journal article·2024-05-07

Time-Dependent and Coating Modulation of Tomato Response upon Sulfur Nanoparticle Internalization and Assimilation: An Orthogonal Mechanistic Investigation

Yi Wang, Chaoyi Deng, Lijuan Zhao, Christian O. Dimkpa, Wade H. Elmer, Bofei Wang, Sudhir Sharma, Zhenyu Wang, Om Parkash Dhankher, Baoshan Xing, Jason C. White

ACS Nano· Volume 18· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanoenabled strategies have recently attracted attention as a sustainable platform for agricultural applications. Here, we present a mechanistic understanding of nanobiointeraction through an orthogonal investigation. Pristine (nS) and stearic acid surface-modified (cS) sulfur nanoparticles (NPs) as a multifunctional nanofertilizer were applied to tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) through soil. Both nS and cS increased root mass by 73% and 81% and increased shoot weight by 35% and 50%, respectively, compared to the untreated controls. Bulk sulfur (bS) and ionic sulfate (iS) had no such stimulatory effect. Notably, surface modification of S NPs had a positive impact, as cS yielded 38% and 51% greater shoot weight compared to nS at 100 and 200 mg/L, respectively. Moreover, nS and cS significantly improved leaf photosynthesis by promoting the linear electron flow, quantum yield of photosystem II, and relative chlorophyll content. The time-dependent gene expression related to two S bioassimilation and signaling pathways showed a specific role of NP surface physicochemical properties. Additionally, a time-dependent Global Test and machine learning strategy applied to understand the NP surface modification domain metabolomic profiling showed that cS increased the contents of IA, tryptophan, tomatidine, and scopoletin in plant leaves compared to the other treatments. These findings provide critical mechanistic insights into the use of nanoscale sulfur as a multifunctional soil amendment to enhance plant performance as part of nanoenabled agriculture.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques · Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance · Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Analytical Chemistry, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 123 Huntington St., New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States

State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China

Department of Plant Pathology and Ecology, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, 123 Huntington St., New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States

Computational Sciences, The University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West Univ. Ave., El Paso, Texas 79968, United States

Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States

Institute of Environmental Processes and Pollution control, and School of Environment and Civil Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China

Funding

Division of Chemistry · National Institute of Food and Agriculture · Center for Sustainable Nanotechnology

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12571-018-0769-410.1007/s12571-018-0769-4 ↗
2. 10.1002/ppp3.1009810.1002/ppp3.10098 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.02.01610.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.02.016 ↗
4. 10.3389/fsoil.2023.112393110.3389/fsoil.2023.1123931 ↗
5. 10.1038/s43016-022-00596-710.1038/s43016-022-00596-7 ↗
6. 10.1038/s43016-020-0110-110.1038/s43016-020-0110-1 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41565-019-0470-610.1038/s41565-019-0470-6 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.230188512010.1073/pnas.2301885120 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0291710.1021/acsnano.1c02917 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0407310.1021/acsnano.2c04073 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0470510.1021/acs.est.6b04705 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14057210.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140572 ↗
13. 10.1038/nprot.2011.31910.1038/nprot.2011.319 ↗
14. 10.1093/nar/gkab38210.1093/nar/gkab382 ↗
15. 10.1039/C3TA13072J10.1039/C3TA13072J ↗
16. 10.3390/plants1001000210.3390/plants10010002 ↗
17. 10.1093/jxb/erh20610.1093/jxb/erh206 ↗
18. 10.1007/978-3-319-66682-2_1310.1007/978-3-319-66682-2_13 ↗
19. 10.3389/FPLS.2015.0021010.3389/FPLS.2015.00210 ↗
20. 10.3389/fpls.2014.0059710.3389/fpls.2014.00597 ↗
21. 10.1007/s00726-010-0478-610.1007/s00726-010-0478-6 ↗
22. Niu J. S. · Yi Chuan Xue Bao · 2002 · 29 · 266
23. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.00610.1016/j.phytochem.2004.04.006 ↗
24. 10.1074/jbc.M111.32486310.1074/jbc.M111.324863 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.06110.1016/j.watres.2015.11.061 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03889.x10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03889.x ↗
27. 10.1073/pnas.040327710110.1073/pnas.0403277101 ↗
28. 10.1111/nph.1554510.1111/nph.15545 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.04.01910.1016/j.phytochem.2006.04.019 ↗
30. 10.1111/ppl.1261910.1111/ppl.12619 ↗
31. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04355.x10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04355.x ↗
32. 10.3389/FPLS.2017.0047510.3389/FPLS.2017.00475 ↗
33. 10.3389/fpls.2015.0105310.3389/fpls.2015.01053 ↗
34. 10.1073/pnas.171764911510.1073/pnas.1717649115 ↗
35. 10.1073/pnas.70.2.59110.1073/pnas.70.2.591 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.02310.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.023 ↗
37. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01011.x10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01011.x ↗
38. 10.1093/jxb/ers09110.1093/jxb/ers091 ↗
39. 10.1093/AOB/MCI08310.1093/AOB/MCI083 ↗
40. 10.1111/pbi.1210510.1111/pbi.12105 ↗
41. 10.3390/molecules2611337410.3390/molecules26113374 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.02310.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.023 ↗
43. 10.1093/jxb/err43010.1093/jxb/err430 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.05.00410.1016/j.pbi.2008.05.004 ↗
45. 10.1016/B978-012543590-1/50010-X10.1016/B978-012543590-1/50010-X ↗
46. 10.3390/plants1106078710.3390/plants11060787 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jep.2013.10.03610.1016/j.jep.2013.10.036 ↗
48. 10.3390/nu1110228810.3390/nu11102288 ↗
49. 10.1105/TPC.15.0023110.1105/TPC.15.00231 ↗