Quantifying the micro-architectural similarity of bioceramic scaffolds to bone
Source abstract
Abstract
Porous bioceramics for bone repair should ideally mimic the micro-architectural characteristics of bone and promote the growth of regenerated tissue inside their pores. Assessment of the similarity between scaffold and bone in a quantitative and reliable way still remains an open challenge that we tackled in this work. We produced glass-ceramic scaffolds with two different nominal porosities by polymer sponge replication and characterized their three-dimensional architecture through non-destructive X-ray micro-computed tomography. Six key independent features were measured, namely total porosity, pore interconnectivity, pore size distribution, specific surface area, connectivity density and degree of anisotropy. In order to enable quantitative and objective comparison between bioceramic scaffolds and bone, each of the above-mentioned independent characteristics measured in the scaffold was compared to the corresponding feature in human trabecular bone. A multiparametric score, which comprises all the estimated features, was also developed and used to evaluate the similarity between the produced scaffolds. These quantitative comparisons can allow researchers to identify reliably the scaffold that more closely resembles the bone micro-architecture, suggesting the possible use of this approach to guide the design, manufacturing and selection of biomimetic ceramic scaffolds.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice
2. Strategic directions in tissue engineering10.1089/ten.2007.0335 ↗
3. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
4. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering10.1038/nmat1421 ↗
5. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone regeneration10.2113/GSELEMENTS.3.6.393 ↗
6. Processing, characterisation and biocompatibility of iron-phosphate glass fibres for tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.013 ↗
7. Resorbable glass-ceramic phosphate-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: synthesis, properties and in vitro effects on human marrow stromal cells10.1177/0885328210372149 ↗
8. Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials10.1002/jbm.820050611 ↗
9. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.016 ↗
10. The story of bioglass®
11. Bioactive glasses: special applications outside the skeletal system10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.02.015 ↗
12. Bioactive ceramics10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb38500.x ↗
13. Three-dimensional glass-derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: current trends and forecasts for the future10.1002/jbm.a.33072 ↗
14. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022 ↗
15. 3-D high strength glass-ceramic scaffolds containing fluoroapatite for load-bearing bone portions replacement10.1016/j.msec.2009.04.002 ↗
16. Macroporous Bioglass®-derived scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.01.023 ↗
17. Preparation of porous 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds by using rice husk as a porogen additive10.1007/s10856-009-3690-8 ↗
18. Effect of surfactant concentration and composition on the structure and properties of sol-gel-derived bioactive glass scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1023/A:1025988301542 ↗
19. Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.017 ↗
20. Porous and strong bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds prepared by unidirectional freezing of camphene-based suspensions10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.034 ↗
21. Bone regeneration in strong porous bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds with an oriented microstructure implanted in rat calvarial defects10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.029 ↗
22. Bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with fibrous scaffolds composed of a mixture of silicate and borate bioactive glasses10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.039 ↗
23. Additive manufacturing of bioactive glasses and silicate bioceramics
24. Processing of 45S5 bioglass® by lithography-based additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.019 ↗
25. Fabrication of 13–93 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering using indirect selective laser sintering10.1088/1758-5082/3/2/025004 ↗
26. Bioinspired strong and highly porous glass scaffolds10.1002/adfm.201002030 ↗
27. Feasibility of three-dimensional macroporous scaffold using calcium phosphate glass and polyurethane sponge10.1007/s10853-006-6261-0 ↗
28. Bioactivity and mechanical stability of 45S5 bioactive glass scaffolds based on natural marine sponges10.1007/s10439-016-1595-5 ↗
29. Using porous bioceramic scaffolds to mimic healthy and osteoporotic bone10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.01.011 ↗
30. Bioactive glass-based materials with hierarchical porosity for medical applications: review of recent advances10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.033 ↗
31. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.mser.2014.04.001 ↗
32. Recent advances in X-ray microtomography applied to materials10.1179/174328008X277803 ↗
33. Microstructural characterization and in vitro bioactivity of porous glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration by synchrotron radiation X-ray microtomography10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.10.016 ↗
34. Quantifying the 3D macrostructure of tissue scaffolds
35. Bone structural similarity score: a multiparametric tool to match properties of biomimetic bone substitutes with their target tissues
36. Optimization of composition, structure and mechanical strength of bioactive 3-D glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone substitution10.1177/0885328211429193 ↗
37. High strength bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1007/s10856-008-3605-0 ↗
38. O(N2 log2 N) filtered back projection reconstruction algorithm for tomography10.1109/83.869187 ↗
39. A new method for the model independent assessment of thickness in three dimensional images10.1046/j.1365-2818.1997.1340694.x ↗
40. SAS. Statistical analysis system, version 82, in: vol. 2, Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1982.
41. Age- and gender-dependent changes in three-dimensional microstructure of cortical and trabecular bone at the human femoral neck10.1007/s00198-009-0993-z ↗
42. Sex differences of human trabecular bone microstructure in aging are site-dependent10.1359/jbmr.070301 ↗
43. The micro-architecture of human cancellous bone from fracture neck of femur patients in relation to the structural integrity and fracture toughness of the tissue10.1016/j.bonr.2015.10.001 ↗
44. Analysis of trabecular microarchitecture of human iliac bone using microcomputed tomography in patients with hip arthrosis with or without vertebral fracture10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00083-0 ↗
45. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.7.1167 ↗
46. The three-dimensional microstructure of trabecular bone: analysis of site-specific variation in the human jaw bone10.5624/isd.2013.43.4.227 ↗
47. Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis10.1172/JCI111096 ↗
48. Porosity of human mandibular condylar bone10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00693.x ↗
49. Segregation and diversity measures in population distribution10.2307/3644339 ↗
50. Power comparison of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests
51. Measurement of pore size and porosity of tissue scaffolds10.1520/JAI11510 ↗
52. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
53. Biggins · 2011
54. The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063 ↗
55. Bioceramic bone graft substitutes: influence of porosity and chemistry10.1111/j.1744-7402.2005.02020.x ↗
56. Effect of ceramic scaffold architectural parameters on biological response10.3389/fbioe.2015.00151 ↗
57. Assessment and comparison of human cortical and trabecular bone structures by low-field NMR
58. Mediation of bone ingrowth in porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes10.1002/jbm.a.10050 ↗
59. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold with high permeability/porosity ratio10.1089/107632703322066714 ↗
60. Comparison of fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants10.1097/00002341-199406000-00005 ↗
61. Novel resorbable glass-ceramic scaffolds for hard tissue engineering: from the parent phosphate glass to its bone-like macroporous derivatives10.1177/0885328213506759 ↗
62. Micro-CT-based screening of biomechanical and structural properties of bone tissue engineering scaffolds10.1007/s11517-006-0071-z ↗
63. Free-form fabrication and micro-CT characterization of poly-ε-caprolactone tissue scaffolds
64. The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052 ↗
65. Alginate/hydroxyapatite biocomposite for bone ingrowth: a trabecular structure with high and isotropic connectivity10.1021/bm900154b ↗
66. Age-related variations in the microstructure of human tibial cancellous bone10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00132-2 ↗
67. Mechanical and morphological properties of trabecular bone samples obtained from third metacarpal bones of cadavers of horses with a bone fragility syndrome and horses unaffected by that syndrome10.2460/ajvr.73.11.1742 ↗
68. 3D cell-migration studies using two-photon engineered polymer scaffolds10.1002/adma.200801319 ↗
69. Biophysical regulation of tumor cell invasion: moving beyond matrix stiffness10.1039/c0ib00095g ↗
70. Nanofiber alignment and direction of mechanical strain affect the ECM production of human ACL fibroblast10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.037 ↗