INFLUENCE OF GLASS PROCESSING WASTE QUANTITIES ON THE FREEZE-THAW RESISTANCE OF SUSTAINABLE CONCRETE
Source abstract
Abstract
Two difficult to utilise wastes - glass sludge, obtained from processing glass, and concrete sludge, obtained by washing concrete trucks, were used. In the sustainable concrete composition, glass sludge was used as a replacement for cement, varying from 5% to 30% and concrete sludge was used as a filler. Additionally, sand, dolomite, a superplasticiser, a crystallising additive, and an air-entraining additive were used and a consistent water-to-binder ratio was maintained. The content of the entrained air, porosity parameters, compressive strength, water absorption, density and sorptivity index for the hardened samples were measured. The resistance to freezing was assessed by the volumetric method and scaling tests in a de-icing salt solution to determine the mass losses, while the damage degree of the internal structure was evaluated. The results suggest that the synergistic interaction between the glass sludge and the crystallising additives promotes pore healing, enhancing the closed porosity and reducing the open porosity at glass sludge levels of 20% or less. The findings indicate that glass sludge has no detrimental effects on the frost resistance qualities and may even enhance them if up to 20% of cement is substituted with glass sludge.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (88)
Show source-provided references
1. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12185710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121857 ↗
2. DOI: 10.3390/ma1413354910.3390/ma14133549 ↗
3. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.10810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.108 ↗
4. DOI: 10.3390/ma1505171310.3390/ma15051713 ↗
5. DOI: 10.3390/ma1517601810.3390/ma15176018 ↗
6. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12485010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124850 ↗
7. DOI: 10.3390/ma1402039810.3390/ma14020398 ↗
8. DOI: 10.3390/su13191071210.3390/su131910712 ↗
9. DOI: 10.3390/ma1402033210.3390/ma14020332 ↗
10. DOI: 10.3390/ma1415426410.3390/ma14154264 ↗
11. DOI: 10.14311/AP.2021.61.027910.14311/AP.2021.61.0279 ↗
12. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.09410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.094 ↗
13. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19191271710.3390/ijerph191912717 ↗
14. DOI: 10.1016/j.omx.2021.10010810.1016/j.omx.2021.100108 ↗
15. DOI: 10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00292-110.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00292-1 ↗
16. DOI: 10.3390/su1602076410.3390/su16020764 ↗
17. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0114910.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01149 ↗
18. DOI: 10.1016/j.dibe.2024.10037110.1016/j.dibe.2024.100371 ↗
19. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:2(89)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:2(89) ↗
20. DOI: 10.3390/ma1507252510.3390/ma15072525 ↗
21. DOI: 10.3390/ma1518622210.3390/ma15186222 ↗
22. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10574510.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105745 ↗
23. DOI: 10.1088/1757899X/1130/1/012010
24. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.11078
25. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000097910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000979 ↗
26. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.07210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.072 ↗
27. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.02210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.022 ↗
28. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.11710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.117 ↗
29. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.12.002 ↗
30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.02110.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.021 ↗
31. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.017 ↗
32. DOI: 10.56748/ejse.14195110.56748/ejse.141951 ↗
33. DOI: 10.22712/susb.20240004
34. DOI: 10.1016/j.clwas.2024.10019110.1016/j.clwas.2024.100191 ↗
35. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12399710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123997 ↗
36. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13531210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135312 ↗
37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12821310.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128213 ↗
38. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.01210.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.012 ↗
39. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.02610.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.026 ↗
40. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.02810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.028 ↗
41. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.006 ↗
42. DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2016.09.03510.1016/j.anucene.2016.09.035 ↗
43. DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00213-610.1016/S0008-8846(99)00213-6 ↗
44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12743510.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127435 ↗
45. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-018-4212-010.1007/s12517-018-4212-0 ↗
46. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.06810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.068 ↗
47. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.03310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.033 ↗
48. DOI: 10.1007/BF0247870610.1007/BF02478706 ↗
49. DOI: 10.13168/cs.2021.002810.13168/cs.2021.0028 ↗
50. DOI: 10.3390/ma1606253110.3390/ma16062531 ↗
51. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11684410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116844 ↗
52. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.23010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.230 ↗
53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.26010.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.260 ↗
54. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.11910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.119 ↗
55. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.01810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.018 ↗
56. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.11.01810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.11.018 ↗
57. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11780410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117804 ↗
58. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.09210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.092 ↗
59. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.02910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.029 ↗
60. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11957910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119579 ↗
61. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.10688810.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106888 ↗
62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.04.00910.1016/j.cemconres.2016.04.009 ↗
63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12478510.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124785 ↗
64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.02.05810.1016/j.ceramint.2023.02.058 ↗
65. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12497
66. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13048610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130486 ↗
67. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.03998-910.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.03998-9 ↗
68. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.02810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.028 ↗
69. DOI: 10.3390/buildings1312301510.3390/buildings13123015 ↗
70. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.07010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.070 ↗
71. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.08.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.08.005 ↗
72. DOI: 10.2174/187414950211501023610.2174/1874149502115010236 ↗
73. DOI: 10.13168/cs.2022.001610.13168/cs.2022.0016 ↗
74. DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.B1258.0982S111910.35940/ijrte.B1258.0982S1119 ↗
75. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11990310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119903 ↗
76. Taha, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 21, p. 709, (2009), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:12(709)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:12(709) ↗
77. LST, LST EN 12350-7:2019/AC:2022. Testing fresh concrete - Part 7, vol. 7, p. 1, (2022)
78. LST, LST EN 12390-7:2019. Testing hardened concrete - Part 7, vol. 7, p. 1, (2019)
79. LST, LST EN 12390-3:2019. Testing hardened concrete - Part 3, vol. 3, p. 1, (2019)
80. LST, LST 1428-17:2024. Concrete - Test methods - Part 17, vol. 17, p. 1, (2024)
81. CEN/TS, CEN/TS 12390-9:2016. Testing hardened concrete - Part 9, vol. 9, p. 1, (2016)
82. LST, LST EN 197-1:2011. Cement - Part 1, vol. 1, p. 1, (2011)
83. LST, LST EN 12620:2003Aggregates for concrete., vol. 1, p. 1, (2008)
84. LST, LST EN 934-2:2009Admixtures for concrete, mortar and grout - Part 2, vol. 2, p. 1, (2009)
85. LST, LST ISO 4316:1997. Surface active agents. Determination of pH of aqueous solutions. Potentiometric method, vol. 1, p. 1, (1997)
86. LST, LST EN 1008:2005. Mixing water for concrete, vol. 1, p. 1, (2005)
87. Lehne, Chatham house report making concrete change innovation in low-carbon cement and concrete, vol. 1, p. 1, (2018)
88. Watts, The Guardian, vol. 25, p. 1, (2019)10.4324/9780429329814-2 ↗