journal article·2025-10-21Open access

Supramolecular Assembly of Lanthanide-Binding Tag Peptides for Aqueous Separation of Rare Earth Elements

Luis E. Ortuno Macias, Felipe Jiménez-Ángeles, Surabh S. KT, Kathleen J. Stebe, Monica Olvera de la Cruz, Mrinal K. Bera, Wei Bu, Binhua Lin, Charles Maldarelli, Raymond S. Tu

ACS Nano· Volume 19· Issue 41

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Selective and eco-friendly separation and purification methods for rare earth elements (REEs) are necessary to meet the increasing demand for these valuable metals, which are extensively used in modern electronics and clean energy technologies. Mining feedstocks consist of REE mixtures as stable trivalent cations (Ln 3+ ) that are difficult to separate due to their identical charge and similar size. Lanthanide-binding tags (LBTs), peptide chelates that coordinate Ln 3+ in binding pockets, show promise as selective, high-affinity extractants. We demonstrate that the LBT variant LBTLLA 5–, designed for high selectivity for Tb 3+, is an effective extractant, forming complexes with REEs in solution that subsequently organize into self-assembling structures rich in Ln 3+ . These structures condense into aggregates that can be separated, enabling an efficient, all-aqueous, eco-friendly separation process. The self-assembled structures are studied using dynamic light scattering, ζ-potential measurements, transmission electron microscopy, anomalous small-angle X-ray scattering, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy, and ultraviolet–visible absorption spectroscopy, which confirm LBTLLA 5– peptide-REE ion binding and the further assembly of micron-scale structures rich in REEs. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal the interactions promoting aggregation as well as the integrity of the binding pocket upon self-assembly. We find that LBTLLA 5–:Ln 3+ complexes recruit excess cations within the macrostructures, and we demonstrate that aggregation and selective separation can be controlled by manipulating the metal-peptide ratio in solution. Furthermore, we demonstrate separation from equimolar mixtures of REE pairs Tb 3+ -Lu 3+ and Tb 3+ -La 3+, supporting the application of LBT peptides as a platform for the selective separation of REEs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis · Extraction and Separation Processes · Radioactive element chemistry and processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering

