Pt–Rh Model Nanoparticle Catalysts for Selective Oxidation of Ammonia to Nitrogen─A Systematic Screening Study
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Abatement processes for ammonia (NH 3 ) slip have gained renewed attention due to growing interest in using liquid NH 3 as a marine fuel. A promising approach is selective catalytic oxidation (SCO) of NH 3 to nitrogen (N 2 ). This study presents the catalytic performance of five well-defined Al 2 O 3 -supported mono- and bimetallic Pt–Rh model catalysts for this reaction. Key findings show that the larger Pt nanoparticles (17 nm) exhibit a higher NH 3 turnover frequency (TOF) than the smaller ones (8 nm) while maintaining similar product selectivity. Additionally, the NH 3 TOF decreases in the order Pt > Pt 1– x Rh x solid solution > Rh. Despite this trend, the catalysts Pt, Pt 1– x Rh x solid solution, and Rh exhibit narrow and distinct temperature windows where the N 2 selectivity exceeds 80% at 195–225, 240–250, and 300–315 °C, respectively. Thermal stability tests conducted in air for 8 h and 1 week reveal that both the Rh(core)–Pt(shell) and the Pt 1– x Rh x solid solution nanoparticles undergo Rh surface enrichment. These results indicate that neither elemental configuration remains stable under the SCO-NH 3 conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Materials Science and Nanotechnology, Department of Chemistry, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern, Oslo N-0315, Norway
Yara International ASA
Yara Technology Centre
Funding
Norges Forskningsråd · Universitetet i Oslo
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.01.02410.1016/j.cattod.2014.01.024 ↗
2. 10.1039/C5RA03218K10.1039/C5RA03218K ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10457510.1016/j.jece.2020.104575 ↗
4. 10.3390/molecules2621646110.3390/molecules26216461 ↗
5. 10.1039/D0CY01137A10.1039/D0CY01137A ↗
6. 10.1002/cctc.20200132010.1002/cctc.202001320 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0926-3373(96)00098-710.1016/S0926-3373(96)00098-7 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.catcom.2015.07.01210.1016/j.catcom.2015.07.012 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.01.02910.1016/j.jcat.2020.01.029 ↗
10. 10.1039/D2TA02326A10.1039/D2TA02326A ↗
11. 10.5897/IJPS12.02410.5897/IJPS12.024 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.01.02310.1016/j.powtec.2011.01.023 ↗
13. 10.4209/aaqr.2012.01.001510.4209/aaqr.2012.01.0015 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11783-013-0517-010.1007/s11783-013-0517-0 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.24600110.1103/PhysRevLett.123.246001 ↗
16. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0095610.1021/acscatal.1c00956 ↗
17. 10.1039/D2RA03373A10.1039/D2RA03373A ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.30110.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.301 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5TA09368F10.1039/C5TA09368F ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20210226110.1002/aenm.202102261 ↗
21. Afif, A. B.; Ivashenko, O.; Kolstad, A. J.; Sjåstad, A. O. Honeycomb Reconstruction of multilayered Rh/Pt(111) induced by strain relief. Manuscript in prep.
22. 10.1039/D3NA00448A10.1039/D3NA00448A ↗