journal article·2021-07-27Open access

Site-Specifically-Labeled Antibodies for Super-Resolution Microscopy Reveal In Situ Linkage Errors

Susanna M. Früh, Ulf Matti, Philipp R. Spycher, Marina Rubini, Sebastian Lickert, Thomas Schlichthaerle, Ralf Jungmann, Viola Vogel, Jonas Ries, Ingmar Schoen

ACS Nano· Volume 15· Issue 7

Abstract

The precise spatial localization of proteins in situ by super-resolution microscopy (SRM) demands their targeted labeling. Positioning reporter molecules as close as possible to the target remains a challenge in primary cells or tissues from patients that cannot be easily genetically modified. Indirect immunolabeling introduces relatively large linkage errors, whereas site-specific and stoichiometric labeling of primary antibodies relies on elaborate chemistries. In this study, we developed a simple two-step protocol to site-specifically attach reporters such as fluorophores or DNA handles to several immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies from different animal species and benchmarked the performance of these conjugates for 3D STORM (stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy) and DNA-PAINT (point accumulation in nanoscale topography). Glutamine labeling was restricted to two sites per IgG and saturable by exploiting microbial transglutaminase after removal of N-linked glycans. Precision measurements of 3D microtubule labeling shell dimensions in cell lines and human platelets showed that linkage errors from primary and secondary antibodies did not add up. Monte Carlo simulations of a geometric microtubule-IgG model were in quantitative agreement with STORM results. The simulations revealed that the flexible hinge between Fab and Fc segments effectively randomized the direction of the secondary antibody, while the restricted binding orientation of the primary antibody's Fab fragment accounted for most of the systematic offset between the reporter and α-tubulin. DNA-PAINT surprisingly yielded larger linkage errors than STORM, indicating unphysiological conformations of DNA-labeled IgGs. In summary, our cost-effective protocol for generating well-characterized primary IgG conjugates offers an easy route to precise SRM measurements in arbitrary fixed samples.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques · Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research · Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hahn-Schickard, Georges-Koehler-Allee 103, 79110 Freiburg, Germany

Laboratory for MEMS Applications, IMTEK, Department of Microsystems Engineering, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany

Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), 69117 Heidelberg, Germany

Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland

School of Chemistry, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland

Faculty of Physics and Center for Nanoscience, Ludwig Maximilian University, 80539 Munich, Germany

Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152 Martinsried, Germany

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Irish Centre for Vascular Biology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin 2, Ireland

Funding

Eidgen??ssische Technische Hochschule Z??rich · Allianz Industrie Forschung · Albert-Ludwigs-Universit??t Freiburg · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · European Molecular Biology Laboratory · Max-Planck-Gesellschaft · H2020 European Research Council · Center for Nanoscience, Ludwig Maximilian University · Holcim Science Foundation · Graduate School, Quantitative Biosciences Munich

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.01610.1016/j.cell.2016.06.016 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmeth.380410.1038/nmeth.3804 ↗
3. 10.1038/nprot.2018.04210.1038/nprot.2018.042 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.05.04710.1016/j.bpj.2016.05.047 ↗
5. 10.1038/nrm.2017.7110.1038/nrm.2017.71 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20180402010.1002/anie.201804020 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41565-018-0336-310.1038/s41565-018-0336-3 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms893310.1038/ncomms8933 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmeth.199110.1038/nmeth.1991 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmeth.217910.1038/nmeth.2179 ↗
11. 10.1021/bc500498210.1021/bc5004982 ↗
12. 10.1038/nrd.2016.26810.1038/nrd.2016.268 ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20140260610.1002/anie.201402606 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b0022410.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00224 ↗
15. 10.1038/nchem.200310.1038/nchem.2003 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11095-014-1596-810.1007/s11095-014-1596-8 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20100424310.1002/anie.201004243 ↗
18. 10.1021/bc400574z10.1021/bc400574z ↗
19. 10.1021/ja044996f10.1021/ja044996f ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0609910.1021/acsnano.0c06099 ↗
21. 10.1083/jcb.20170911510.1083/jcb.201709115 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja310527910.1021/ja3105279 ↗
23. 10.1371/journal.pone.006900410.1371/journal.pone.0069004 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00418-014-1192-310.1007/s00418-014-1192-3 ↗
25. 10.1038/nmeth.466110.1038/nmeth.4661 ↗
26. 10.1002/cphc.20180063010.1002/cphc.201800630 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.01.00110.1016/j.jmb.2017.01.001 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.05.00310.1016/j.bpj.2010.05.003 ↗
29. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100475210.1371/journal.pcbi.1004752 ↗
30. 10.1021/bi962514+10.1021/bi962514+ ↗
31. 10.1073/pnas.040011910110.1073/pnas.0400119101 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.02110.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.021 ↗
33. 10.2312/molva.2018110310.2312/molva.20181103 ↗
34. 10.4161/mabs.3.6.1792210.4161/mabs.3.6.17922 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0161-5890(00)00105-X10.1016/S0161-5890(00)00105-X ↗
36. 10.1016/j.biologicals.2005.06.00710.1016/j.biologicals.2005.06.007 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76602-110.1016/S0006-3495(00)76602-1 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41592-020-0938-110.1038/s41592-020-0938-1 ↗