510.1063/1.1898183 ↗
18. Jacobs H. O. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 116810.1063/1.368181 ↗
19. Gross T. S. · Ultramicroscopy · 2001 · 87 · 14710.1016/S0304-3991(00)00093-0 ↗
20. Belaidi S. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. · 1998 · 66 · 23910.1007/s003390051138 ↗
21. Hochwitz T. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 1996 · 14 · 45710.1116/1.588494 ↗
22. Hudlet S. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 77 · 330810.1063/1.358616 ↗
23. Wu Y. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2006 · 77 · 043711/1–9
24. Nichols J. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 236610.1063/1.1611278 ↗
25. Müller K. · Synth. Met. · 2004 · 146 · 37710.1016/j.synthmet.2004.08.022 ↗
26. Lei C. H. · Nanotechnology · 2004 · 15 · 62710.1088/0957-4484/15/5/038 ↗
27. Zerweck U. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 125424/1–910.1103/PhysRevB.71.125424 ↗
28. Luo Y. · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 226710.1002/adma.200700913 ↗
29. Puntambekar K. P. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 553910.1063/1.1637443 ↗
30. Smits E. C. P. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 125202/1–6
31. Silveira W. R. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 116104/1–4
32. Bürgi L. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 291310.1063/1.1470702 ↗