The City College of New York

Levich Institute

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Northwestern University

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

University of Pennsylvania

NSF’s ChemMatCARS, Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering

University of Chicago

Funding

Division of Chemistry · Basic Energy Sciences · Argonne National Laboratory

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. Tiwari R. · 202110.1515/9783110676457 ↗
2. Jha A. · 201410.1201/b17045 ↗
3. Basu B. · 202310.1515/9783110788082 ↗
4. Atwood D. · 2013
5. Lucas J. · 2014
6. Schulz, K. Critical Mineral Resources of the United States: Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply; Professional paper; U.S. Geological Survey, 2017.10.3133/pp1802 ↗
7. Golloch A. · 202210.1515/9783110696455 ↗
8. Engineers N. · 2009
9. 10.1126/science.aau762810.1126/science.aau7628 ↗
10. Korkisch J. · 2013
11. Qi D. · 2018
12. Zhang J. · 201610.1007/978-3-319-28235-0 ↗
13. 10.1179/imr.1992.37.1.19710.1179/imr.1992.37.1.197 ↗
14. Voncken J. H. L. · 201610.1007/978-3-319-26809-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.07610.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.076 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.10467510.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104675 ↗
17. 10.1039/C5RA21027E10.1039/C5RA21027E ↗
18. 10.3389/fchem.2020.0051210.3389/fchem.2020.00512 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8GC00051D10.1039/C8GC00051D ↗
20. 10.1016/S1002-0721(13)60009-510.1016/S1002-0721(13)60009-5 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.gca.2009.03.01810.1016/j.gca.2009.03.018 ↗
22. 10.1007/s00253-012-4200-310.1007/s00253-012-4200-3 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.6b0836910.1021/acsami.6b08369 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b0006410.1021/acs.estlett.6b00064 ↗
25. 10.1039/C8GC01355A10.1039/C8GC01355A ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.7b0056510.1021/jacs.7b00565 ↗
27. 10.1039/C4TA02983F10.1039/C4TA02983F ↗
28. 10.1002/tcr.20180001210.1002/tcr.201800012 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0187710.1021/acs.est.1c01877 ↗
30. 10.1021/ja506730610.1021/ja5067306 ↗
31. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0477510.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04775 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00775010021410.1007/s007750100214 ↗
33. 10.1021/ja00441a06010.1021/ja00441a060 ↗
34. 10.1017/S003358350000275410.1017/S0033583500002754 ↗
35. 10.1021/bi00288a00410.1021/bi00288a004 ↗
36. 10.1021/bi00200a02610.1021/bi00200a026 ↗
37. 10.1002/cbic.20039004710.1002/cbic.200390047 ↗
38. 10.1002/cbic.20039004610.1002/cbic.200390046 ↗
39. 10.1002/anie.20046002810.1002/anie.200460028 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.est.5b0612910.1021/acs.est.5b06129 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.est.7b0241410.1021/acs.est.7b02414 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11672610.1016/j.seppur.2020.116726 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.10447810.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104478 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12764210.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127642 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.3c1756510.1021/acsami.3c17565 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsaenm.4c0051010.1021/acsaenm.4c00510 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsabm.3c0128010.1021/acsabm.3c01280 ↗
48. 10.1039/D2SM01664H10.1039/D2SM01664H ↗
49. 10.1073/pnas.050587110210.1073/pnas.0505871102 ↗
50. 10.1073/pnas.080029110510.1073/pnas.0800291105 ↗
51. 10.1039/C4OB00447G10.1039/C4OB00447G ↗
52. 10.1021/ja110966y10.1021/ja110966y ↗
53. 10.1021/la061238p10.1021/la061238p ↗
54. 10.1002/adfm.20050016110.1002/adfm.200500161 ↗
55. 10.1039/B304972H10.1039/B304972H ↗
56. 10.1073/pnas.19125019810.1073/pnas.191250198 ↗
57. 10.1073/pnas.241176312110.1073/pnas.2411763121 ↗
58. 10.1021/ja993783110.1021/ja9937831 ↗
59. 10.1002/adma.20180579810.1002/adma.201805798 ↗
60. 10.1021/jp911215610.1021/jp9112156 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.05.06210.1016/j.cplett.2013.05.062 ↗
62. 10.1021/ja406831n10.1021/ja406831n ↗
63. 10.1080/1350612070146113710.1080/13506120701461137 ↗
64. 10.1016/S0167-4838(01)00295-310.1016/S0167-4838(01)00295-3 ↗
65. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04717.x10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04717.x ↗
66. 10.1038/s41598-020-76527-y10.1038/s41598-020-76527-y ↗
67. 10.1007/s11947-019-02275-110.1007/s11947-019-02275-1 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2019.10456610.1016/j.idairyj.2019.104566 ↗
69. 10.1002/anie.20201380610.1002/anie.202013806 ↗
70. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0614010.1021/acsnano.3c06140 ↗
71. Bu, W.; Bera, M. XModFit: X-ray Modeling and Fitting. https://github.com/chemmatcars/XModFit.
72. 10.1093/nar/gkm23410.1093/nar/gkm234 ↗
73. 10.1063/5.001851610.1063/5.0018516 ↗
74. 10.1021/ct700301q10.1021/ct700301q ↗
75. 10.1021/ct300400x10.1021/ct300400x ↗
76. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b0101810.1021/acs.jctc.7b01018 ↗
77. 10.1063/1.47011710.1063/1.470117 ↗
78. 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90014-110.1016/0021-9991(83)90014-1 ↗
79. 10.1002/prot.2248810.1002/prot.22488 ↗
80. 10.1063/1.240842010.1063/1.2408420 ↗
81. 10.1063/1.32869310.1063/1.328693 ↗